|
|
|
|
07-06-2003, 06:42 AM
|
#1 |
Re: NTFS & FAT32
Trent© <> wrote in
news  :> And its still needed...'cause chkdsk is pretty lame on XP. > Why do you consider chkdsk lame? DeMoN_LaG |
|
|
|
07-06-2003, 03:48 PM
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NTFS & FAT32
On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 05:42:27 -0000, "DeMoN_LaG"
<de_on-lag@co_cast.net> wrote: >Trent© <> wrote in >news :> >> And its still needed...'cause chkdsk is pretty lame on XP. >> > >Why do you consider chkdsk lame? Scandisk often catches things that chkdsk will not...especially corrupt database files of various kinds. Have a nice 4th weekend... Trent Help keep down the world population...have your partner spayed or neutered. |
|
|
