![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 18:58:49 GMT, Robert Baer <> wrote:
>BinaryBillTheSailor@Sea++.com wrote: >> >> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:20:23 -0400, "Chris Taylor Jr" <> wrote: >> >> >never said it would be easy or simple. but the fact remains the actions were >> >illegal. >> > >> >Proving the copyright was mine would NOT be very difficult and would also be >> >uncontested. (it was my post) >> >> You are in WAAAAAAY over your head. >> >> BB >> >> > >> >Chris Taylor >> >http://www.nerys.com/ >> > >> ><BinaryBillTheSailor@Sea++.com> wrote in message >> >news:.. . >> >> On 03 Jul 2003 14:32:41 GMT, leah (Charlie Self) >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >BinaryBill states: >> >> >>Copyright only gives you the possible legal standing to try and >> >> >>protect your work at your own expense. Before you can even bring suit, >> >> >>you would have to have a judge rule that you actually own the rights. >> >> > >> >> >Not so. You can sue, and prove the rights are yours during the suit. >> >> > >> >> >> >> You don't have legal standing to sue until you establish you are the >> >> copyright holder. Otherwise, I could sue somebody for copyright >> >> infringement on anything that has ever been published. >> >> >> >> BB >> >> >> > > > Be advised that a the document from the copyright office, covering the >work *IS* uncontestable legal proof. > Without it, one is in a quagmire. That's pretty much what I've been saying, Robert. Normally there is no such document. You copyright a work by marking it as copyrighted. It's a claim, not proof. BB BinaryBillTheSailor@Sea++.com |
|
|