«

new guy wrote:
> Here is the source of the messages I receive. Can anyone please help? Pretty
> please?


Send a complaint with your info below to:

If you don't include the info below your complaint will be disregarded.


>
> Return-path: <>
> Received: from pd7mr3no.prod.shaw.ca
> (pd7mr3no-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.144.130]) by l-daemon
> (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005))
> with ESMTP id <0J2600BNFFMEVU00@l-daemon> for ; Mon,
> 10 Jul 2006 01:32:38 -0600 (MDT)
> Received: from pd6mi2no.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.149.175])
> by pd7mr3no.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built
> Mar
> 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <> for
> (ORCPT ); Mon,
> 10 Jul 2006 01:32:38 -0600 (MDT)
> Received: from dsl-42-71.utaonline.at ([81.189.42.71])
> by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004))
> with SMTP id <0J26005ADFJSW5D0@l-daemon> for ; Mon,
> 10 Jul 2006 01:32:37 -0600 (MDT)
> Received: from mzp.ugixx ([81.189.134.28]) by dsl-42-71.utaonline.at
> (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k6A7ZOWV074674; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:35:24
> +0200
> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:26:43 +0200
> From: Brandon Reid <>
> Subject: colonialism trawl
> To:
> Message-id: <000b01c6a3f3$2c248983$>
> MIME-version: 1.0
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
> Content-type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative";
> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C6A403.EFAD5917"
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-priority: Normal
> Original-recipient: rfc822;
>
>

You can find the source of Spam in Spamcop too:

http://www.spamcop.net

And if the spam is less than 24hrs old you can report it there, otherwise
it is assumed that it's been already reported.

"Truncat" <> wrote in message
newsp.tch4h5ve5ngpqe@yourmum...
> You can find the source of Spam in Spamcop too:
>
> http://www.spamcop.net
>
> And if the spam is less than 24hrs old you can report it there, otherwise
> it is assumed that it's been already reported.

Thanks!

"Poster 60" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
>
> new guy wrote:
>> Here is the source of the messages I receive. Can anyone please help?
>> Pretty please?
>
>
> Send a complaint with your info below to:


Thanks, however there is a DNS error for 81.189.42.71 and 81.189.134.28;
there is no such a domain as utaonline.at or uta.at
It looks like it's coming from astralnet.ro via aorta.net 213.46.x.x. but
the destination protocol is unreachable... well, some of you guys here can
go further than that ....

new guy


>
> If you don't include the info below your complaint will be disregarded.
>
>
>>
>> Return-path: <>
>> Received: from pd7mr3no.prod.shaw.ca
>> (pd7mr3no-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.144.130]) by l-daemon
>> (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005))
>> with ESMTP id <0J2600BNFFMEVU00@l-daemon> for ; Mon,
>> 10 Jul 2006 01:32:38 -0600 (MDT)
>> Received: from pd6mi2no.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.149.175])
>> by pd7mr3no.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01
>> (built Mar
>> 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <> for
>> (ORCPT ); Mon,
>> 10 Jul 2006 01:32:38 -0600 (MDT)
>> Received: from dsl-42-71.utaonline.at ([81.189.42.71])
>> by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15
>> 2004))
>> with SMTP id <0J26005ADFJSW5D0@l-daemon> for ; Mon,
>> 10 Jul 2006 01:32:37 -0600 (MDT)
>> Received: from mzp.ugixx ([81.189.134.28]) by dsl-42-71.utaonline.at
>> (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k6A7ZOWV074674; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:35:24
>> +0200
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:26:43 +0200
>> From: Brandon Reid <>
>> Subject: colonialism trawl
>> To:
>> Message-id: <000b01c6a3f3$2c248983$>
>> MIME-version: 1.0
>> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
>> Content-type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative";
>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C6A403.EFAD5917"
>> X-Priority: 3
>> X-MSMail-priority: Normal
>> Original-recipient: rfc822;
>

new guy wrote:
> "Poster 60" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>
>>
>>new guy wrote:
>>
>>>Here is the source of the messages I receive. Can anyone please help?
>>>Pretty please?
>>
>>
>>Send a complaint with your info below to:
>
>
>
> Thanks, however there is a DNS error for 81.189.42.71 and 81.189.134.28;
> there is no such a domain as utaonline.at or uta.at
> It looks like it's coming from astralnet.ro via aorta.net 213.46.x.x. but
> the destination protocol is unreachable... well, some of you guys here can
> go further than that ....
>
> new guy


Go here and type in 81.189.42.71 http://www.ripe.net - This is one of
the five IP databases for looking up IP's.

The databases can all be found here: http://www.iana.org

"Poster 60" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
>
> new guy wrote:
>> "Poster 60" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>
>>>
>>>new guy wrote:
>>>
>>>>Here is the source of the messages I receive. Can anyone please help?
>>>>Pretty please?
>>>
>>>
>>>Send a complaint with your info below to:
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, however there is a DNS error for 81.189.42.71 and 81.189.134.28;
>> there is no such a domain as utaonline.at or uta.at
>> It looks like it's coming from astralnet.ro via aorta.net 213.46.x.x. but
>> the destination protocol is unreachable... well, some of you guys here
>> can go further than that ....
>>
>> new guy
>
>
> Go here and type in 81.189.42.71 http://www.ripe.net - This is one of
> the five IP databases for looking up IP's.
>
> The databases can all be found here: http://www.iana.org


Thanks a lot!

new guy

Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
> optikl wrote:
>> Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
>>
>>> Dude, get a serious spam filter like any other clever guy does.
>> Try Mailwasher Pro.
>
> Why? Spam filtering should happen at the mail provider and at the eMail
> client, and every modern client already has a good Bayesian filter
> implemented (and only differences between processing efficiency exist).
>
I'm not sure I agree with your "should". Yes, you can "filter" with an
email client. Mailwasher actually does a bit more. But, hey, use what
you like.

optikl wrote:
> Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
>> optikl wrote:
>>> Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dude, get a serious spam filter like any other clever guy does.
>>> Try Mailwasher Pro.
>>
>> Why? Spam filtering should happen at the mail provider and at the eMail
>> client, and every modern client already has a good Bayesian filter
>> implemented (and only differences between processing efficiency exist).
>>
> I'm not sure I agree with your "should". Yes, you can "filter" with an
> email client. Mailwasher actually does a bit more.

Mailwasher doesn't do anything because I'm using POP3-SSL and SMTP-TLS.