![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I am on an wireless network with two other users next door and the firewall I use, Outpost, has given me two equal warnings saying this: "Host declares itself as gateway, Host 192.*.1.3 declares itself as gateway instead of 192.*.1.1" The ips look exactly the same, the "*" its the same number in both cases, the only thing that changes is that instead of ".1" it seems ".3" is declaring itself as a gateway. This also happens with 192.*.1.2 If anyobody can tell me what this warning means in simple language much appreciated. So far it seems the firewall is blocking it. Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php Homachi |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Homachi <> writes:
> I am on an wireless network with two other users next door and the > firewall I use, Outpost, has given me two equal > warnings saying this: > > "Host declares itself as gateway, Host 192.*.1.3 declares itself as > gateway instead of 192.*.1.1" > > The ips look exactly the same, the "*" its the same number in both > cases, the only thing that changes is that instead of ".1" it seems > ".3" is declaring itself as a gateway. This also happens with > 192.*.1.2 > > If anyobody can tell me what this warning means in simple language > much appreciated. > > So far it seems the firewall is blocking it. Who controls the wireless router? What are the legit settings? Are these folks all supposed to be using the network? Do you feel this activity is normal for the network you have? What OS's are they running? To know what is anomalous, you need to define or learn what is normal. One guess as to what may be going on is that perhaps these hosts have a routing protocol enabled and are advertising themselves as the way off the network, or they're doing a DHCP offer, or.... it's hard to say based on what little info you've given about the network's intended operation. -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ Todd H. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
The router is off limits I have no access to it whatsoever as it belongs to somebody I don't know, a friend who knows the admin gave me the pass and username. Network is on WEP, which I am aware is easily crackable but it is not my network so I cant say anything about it. Everyone is running Windows XP as far as I know as nobody here is too technichal, anything out of Windows would be like learning Chinese, we do not have the time or inclination for that. Thanks > Who controls the wireless router? What are the legit settings? Are > these folks all supposed to be using the network? Do you feel this > activity is normal for the network you have? What OS's are they > running? > Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php Homachi |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Homachi <> writes:
> The router is off limits I have no access to it whatsoever as it belongs > to somebody I don't know, a friend who knows the admin gave me the > pass and username. Network is on WEP, which I am aware is easily crackable > but it is not my network so I cant say anything about it. > > Everyone is running Windows XP as far as I know as nobody here is too > technichal, anything out of Windows would be like learning Chinese, we > do not have the time or inclination for that. Hrmm. Doesn't sound like there should be aything funky going on on a relatively straightforward network like that. Perhaps a false positive. You might try whatever Outpost specific forum you can find. And by the way, you're breaking the law by using an encrypted wireless network without the owner's permission. -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ Todd H. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Todd H. wrote:
> And by the way, you're breaking the law by using an encrypted wireless > network without the owner's permission. If he didn't break the (lousy) encryption, but got the key provided at logon, he has been given permission. Sebastian Gottschalk |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I am not breaking the law, as I said I have a password and username set up by the owner and given to me with his permission, even if I don't know him Thank you for your help, I have now detected the same message from ip 255.255.255.255 so it is probably a false warning. > >> And by the way, you're breaking the law by using an encrypted wireless >> network without the owner's permission. > Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php Homachi |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Homachi wrote:
> > I am not breaking the law, as I said I have a password and username set up > by the owner and given to me with his permission, even if I don't know him > > <snip> He knows you, but you don't know him? Very fishy. Notan Notan |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Error: Physical sythesis tool PALAC is not supported by Formal Verification tool Conf | bbiandov | Software | 0 | 12-22-2008 05:25 AM |
| How to activate Remote Assistance with XP using Windows Live Messenger | Oziisr | General Help Related Topics | 0 | 02-01-2008 04:45 PM |
| Cisco 837 ADSL router configuration help needed!! | azzaams | General Help Related Topics | 2 | 09-09-2007 04:22 AM |
| Re: Firewall / Spyware problem | Steven L Umbach | A+ Certification | 0 | 08-15-2006 08:31 PM |
| Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? | Eric Eastridge | A+ Certification | 1 | 06-18-2005 09:08 PM |