![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I visit a forum which is said to be off-shore.
Whois indicates a US Network and US Domain name registration. Are there any other tools at my disposal to truly determine if the forum is truly hosted overseas i.e. Not on US soil. Many thanks Mr Free User |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Mr Free User wrote:
> I visit a forum which is said to be off-shore. > > Whois indicates a US Network and US Domain name registration. > > Are there any other tools at my disposal to truly determine if the > forum is truly hosted overseas i.e. Not on US soil. > > Many thanks Go here http://www.dnsstuff.com/ And put the domain into the TraceRoute box. Typing tracert yourdomain.com from a command prompt will lead you to the same place but the dnsstuff page will give you more information. CJ CJ |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
CJ wrote:
> Mr Free User wrote: >> I visit a forum which is said to be off-shore. >> Whois indicates a US Network and US Domain name registration. >> >> Are there any other tools at my disposal to truly determine if the >> forum is truly hosted overseas i.e. Not on US soil. > > Go here > http://www.dnsstuff.com/ Thanks been there already. The IP leads to Colorado US. DNS Registrant is US. Could this IP then forward to an offshore location? Mr Free User |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:54:34 +0000, Mr Free User <>
wrote: >CJ wrote: >> Mr Free User wrote: >>> I visit a forum which is said to be off-shore. >>> Whois indicates a US Network and US Domain name registration. >>> >>> Are there any other tools at my disposal to truly determine if the >>> forum is truly hosted overseas i.e. Not on US soil. >> >> Go here >> http://www.dnsstuff.com/ > >Thanks been there already. > >The IP leads to Colorado US. >DNS Registrant is US. > >Could this IP then forward to an offshore location? ############################### I can register a domain in the US and pay someone in europe to host the site. Why don't you tell us the IP and the name of the forum and we'll look. donnie |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Mr Free User" <> wrote in message
news:440b2215$0$48822$ reenews.net... >I visit a forum which is said to be off-shore. > > Whois indicates a US Network and US Domain name registration. > > Are there any other tools at my disposal to truly determine if the forum > is truly hosted overseas i.e. Not on US soil. > > Many thanks Why not try tracert ipaddy and see where it takes you??? Open a DOS windown and type tracert IP <enter> Dazza Dazza |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Mr Free User wrote:
> CJ wrote: >> Mr Free User wrote: >>> I visit a forum which is said to be off-shore. >>> Whois indicates a US Network and US Domain name registration. >>> >>> Are there any other tools at my disposal to truly determine if the >>> forum is truly hosted overseas i.e. Not on US soil. >> >> Go here >> http://www.dnsstuff.com/ > > Thanks been there already. > > The IP leads to Colorado US. > DNS Registrant is US. > > Could this IP then forward to an offshore location? As I understand it, if the trace route ends in Colorado, that is where the server is. If the server then sends you somewhere else when you open the page, that must be another IP/domain, in which case you should see that in the address bar of your browser. Why not post the IP/domain and let others here try to locate it? CJ CJ |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Mr Free User wrote:
> CJ wrote: >> Mr Free User wrote: >>> I visit a forum which is said to be off-shore. Whois indicates a US >>> Network and US Domain name registration. >>> >>> Are there any other tools at my disposal to truly determine if the >>> forum is truly hosted overseas i.e. Not on US soil. >> >> Go here >> http://www.dnsstuff.com/ > > Thanks been there already. > > The IP leads to Colorado US. > DNS Registrant is US. > > Could this IP then forward to an offshore location? Yes, and no. It's possible that records point to an errant country of record, but once an IP resolves to a machine it's not going to be "forwarded" anywhere. Even if it is it wouldn't matter because all content would have to pass through that server anyway, so it's as equally open to being compromised. It's also possible you're looking for the wrong thing. The server 'www.somehost.com' can be a completely different machine from 'forums.somehost.com', for example. And plain old 'somehost.com' might resolve to a third place entirely. IOW, if there's an error it's either in someone's records, or your detective skills. it is true it proves someone "untrustworthy" to put it politely. There's also an issue of why claims of "off shore" are being made in the first place, and the usefulness and validity of political boundaries as a "security tool" to begin with. In a surprising number of scenarios it's discovered that machines located in remote locations are more vulnerable to the types of compromises they claim to be safer from. TLA snoops have considerably more authority in some places than they do others, and agreements between jurisdictions can actually make it EASIER to compromise a remote machine than it is one in your own back yard. To know if a particular server is "safer", one has to examine not only the laws of that location and their own, but the relationship between the two. If you want real answers, give real information. Tell the class what forum you're talking about specifically, and we'll check to make sure you're not looking at the wrong IP to begin with, then tell you exactly where it's located with a really high degree of accuracy. George Orwell |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
George Orwell wrote:
> If you want real answers, give real information. Tell the class what forum > you're talking about specifically, and we'll check to make sure you're not > looking at the wrong IP to begin with, then tell you exactly where it's > located with a really high degree of accuracy. As requested opreview dot net Mr Free User |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
CJ wrote:
>>> Go here >>> http://www.dnsstuff.com/ >> >> Thanks been there already. >> >> The IP leads to Colorado US. >> DNS Registrant is US. >> >> Could this IP then forward to an offshore location? > > As I understand it, if the trace route ends in Colorado, that is where the > server is. First, how do you know the traceroute ends in Colorado? It shows you a resolved name and an IP, and a bit of assurance in that you can sometimes see locational information in hops just prior to your destination, but in the end you're left with imperfect information at best. Geolocation and CDIR information aren't always completely accurate. > If the server then sends you somewhere else when you open the page, that > must be another IP/domain, in which case you should see that in the > address bar of your browser. Not necessarily. There's any number of ways to transparently forward data from one location to another. More commonly this is done by clients to give the appearance that they are the ones residing in falsified locations, but the exact same technology can be applied to the other end of the connection. The same VPN setup that makes you look like you're surfing from your privacy provider can make it appear as though the web page you're downloading is coming from what amounts to an "anonymizing proxy", to put it in common terms. You're not always looking at information that's fed directly form the machine you're getting it from. A good example would be Google, which feeds people data from any number of server clusters in God knows how many different locations, but does it in such a way that you only see it as a page coming for a single machine. This sort of distributed database really isn't at all that uncommon. It would probably be unusual for a little known web forum to be using it, but I could see how/why they might want to simply "proxy" the forum entirely. Just some thoughts..... George Orwell |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 07 Mar 200600, in the Usenet newsgroup alt.computer.security, in article
<440d66cb$0$76207$ ews.net>, Mr Free User wrote: >George Orwell wrote: >> If you want real answers, give real information. >As requested opreview dot net Registrant: Miriam Schonberger Miriam Schonberger () 12-150 E Briarwood Ave Suite 348 Centennial Colorado,80112 US Tel. +1.30364998 Creation Date: 03-Feb-2006 However, that smells funny. 'Centennial, Colorado' is a suburb of Denver, about 16 miles South of the state capital building. The address itself seems to be munged. [compton ~]$ host opreview.net opreview.net has address 72.20.26.169 opreview.net mail is handled (pri=0) by opreview.net [compton ~]$ host 72.20.26.169 169.26.20.72.IN-ADDR.ARPA domain name pointer spunk.voltnet.org [compton ~]$ Voltnet.org is hiding their registration information through a mailbox at what appears to be the UPS Store at Los Angeles International Airport. The registration data also has what appears to be "inconsistent" information. The nameservers authoritative for opreview.net are _registered_ in "Dublin, Ireland, again with "inconsistent" information, but TTLs strongly suggest otherwise. The IP address is assigned to Staminus Communications in Fullerton, CA, but it doesn't appear to be on line at the moment, and Staminus is not responding to whois queries. A trace blackholes in Los Angeles. Ah, it's a firewall - looks like the facility _MAY_BE_ in Irvine, CA. However as others have pointed out, that itself is meaningless. Were you to look up my employer, you'd find a New York state address, but the last host to respond to a trace is near San Francisco. Looking at my headers, you'd find I'm probably in Arizona, but other facilities of the company are in Japan, France, Brazil, and elsewhere. Oh, and I'm not posting from their address space. So the question is, why is it important that the server be 'off-shore'? There is (without legal intervention) very little you can do to trace it to an actual location, and who knows - it might be being forwarded to a server in a basement across the river from Bethesda, Maryland (though I doubt that very much - to crude). I'll say this much - the server is trying to hide a lot of data. Old guy Moe Trin |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HP MediaSmart Server LX195 | Admin | Front Page News | 0 | 05-26-2009 04:43 PM |
| Prerequisites 70-745 (Business Intelligence) | Valmont | MCITP | 3 | 06-24-2008 03:03 PM |
| SQL Server 2008 delayed into Q3 2008 | darrilgibson@cox.net | MCITP | 0 | 01-27-2008 10:26 PM |
| MCITP SQL Server 2005 or SQL Server 2008 | Darrilgibson@gmail.com | MCITP | 0 | 12-19-2007 01:56 PM |
| Re: Need Ideas For A New Server, Long Post | Gareth Church | A+ Certification | 2 | 07-27-2003 12:46 PM |