Software copy protection

EXECryptor Software Copy Protection and License Management System is
updated to version 2.3.7

News:

· Now all license type can use trial restrictions function. To set a
trial period you can use current date or the application release date.
Binding to application release date allows to generate the serial
numbers valid for all software releases untill fixed date. To use this
feature switch in licenses editor and set llicenses checking needed
options in "Expire" menu.
· added full Unicode support for serial numbers. Using Unicode
registration names they are transformed in UTF-8 representation and
then are treated by relevant same-name ANSI functions. As the
representation of string that contains only latin characters and digits
in UTF-8 is the same as ANSI representation we have the backward
compatibility. new API function: VerifySerialNumberW
· added new API: DecodeSerialNumber. This function is analogic to
VerifySerialNumberEx, but it doesn't influence on IsRegistered,
RegConst_* result nor on CRYPT_REG/CRYPT_UNREG blocks execution. This
means the verification result is saved nowhere. You can use it for
additional serial numbers verification or when you need to verify a
serial number without any further program behaviour change.
· added vrStolen in TVerifyResult for stolen key detection and custom
action
· eckeygen.dll updated for unicode support. changed interface of
CreateSerialNumberTimeLimit.
· added new feature: Advanced code protection. see help for more
details.
· improved: new API function GetReleaseDate, GetEXECryptorVersion,
IsAppProtected
· improved: Unicode version of SecureRead/Write, Encrypt/DecryptStr
· improved: antidebug and multithreading

StrongBit Technology web site http://www.strongbit.com is upgraded and
completely redesigned.

John

In article <. com>
"John" <> wrote:
>
> EXECryptor Software Copy Protection and License Management System is
> updated to version 2.3.7
===cut this bullshit===

SPAM

George Orwell

I don't agree. Good protection. If you make no sense of it is not the
reason to claim it "spam" and "b***t*

jedubo@yahoo.fr

wrote:
> I don't agree. Good protection.

Wrong. It has now been long proven that Code Obfuscation, based on the
definition, doesn't either work at all or is totally impractical.

> If you make no sense of it is not the
> reason to claim it "spam" and "b***t*

Even if it would make sense this message would still be just simple spam
or, as opposed, a web2news gateway (which in usually considered as spam).

Sebastian Gottschalk