![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
Computer Security - Security Vulnerabilities in Sun JRE may Allow an Untrusted Applet to Elevate its Privileges |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/docum...=1-26-102171-1
"Note: It is recommended that affected versions be removed from your system. For more information, please see the installation notes on the respective java.sun.com download pages." -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm David H. Lipman |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"David H. Lipman" wrote:
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/docum...=1-26-102171-1 > > "Note: It is recommended that affected versions be removed from > your system. Well, which version is NOT affected? I see that all these cases, that version 1.3.x is not affected. Should I revert to that version? How secure is version 1.5.0_05-b05 ? Virus Guy |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
From: "Virus Guy" <>
| "David H. Lipman" wrote: | >> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/docum...=1-26-102171-1 >> >> "Note: It is recommended that affected versions be removed from >> your system. | | Well, which version is NOT affected? | | I see that all these cases, that version 1.3.x is not affected. | Should I revert to that version? | | How secure is version 1.5.0_05-b05 ? Update to and use JRE 5 update 6. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm David H. Lipman |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Virus Guy - I would strongly recommend against using ANY version prior to
1.5.0_05-b06. Contrary to the Sun Bulletin, a group of MVP's that have been working on this issue for several months now have come to stongly suspect that 1.3.x versions contain an exploit that is being utilized by Winfixer/Vundo and have been recommending against the use of any earlier version to include specifically the uninstalling of ALL prior versions. See here: http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/0467 and my Blog. -- Regards, Jim Byrd, MS-MVP/DTS/AH-VSOP My Blog, Defending Your Machine, here: http://DefendingYourMachine.blogspot.com/ "Virus Guy" <> wrote in message news: > "David H. Lipman" wrote: > >> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/docum...=1-26-102171-1 >> >> "Note: It is recommended that affected versions be removed from >> your system. > > Well, which version is NOT affected? > > I see that all these cases, that version 1.3.x is not affected. > Should I revert to that version? > > How secure is version 1.5.0_05-b05 ? Jim Byrd |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:37:05 GMT, "David H. Lipman"
<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote: >From: "Virus Guy" <> > >| "David H. Lipman" wrote: >| >>> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/docum...=1-26-102171-1 >>> >>> "Note: It is recommended that affected versions be removed from >>> your system. >| >| Well, which version is NOT affected? >| >| I see that all these cases, that version 1.3.x is not affected. >| Should I revert to that version? >| >| How secure is version 1.5.0_05-b05 ? > >Update to and use JRE 5 update 6. And remove all of the other versions from your system. shawn |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 05:45:01 -0500, shawn <>
wrote: >On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:37:05 GMT, "David H. Lipman" ><DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote: > >>From: "Virus Guy" <> >> >>| "David H. Lipman" wrote: >>| >>>> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/docum...=1-26-102171-1 >>>> >>>> "Note: It is recommended that affected versions be removed from >>>> your system. >>| >>| Well, which version is NOT affected? >>| >>| I see that all these cases, that version 1.3.x is not affected. >>| Should I revert to that version? >>| >>| How secure is version 1.5.0_05-b05 ? >> >>Update to and use JRE 5 update 6. > Did that and removed all other version shown on Ad/remove programs. However there is still a picture of "Java(TM) Control Panel" showing on control panel. Its version seems to be 1.5.0 (build 1.5.0._06-b05 and its update info shows Dec 2005. What is that and why does it not show any update info?? SK |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Art wrote:
> I wonder why security conscious users have Java installed at all. > I dropped it long ago and have never missed it. I know that some > financial institutions require it I'm running version 1.5.0_05-b05 and ever since I installed that version (or perhaps a version or two before it) some page components (presumably java graphics elements) have the annoying habbit of being rendered/displayed in other windows that have the current focus (such as word, excel, etc). For example, on this page: http:/www.forexdirectory.net/cad.html The currency matrix above the chart is frequently drawn on-top of portions of the screen where it shouldn't be (sometimes even on the desktop). I don't know what that page would look like without Java... Virus Guy |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Virus Guy - FWIW, that page renders correctly on my machine using IE6SP1
and 1.5.0_05-b06. -- Regards, Jim Byrd, MS-MVP/DTS/AH-VSOP My Blog, Defending Your Machine, here: http://DefendingYourMachine.blogspot.com/ "Virus Guy" <> wrote in message news: > Art wrote: > >> I wonder why security conscious users have Java installed at all. >> I dropped it long ago and have never missed it. I know that some >> financial institutions require it > > I'm running version 1.5.0_05-b05 and ever since I installed that > version (or perhaps a version or two before it) some page components > (presumably java graphics elements) have the annoying habbit of being > rendered/displayed in other windows that have the current focus (such > as word, excel, etc). > > For example, on this page: > > http:/www.forexdirectory.net/cad.html > > The currency matrix above the chart is frequently drawn on-top of > portions of the screen where it shouldn't be (sometimes even on the > desktop). I don't know what that page would look like without Java... Jim Byrd |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On that special day, Virus Guy, () said...
> http:/www.forexdirectory.net/cad.html > > The currency matrix above the chart is frequently drawn on-top of > portions of the screen where it shouldn't be (sometimes even on the > desktop). I don't know what that page would look like without Java... rather empty. At least, if I refuse to let all these advertisment cookies to be placed on my machine. Gabriele Neukam -- Ah, Information. A property, too valuable these days, to give it away, just so, at no cost. Gabriele Neukam |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
> However there is still a picture of "Java(TM) Control Panel" showing
> on control panel. Its version seems to be 1.5.0 (build 1.5.0._06-b05 > and its update info shows Dec 2005. I had that. But on rebooting it was gone. Stephen Howe Stephen Howe |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Computer Security Information and What You Can Do To Keep Your SystemSafe! | Ann.Anderson.group.com@gmail.com | A+ Certification | 0 | 12-06-2007 01:55 AM |
| Computer Security | aldrich.chappel.com.use@gmail.com | A+ Certification | 0 | 11-27-2007 02:11 AM |
| Computer Security Information (Free Articles and eBooks) | aditya.jaiswal.com.use@gmail.com | DVD Video | 0 | 10-10-2007 04:53 AM |
| Re: Missing WinXP Security Center Applet | Steven L Umbach | A+ Certification | 2 | 06-27-2006 12:56 AM |
| Re: Missing WinXP Security Center Applet | Steven L Umbach | A+ Certification | 0 | 06-22-2006 09:34 PM |