Re: Truecrypt 4.1

nemo_outis wrote:

> Borked Pseudo Mailed <> wrote in
> news: d.net:
>
>> Jeremy wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "nemo_outis" <> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> Caveat emptor. And all the more so when the "emptor" has paid nothing.
>>>> No,
>>>
>>> Well said.
>>>
>>> Perhaps the critic could sue to get back what he paid for it . . .
>>
>> Why do you ASSume anyone wants anything back? Have you lost track of the
>> conversation, or did you never really grasp the gist of it in the first
>> place?
>>
>>
>
> Your incomprehension has plumbed new depths of mental numbness. Even
> outright sarcasm passes you unnoticed.
>
> Every cent you paid for Truecrypt will be cheerfully refunded if you're
> dissatisfied. Lucky you - that's a better guarantee than you get with
> commercial programs.

Oh lookie everyone! A blowhard with a sticky [PLAY] button.

Lemme type this real slow so your primal brain doesn't overload again.
Nobody is asking for anything back, or even saying that TrueCrypt did
anything wrong. They did EXACTLY WHAT THEY HAD TO DO.

If you happen to yank your head out of your ass long enough to grasp this
simple concept please let us know.

>
> Getting it yet, dimwit?
>
> Regards,

Nomen Nescio

Nomen Nescio <> wrote in
news::


Back so soon? I thought you were done with me.

Ah well, since you don't seem able to help yourself, it devolves upon me to
squelch this unhealthy fascination you have with me.

And so.... PLONK!

nemo_outis