![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Jeremy wrote:
> > "nemo_outis" <> wrote in message >> >> Caveat emptor. And all the more so when the "emptor" has paid nothing. >> No, > > Well said. > > Perhaps the critic could sue to get back what he paid for it . . . Why do you ASSume anyone wants anything back? Have you lost track of the conversation, or did you never really grasp the gist of it in the first place? Borked Pseudo Mailed |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Borked Pseudo Mailed <> wrote in
news: d.net: > Jeremy wrote: > >> >> "nemo_outis" <> wrote in message >>> >>> Caveat emptor. And all the more so when the "emptor" has paid nothing. >>> No, >> >> Well said. >> >> Perhaps the critic could sue to get back what he paid for it . . . > > Why do you ASSume anyone wants anything back? Have you lost track of the > conversation, or did you never really grasp the gist of it in the first > place? > Your incomprehension has plumbed new depths of mental numbness. Even outright sarcasm passes you unnoticed. Every cent you paid for Truecrypt will be cheerfully refunded if you're dissatisfied. Lucky you - that's a better guarantee than you get with commercial programs. Getting it yet, dimwit? Regards, nemo_outis |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <> wrote in message news: d.net... > Jeremy wrote: > >> >> "nemo_outis" <> wrote in message >>> >>> Caveat emptor. And all the more so when the "emptor" has paid nothing. >>> No, >> >> Well said. >> >> Perhaps the critic could sue to get back what he paid for it . . . > > Why do you ASSume anyone wants anything back? Have you lost track of the > conversation, or did you never really grasp the gist of it in the first > place? > > > The only thing that I "ASSume" is that you are ignorant of the definition of "sarcasm," or that you are indeed an asshole. Jeremy |
|