Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computer Security
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

Computer Security - Security kernels

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-21-2005, 02:46 PM   #1
Default Security kernels


How do you decide whether to include a mechanism in a security kernel or
not? Policy? Is it based on trade-offs or kernel design, ...? Anyone
who has a good reference for this?

So far I read some things about security kernels in general, but not
about how to decide what to include and what not.

Thanks in advance,
Jan


JeZuZ
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 10:40 PM   #2
Bowgus
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Security kernels
Well yeah, first you establish the security policy you want, then you
implement it within the kernel. As to mechanisms, that term means different
thing to different people. I myself use the term e.g. access control
mechanism ... but I'm an old guy, eh. Maybe go to the SE Linux site
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/ . Lots of good stuff there as in look into it's
policy and how it's implemented ... imo.


> How do you decide whether to include a mechanism in a security kernel or
> not? Policy? Is it based on trade-offs or kernel design, ...? Anyone
> who has a good reference for this?
>
> So far I read some things about security kernels in general, but not
> about how to decide what to include and what not.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Jan





Bowgus
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 10:35 AM   #3
Edward A. Feustel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Security kernels

"JeZuZ" <> wrote in message
news: ...
> How do you decide whether to include a mechanism in a security kernel or
> not? Policy? Is it based on trade-offs or kernel design, ...? Anyone
> who has a good reference for this?
>
> So far I read some things about security kernels in general, but not about
> how to decide what to include and what not.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Jan


A security kernel should include ONLY the elements that provide the base
required to implement the security for your system. One example is the
virtualization of your physical memory, especially if this will be used in
enforcement. Another is the fundamental access mechanism
for your external storage and communication elements, e.g., disk, tape,
network, and terminal.

If memory and communications can be protected from snooping, and
cryptography and any non essential functions can be modularized and kept out
of the security kernel.

In general, keep everything possible OUT OF the security kernel.

See for example the University of Utah work.
Ed




Edward A. Feustel
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Computer Security Information and What You Can Do To Keep Your SystemSafe! Ann.Anderson.group.com@gmail.com A+ Certification 0 12-06-2007 01:55 AM
Computer Security aldrich.chappel.com.use@gmail.com A+ Certification 0 11-27-2007 02:11 AM
Computer Security Information (Free Articles and eBooks) aditya.jaiswal.com.use@gmail.com DVD Video 0 10-10-2007 04:53 AM
Re: Mac Security vs. Windows Security Tony Sivori A+ Certification 0 10-28-2003 06:23 AM
Re: Mac Security vs. Windows Security Ghost A+ Certification 0 10-28-2003 02:16 AM




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46