US 'World Genius' Touts 6.8GHz 'Quantum-Optical' CPU

Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the truth,
WOW!

http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784

Imhotep

Imhotep

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:01:09 -0400, Imhotep <>
wrote:

>Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the truth,
>WOW!
>
>http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784

does it have security problems?

--
Jim Watt
http://www.gibnet.com

Jim Watt

Jim Watt wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:01:09 -0400, Imhotep <>
> wrote:
>
>>Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the truth,
>>WOW!
>>
>>http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784
>
> does it have security problems?
>
> --
> Jim Watt
> http://www.gibnet.com

PCs have a ceiling with regard to speed. Loosely stated, the PC architecture
must change to a different platform soon. There are too many limitations
with the current system. For example, excessive heat, attenuation (as
systems get smaller and smaller), etc, etc. It has been said that the next
generation of CPUs will be Quantum based.

Reading is your friend Jim, don't fear it.

Imhotep

Imhotep

Sure looks like he also built a time machine.

Photos from the consumer electronics show in January of 2006?

http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page5.htmlImhotep wrote:
> Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the truth,
> WOW!
>
> http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784
>
> Imhotep
>
>

Derrick Stone

Imhotep <> writes:

>Jim Watt wrote:

>> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:01:09 -0400, Imhotep <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the truth,
>>>WOW!
>>>
>>>http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784
>>
>> does it have security problems?
>>
>> --
>> Jim Watt
>> http://www.gibnet.com

>PCs have a ceiling with regard to speed. Loosely stated, the PC architecture

And what is that ceiling?

>must change to a different platform soon. There are too many limitations

Perhaps, but what is it you are suggesting.

>with the current system. For example, excessive heat, attenuation (as

How does making it smaller increase attenuation? And What level of heat is
"excessive" ( current machines are of order 10^10 above the thermodynamic
limit of dissipation per quantum gate-- assuming dissipative gates)

>systems get smaller and smaller), etc, etc. It has been said that the next
>generation of CPUs will be Quantum based.

Since the world is quantum based, that is a pretty safe prediction.


>Reading is your friend Jim, don't fear it.

It depends on what you read.


>Imhotep

Unruh

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:01:09 -0400, in alt.computer.security , Imhotep
<> in <fdydnW9ZDvmZ2oLeRVn-> wrote:

>Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the truth,
>WOW!
>
>http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784
>
>Imhotep
>
If anyone want one I will sell it to you for $100. The thing is, you
send me the cash now and I don't have to deliver until they are
available. No money back guarantee. And I can also guarantee your
level of satisfaction. (I make no claims here of what level that will
be.)

--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

Genocide is news | Be A Witness
http://www.beawitness.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
www.darfurgenocide.org

Save Darfur.org :: Violence and Suffering in Sudan's Darfur Region
http://www.savedarfur.org/

Matt Silberstein

Hehe. You've got my $100 if you can explain how 'quantum-optical' is not
a logical impossibility.

Matt Silberstein wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:01:09 -0400, in alt.computer.security , Imhotep
> <> in <fdydnW9ZDvmZ2oLeRVn-> wrote:
>
>
>>Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the truth,
>>WOW!
>>
>>http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784
>>
>>Imhotep
>>
>
> If anyone want one I will sell it to you for $100. The thing is, you
> send me the cash now and I don't have to deliver until they are
> available. No money back guarantee. And I can also guarantee your
> level of satisfaction. (I make no claims here of what level that will
> be.)
>

Derrick Stone

Unruh wrote:

> Imhotep <> writes:
>
>>Jim Watt wrote:
>
>>> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:01:09 -0400, Imhotep <>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the
>>>>truth, WOW!
>>>>
>>>>http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784
>>>
>>> does it have security problems?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Watt
>>> http://www.gibnet.com
>
>>PCs have a ceiling with regard to speed. Loosely stated, the PC
>>architecture
>
> And what is that ceiling?

Hummm. are you saying that their are no limitations in the current CPU and
buss architectures? I am confused please explain.

>>must change to a different platform soon. There are too many limitations
>
> Perhaps, but what is it you are suggesting.

I am not an electrical engineer. I am a software engineer (well, my degree
anyway). As such I am not suggesting anything. Just found an article that I
though was interesting relating to computing.

>>with the current system. For example, excessive heat, attenuation (as
>
> How does making it smaller increase attenuation? And What level of heat is
> "excessive" ( current machines are of order 10^10 above the thermodynamic
> limit of dissipation per quantum gate-- assuming dissipative gates)

It is my understanding that as the CPUs get smalled, the "walls" in between
the paths also get smaller. As such there are limitations on small they can
become before two paths, close to each other, start to interfere with each
other. Again, sorry about the lack in electrical engineering "speak" my
degree is in software

>>systems get smaller and smaller), etc, etc. It has been said that the next
>>generation of CPUs will be Quantum based.
>
> Since the world is quantum based, that is a pretty safe prediction.

You knew as well as I, I was speaking about quantum computing. Not the
quantifying of life

>
>
>>Reading is your friend Jim, don't fear it.
>
> It depends on what you read.

Reading is never a waste of time when it is scientific...

>
>>Imhotep

Imhotep

Imhotep <> writes:

>Unruh wrote:

>> Imhotep <> writes:
>>
>>>Jim Watt wrote:
>>
>>>> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:01:09 -0400, Imhotep <>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the
>>>>>truth, WOW!
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784
>>>>
>>>> does it have security problems?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jim Watt
>>>> http://www.gibnet.com
>>
>>>PCs have a ceiling with regard to speed. Loosely stated, the PC
>>>architecture
>>
>> And what is that ceiling?

>Hummm. are you saying that their are no limitations in the current CPU and
>buss architectures? I am confused please explain.

You claimed a ceiling,I didn't. YOu need to justify your statement.

>
>>>must change to a different platform soon. There are too many limitations
>>
>> Perhaps, but what is it you are suggesting.

>I am not an electrical engineer. I am a software engineer (well, my degree
>anyway). As such I am not suggesting anything. Just found an article that I
>though was interesting relating to computing.

"must change to a different platform soon" is not the statement of someone
who claims to know nothing.

And you did not just find an interesting article, you made editorial
comments about it as well.



>>>with the current system. For example, excessive heat, attenuation (as
>>
>> How does making it smaller increase attenuation? And What level of heat is
>> "excessive" ( current machines are of order 10^10 above the thermodynamic
>> limit of dissipation per quantum gate-- assuming dissipative gates)

>It is my understanding that as the CPUs get smalled, the "walls" in between
>the paths also get smaller. As such there are limitations on small they can
>become before two paths, close to each other, start to interfere with each
>other. Again, sorry about the lack in electrical engineering "speak" my
>degree is in software

That is not attenuation it is crosstalk.


>>>systems get smaller and smaller), etc, etc. It has been said that the next
>>>generation of CPUs will be Quantum based.
>>
>> Since the world is quantum based, that is a pretty safe prediction.

>You knew as well as I, I was speaking about quantum computing. Not the
>quantifying of life

Quantum computing is NOT the next generation of CPUs. Quantum computing may
be good for some tasks but certainly not general purpose computing.
And in quantum computing Moores law is logarithmic. Ie, the number of bits
increases by one every two years, (not doubling)


>>
>>
>>>Reading is your friend Jim, don't fear it.
>>
>> It depends on what you read.

>Reading is never a waste of time when it is scientific...

Some reading is a waste of time. (Eg, Angels and Demons)


>>
>>>Imhotep

Unruh

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:25:36 -0400, in alt.computer.security , Derrick
Stone <> in <dfq6o1$v1$>
wrote:

>Hehe. You've got my $100 if you can explain how 'quantum-optical' is not
>a logical impossibility.

Never said it was a logical impossibly, I am just saying that this
thing is a hoax.


>Matt Silberstein wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:01:09 -0400, in alt.computer.security , Imhotep
>> <> in <fdydnW9ZDvmZ2oLeRVn-> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Not sure if this guy is full of it or not, but if he is telling the truth,
>>>WOW!
>>>
>>>http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=11784
>>>
>>>Imhotep
>>>
>>
>> If anyone want one I will sell it to you for $100. The thing is, you
>> send me the cash now and I don't have to deliver until they are
>> available. No money back guarantee. And I can also guarantee your
>> level of satisfaction. (I make no claims here of what level that will
>> be.)
>>
--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

Genocide is news | Be A Witness
http://www.beawitness.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
www.darfurgenocide.org

Save Darfur.org :: Violence and Suffering in Sudan's Darfur Region
http://www.savedarfur.org/

Matt Silberstein