In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message <4150751.LQVkQvgiyy@FreeBSD>:
>Roger wrote:
>>>>>http://tinyurl.com/bqydt
>>>>>"There are lots of cities where the black population is low but crime
>>>>>is high such as Dallas and lots of cities where black population is
>>>>>high but crime is low." -- Roger
>>>> Yes, that is what "jack" claimed I wrote.
>>>No, that's what you did write.. Denial isn't a river Roger.
>> LOL -- your URL points to a forgery, and *I'm* the one in denial?
>Its not a forgery, check the header of the post.
Why do you keep removing the original groups from this?
Check the message it claims to be quoting.
One notes that if one walks back up the thread, the actual message
which zie "quotes" as containing this phrase doesn't say anything
about Dallas or crime or anything:
The message your URL points to is
1114562298.11d33c8f2bbecd2dd04*ca889d4c16bf9@bubba news
, which was in response to 9egt6190kj80fm9sp4d11tikhdok52*m...@4ax.com
But the reference there is quoted, too -- let's back up a couple
("jack's" message
1114536848.f6c8b4d63148117aff6*32d0af90e4173@bubba news appears to
directly quote it, and says that On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:05:30 GMT, I
wrote the statement. Of course, "jack" later dropped that part of the
forgery, making it even harder to locate this "quote," but we'll let
that go for a moment.)
So, let's search on that date for the phrase "such as Dallas"
(actually a subset of the search I've already posted) which would be:
http://groups-beta.google.com/*group...se_f*rm/thread...
and looky there: the one and only hit is "jack."
But let's see what he was responding to, since this *seems* to be a
normal citation by a news reader. That would be message
oa326118cl0nsiibc8g2rrmiq37s10*9...@4ax.com, which reads in its
entirety:
<include>
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet
to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Way Back Jack wrote
in message
<4260ee5d.1539...@news.newshos*ting.com>:
>On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:52:08 -0400, "Patrick Keenan" <t...@dev.null>
>wrote:
>>"Way The **** Back Jack" <I'm_with_yo_mo...@home.net> wrote in message
>>news:...
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:41:17 -0400, "Test User" <t...@dev.null> wrote:
>>>>> Before feminism, White people had a culture in which women became
>>>>> mothers, had babies, raised children, and saw to the administration of
>>>>> the hearth and home.
>>>>And were often legally regarded as chattel.
>>> And how did blacks treat their wimmen folk, Butch?
>>Depends on the culture in question.
>>Were you trying to make a point?
>Actually, whigger, I was asking a question.
>
>And still haven't gotten an answer.
Yes, you did -- it just wasn't the one you wanted.
Here is the answer again: "Depends on the culture in question."
Now, was there a point you wanted to make?
Or are you just going to start forging again?
</include>
Where is the phrase that you and "jack" claim I wrote in that message?
Now, this has been pointed out to you in the past, so one might wonder
why you continue to post it as if is were something *I* had posted --
if one were not already aware of the fundamental dishonesty of the
brat and zir buddies over in alt.non.racism.
Now, back to the topics of *this* thread: why did you claim that
Yahoo "tracks all of its users everywhere on the web?"
Where are the rest of those 1232 hate crime hoaxes (keeping in mind
that producing them *still* does not support your lie that *most* hate
crimes are faked?)
Where is even the *start* of support for your lie that all
white-committed hate crimes are nationally televised?
*Then* we can get to the rest of your lies: about the FBI, Nizkor,
the Holocaust, the Moon landings, etc...
Similar Threads
