Wireless Network, And Bluetooth Interference With Cell Phones, And Cordless Phones

Interesting scenerio.

I have been reading a number of articles bringing up problems with cell
phones, various wireless devices, and cordless phones.

With the advent of the popularity of wireless networks, there is starting to
be an interference problem with cellular phones, and the 2.4 gHz cordless
phones, clashing with wireless networks. There are also other wireless
devices that are effected.

If you are buying a cordless phone, and live in an area where there may be
wireless networks, and Bluetooth users, it is advisable to seriously
consider a 5.8 gHz phone. These are more expensive, but are worth it, to not
have reception problems.

Many of the wireless systems, for computers, and industrial systems are
working in a number of bands that are shared. These are in the approximate
range of 320 ~ 380 mHz, 520 ~ 620 mHz, 800 ~ 900 mHz, and 1.2 ~ 2.5 gHz.
These frequencies are approximate, and can vary in different parts of the
world, according to their approved allocation. Over the last few years, the
5 ~ 6 gHz bands have been opening up. If you contact your local
communications authorities, you can find out the exact allocated frequency
bands for your area.


--

JANA
_____

JANA

JANA, <>, the bohemian, self-opinionated fishmonger, and
dustman, yapped:

> Interesting scenerio.
>
> I have been reading a number of articles bringing up problems with
> cell phones, various wireless devices, and cordless phones.
>
> With the advent of the popularity of wireless networks, there is
> starting to be an interference problem with cellular phones, and the
> 2.4 gHz cordless phones, clashing with wireless networks. There are
> also other wireless devices that are effected.
>
> If you are buying a cordless phone, and live in an area where there
> may be wireless networks, and Bluetooth users, it is advisable to
> seriously consider a 5.8 gHz phone. These are more expensive, but are
> worth it, to not have reception problems.
>
> Many of the wireless systems, for computers, and industrial systems
> are working in a number of bands that are shared. These are in the
> approximate range of 320 ~ 380 mHz, 520 ~ 620 mHz, 800 ~ 900 mHz, and
> 1.2 ~ 2.5 gHz. These frequencies are approximate, and can vary in
> different parts of the world, according to their approved allocation.
> Over the last few years, the 5 ~ 6 gHz bands have been opening up. If
> you contact your local communications authorities, you can find out
> the exact allocated frequency bands for your area.

<snort>

You never heard of 5.8GHz wireless networking then, you ****tard ****?

You really are a ****ing loon.

--
http://www.nice-tits.org/pics.html

Kadaitcha Man

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:23:00 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
<nospam@****-off-and-die.com> wrote:

>You never heard of 5.8GHz wireless networking then, you ****tard ****?

Keep the language down girls.

One can get a good result with two tin cans and some string,
however its not got much to do with computers or their security.
--
Jim Watt
http://www.gibnet.com

Jim Watt

Jim Watt wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:23:00 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
> <nospam@****-off-and-die.com> wrote:
>
>> You never heard of 5.8GHz wireless networking then, you ****tard
>> ****?
>
> Keep the language down girls.
>

Stick a broken bottle up your ****ing arse, you ****tard ****. Do you call
your bitch mother 'girl'?

Rebecca

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:45:47 -0800, "Rebecca"
<> wrote:

>Jim Watt wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:23:00 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
>> <nospam@****-off-and-die.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You never heard of 5.8GHz wireless networking then, you ****tard
>>> ****?
>>
>> Keep the language down girls.
>>
>
>Stick a broken bottle up your ****ing arse, you ****tard ****. Do you call
>your bitch mother 'girl'?

Rebecca is such a nice girls name
--
Jim Watt
http://www.gibnet.com

Jim Watt

"Jim Watt" <_way> wrote in message
news:...
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:45:47 -0800, "Rebecca"
> <> wrote:
>
>>Jim Watt wrote:
>>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:23:00 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
>>> <nospam@****-off-and-die.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You never heard of 5.8GHz wireless networking then, you ****tard
>>>> ****?
>>>
>>> Keep the language down girls.
>>>
>>
>>Stick a broken bottle up your ****ing arse, you ****tard ****. Do you call
>>your bitch mother 'girl'?
>
> Rebecca is such a nice girls name
> --
> Jim Watt
> http://www.gibnet.com

Depends. Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm is sweet.....nauseating, but sweet. This
one is more like "Becky the Bitch Castrates the LinixFux".

peelson

peelson wrote:
> "Jim Watt" <_way> wrote in message
> news:...
>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:45:47 -0800, "Rebecca"
>> <> wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Watt wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:23:00 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
>>>> <nospam@****-off-and-die.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You never heard of 5.8GHz wireless networking then, you ****tard
>>>>> ****?
>>>>
>>>> Keep the language down girls.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Stick a broken bottle up your ****ing arse, you ****tard ****. Do
>>> you call your bitch mother 'girl'?
>>
>> Rebecca is such a nice girls name
>> --
>> Jim Watt
>> http://www.gibnet.com
>
> Depends. Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm is sweet.....nauseating, but
> sweet. This one is more like "Becky the Bitch Castrates the LinixFux".

Why thank you darling... what a sweet thing for you to say.

(Don't you wish there were more around to cantrate the linux****s.)

Rebecca

Rebecca must be a man!!!


--

JANA
_____


"Rebecca" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Jim Watt wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:23:00 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
> > <nospam@****-off-and-die.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You never heard of 5.8GHz wireless networking then, you ****tard
> >> ****?
> >
> > Keep the language down girls.
> >
>
> Stick a broken bottle up your ****ing arse, you ****tard ****. Do you call
> your bitch mother 'girl'?
>
>

JANA

Thanks Jim,

You deserve a ............... few points for this one.

--

JANA
_____


"Jim Watt" <_way> wrote in message
news:...
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:23:00 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
> <nospam@****-off-and-die.com> wrote:
>
> >You never heard of 5.8GHz wireless networking then, you ****tard ****?
>
> Keep the language down girls.
>
> One can get a good result with two tin cans and some string,
> however its not got much to do with computers or their security.
> --
> Jim Watt
> http://www.gibnet.com

JANA

Jim Watt, <_way>, the anti-intellectual, maladroit beetle, and
hirer of changing huts by the seaside, ejaculated:

> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:23:00 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
> <nospam@****-off-and-die.com> wrote:
>
>> You never heard of 5.8GHz wireless networking then, you ****tard
>> ****?
>
> Keep the language down girls.
>
> One can get a good result with two tin cans and some string

You'll get a ****ing better result with a hot-running, rusty chainsaw shoved
up your ****ing cloaca, you snot****ed cuntfungus.

--
http://www.nice-tits.org/pics.html

Kadaitcha Man