Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > DVD Video > TDA Menu Problem

Reply
Thread Tools

TDA Menu Problem

 
 
Bob
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-16-2006
On 15 Jun 2006 22:02:11 -0700, wrote:

>It's behavior is also
>obnoxious in that it requires multiple presses to start play and
>multiple presses to return to what you call your "Main Menu".


Clrearly the author of TDA did not understand American remote menus.

>> Maybe I need to reprogram my remote to the "Title" button and leave
>> the "Menu" button off. -- Bob


>NO!!!!! You will mess up your remote's behavior with commercial DVDs.


Yep, I found out yesterday when I started a commercial DVD with Title.
It plays all the crap in front - the FBI tonguewagging, the flying
logos, all the crap you don't want to see ever again.

>BTW, what is the make and model of this remote?


URC 8910

http://www.ofausa.com/remote.php?type=URC%208910

>There is not a simple one step solution to your problem, but there is
>a solution. If you will download and install PgcEdit and drop me an
>e-mail, I will step you thru the procedure to create a "Root Menu" for
>each VTS which does nothing but invoke your "Title Menu". That way
>you won't have to foul up your remote's behavior with commercial DVDs
>and your Menu key will reach the "Main/Top" menu which TDA created.
>OTOH it is a PITA.


Thanks, but I rarely use TDA. I am into AVIs.



--

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible
will make violent revolution inevitable."
--Sun Tzu
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bob
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-16-2006
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:25:57 -0500, "Ken Maltby"
<> wrote:

> Perhaps if you had actually read, at least the first three paragraphs
>of my initial four paragraph reply, and given what I said some thought,
>you could have a better understanding. As it is you seem more
>concerned about what terms are used than about the processes
>involved.


I am concerned that the DVD does not operate the way commercial DVDs
operate. I have put literally hundreds of commercial DVDs thru my
systems and not one of them has caused any menu problems. But I make a
TDA DVD and it does not behave the same.

Is it asking too much that the author of TDA fix his s/w so that DVDs
produced by it behave the same as commercial DVDs?

Apparently it is.


--

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible
will make violent revolution inevitable."
--Sun Tzu
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
afn03488@afn.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-16-2006
> I have never used the TDA "Track Menu" so I have no idea what
> happens when you do use it. -- Bob


Yet here you are bitching about TDA when it is quite obvious you
have neither taken the time to understand it or DVDs in general.

>> It's behavior is also obnoxious in that it requires multiple
>> presses to start play and multiple presses to return to what
>> you call your "Main Menu". -- me


> Clrearly the author of TDA did not understand American remote
> menus. -- Bob


To the contrary, it is you who do not understand. There is no such
thing as a "remote menu" or an "American menu". A remote is only a
device which permits you to operate the player without getting off
your fat ass. The VM which set top players implement and PC players
emulate is defined by an agreed standard, not your desired usage.
TDA conforms to that standard, your usage of it is what is lacking.
See below. BTW, many commercial DVDs require multiple key presses
to obtain the same result. Maybe they were built with TDA. Nah.

I repeat, the "Main Menu" you see on commercial DVDs is not a
"Title Menu" in terms of the DVD standard, and often is not even
a "Root Menu". Of course commercial DVDs are not even structured
like your DVD, not even those composed from TV episodic series.

>>> Maybe I need to reprogram my remote to the "Title" button and
>>> leave the "Menu" button off. -- Bob


>> NO!!!!! You will mess up your remote's behavior with commercial
>> DVDs. -- me


> Yep, I found out yesterday when I started a commercial DVD with
> Title. It plays all the crap in front - the FBI tonguewagging, the
> flying logos, all the crap you don't want to see ever again. --Bob


That is generally what happens, although some authors set flags
in the First Play section and use them to prevent this. Sorry
the warning was too late.

>> BTW, what is the make and model of this remote? -- me


> URC 8910 http://www.ofausa.com/remote.php?type=URC%208910 -- Bob


OK, this beastie tries to control a multitude of devices. It
provides four "learning keys" L1-L4. When you enter the codes
for your DVD player, what functions do they perform? Have you
remapped these keys for your DVD player? I suspect that at least
three of those keys were mapped to invoke the "Angle Menu", the
"Subtitle Menu", and the "Audio Menu" to provide the functions
contained on most remotes accompanying a DVD player. A "Zoom"
function is most likely the function for the fourth. How often
do you use these functions? The "Guide" key for the DVD is
described as being used to reach the setup functions of the player
as opposed to the "Setup" functions of a DVD. How often do you
change the default settings of your DVD player? Is it infrequent
enough to use the player's remote for this use? Any of those keys
is a more likely a remap target than the "Menu" button to emulate
the "Top Menu" key found on DVD remotes.

>> If you will download and install PgcEdit and drop me an e-mail,
>> I will step you thru the procedure to create a "Root Menu" for
>> each VTS which does nothing but invoke your "Title Menu". -- me


> Thanks, but I rarely use TDA. I am into AVIs. -- Bob


So you'd rather bitch than learn enough to solve YOUR problem.

> I am concerned that the DVD does not operate the way commercial
> DVDs operate. -- Bob


But it does; the DVD goes precisely to where you tell it when you
press the "Menu Key" which is NOWHERE because YOU fail to provide
a location to go. If you used "Track Menus", they would respond to
your "Menu Key". See below.

> I have put literally hundreds of commercial DVDs thru my systems
> and not one of them has caused any menu problems. But I make a
> TDA DVD and it does not behave the same. -- Bob


That is because the authors of commercial DVDs go thru considerable
effort to utilize the capabilities of the DVD virtual machine and
you don't want to expend the time and effort to obtain the same
results. I repeat my earlier assessment that you are a one click
wonder who demands instant comfort.

> Is it asking too much that the author of TDA fix his s/w so that
> DVDs produced by it behave the same as commercial DVDs?
> Apparently it is. -- Bob


I agree. If you would take the time to understand DVD structure and
player operation, you wouldn't have such naive expectations. For the
user TDA is intended, it does an admirable job. I don't like their
periodic validation policy, so I won't purchase it. If you want
commercial disk calibre menus, you are going to have to purchase a
heftier authoring program, and sit down on your fat ass and WORK to
obtain similar results.

Lastly, why are you putting your clips in seperate tracks? Because
they do not share the same video parameters? [That is one of the
requirements of THE DVD standard, that all video within a VTS have
the same video parameters. Why didn't DVD player manufacturers
accomodate differnt video parameters within a VTS? It must be their
fault, not yours]. Preprocess all your MPEG clips to the same video
parameters. Put all the clips on one track, and establish chapter
points [nasty, nasty work] for each clip. [I surmise you don't do
this because it involves work on your part, and if you just dump
your clips into seperate tracks you don't have to standardize the
video parameters or establish chapter points and TDA will still give
you a menu even if you have to use a different remote]. Now use TDA
to make your DVD and specify only a "Track Menu" and no "Main Menu".
You will end up with a DVD with only one VTS which responds to your
"Menu Key". [ie, TDA's "Track Menu" is a "Root Menu" for the VTS
involved.]. And no multiple key presses required either.

PEBKAC. The DVD virtual machine does not provide IBM's extended
instruction set with CBVD and PII instructions. You expect to use
a CPATCB, that doesn't exist either. If you want the results, YOU
must expend the necessary effort to get them.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Ken Maltby
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-16-2006

"Buchetamo" <> wrote in message
news:44926db0$0$22364$ u...
>
>>

> Hello Ken,
> Sorry to intrude but I need your help & would appreciate your guidance: I
> have installed in my computer
> TMPGEnc Author 1.6 & I've thinking to upgrade to TMPGEnc Author 2.0 ($59),
> but
> I've been following your "announcement" on the release of TMPGEnc 4.0
> Xpress ($79); perhaps I'm not the only one, but I'm confused: what is the
> difference here? is the upgrade to Author 2.0 a waste of money when for
> $20 extra you can get 4.0 Xpress? Thanks in advance...
> Buchetamo
>
>


The TMPGEnc 4.0 Xpress is a new encoder similar to their
TMPGEnc 3.0 Xpress but with some additional "editing"/filter
capabilities and the inclusion of the "Main Concept" H264
codec and official "DivX" support. ( I was hoping their
implementation of "Main Concept's" encoder would have
improved it some, but I still prefer the results of the free "x264"
codec, fortunately 4.0 Xpress appears to do "x264" at least as
well as 3.0 Xpress does. )

( The only AVC/H264 encode codec that I have found to provide
any better results [than "x264"] is the "Elecard" codec but I haven't
found a way to purchase just the codec or a version that well work
with a reliable encoder program.)


The Author 2.0 is the new version of TDA, I haven't tried it out
as a small protest to the use of "phone home" authentication. The
new features in TDA 2.0 may be worth the upgrade, but I haven't
seen anything that attracts me enough to do the "upgrade". The
combination of VideoReDo and TDA 1.6 allows me a workflow
and flexibility that meets my needs very well.

I can be distracted by a bunch of new "Bells & Whistles", as much
as the next guy, but it doesn't take too long before the "Gee isn't it
neat that it can do ...!" wears off and I come to the realization I don't
need that feature to do what I want.

It may just be me, but I prefer separate straight forward tools that
produce reliable results I can combine with the results of other such
tools and create the video I want. Programs that combine too many
functions or try to "Do it all" are not very helpful, from my point of
view. For instance, I often use a Video Editing program to construct
motion menu backgrounds, but would never author a DVD with a
video editor's authoring function.

Luck;
Ken



 
Reply With Quote
 
Ken Maltby
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-16-2006

<> wrote in message
news: oups.com...

>
> PEBKAC. The DVD virtual machine does not provide IBM's extended
> instruction set with CBVD and PII instructions. You expect to use
> a CPATCB, that doesn't exist either. If you want the results, YOU
> must expend the necessary effort to get them.
>


As interesting as I've found the current DVD specifications and the
Virtual Machine Command set that it makes use of, we could be in its
last days. The new HD-DVD standards will have us all brushing up
on our XML skills. Fortunately, even our friend "Bob" should find
XML easy to grasp.

Luck;
Ken


 
Reply With Quote
 
Bob
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-16-2006
On 16 Jun 2006 09:03:03 -0700, wrote:

>Yet here you are bitching about TDA when it is quite obvious you
>have neither taken the time to understand it or DVDs in general.


Why should I have to? TDA is supposed to be a 1-click solution.

>> Clearly the author of TDA did not understand American remote
>> menus. -- Bob


>To the contrary, it is you who do not understand.


Indeed. And I do not want to understand.

>>> BTW, what is the make and model of this remote? -- me


>> URC 8910 http://www.ofausa.com/remote.php?type=URC%208910 -- Bob


>OK, this beastie tries to control a multitude of devices. It
>provides four "learning keys" L1-L4. When you enter the codes
>for your DVD player, what functions do they perform?


Most other keys are reprogrammable.

>I suspect that at least
>three of those keys were mapped to invoke the "Angle Menu", the
>"Subtitle Menu", and the "Audio Menu" to provide the functions
>contained on most remotes accompanying a DVD player.


I get the same response from the original remote, so it is not
misprogramming.

>>> If you will download and install PgcEdit and drop me an e-mail,
>>> I will step you thru the procedure to create a "Root Menu" for
>>> each VTS which does nothing but invoke your "Title Menu". -- me


>> Thanks, but I rarely use TDA. I am into AVIs. -- Bob


>So you'd rather bitch than learn enough to solve YOUR problem.


You are the one doing all the bitching. Just listen to you -
everything out of your mouth is a personal attack on me.

>> I am concerned that the DVD does not operate the way commercial
>> DVDs operate. -- Bob


>But it does; the DVD goes precisely to where you tell it when you
>press the "Menu Key" which is NOWHERE because YOU fail to provide
>a location to go. If you used "Track Menus", they would respond to
>your "Menu Key". See below.


No one ever said anything about that.

>I repeat my earlier assessment that you are a one click
>wonder who demands instant comfort.


You got that right.

>> Is it asking too much that the author of TDA fix his s/w so that
>> DVDs produced by it behave the same as commercial DVDs?
>> Apparently it is. -- Bob


>I agree. If you would take the time to understand DVD structure and
>player operation, you wouldn't have such naive expectations.


But I am a 1-click wonder who does not want to learn any more that it
takes to produce a DVD that works like the commercial ones.

>Lastly, why are you putting your clips in seperate tracks?


Because that is how people recommended I do it.


--

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible
will make violent revolution inevitable."
--Sun Tzu
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bob
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-16-2006
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:41:32 -0500, "Ken Maltby"
<> wrote:

>even our friend "Bob" should find XML easy to grasp.


Having built three-tier e-commerce systems for the oil and gas
industry, you would be correct in that assessment. But I am retired
and do not care to indulge in such arcane minutae anymore. I am a
1-Click Pony (TM) who wants instant gratification.

Anyway, AVI is going to overtake optical recording for people like us.
Who needs all that silly menu crap anyway. I can burn 10 episodes of a
42 minute show on a DVD (at 1/2 CD resolution) and play them
immediately without wasting time fooling with what the word "menu"
means.



--

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible
will make violent revolution inevitable."
--Sun Tzu
 
Reply With Quote
 
Ken Maltby
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-16-2006

"Bob" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:41:32 -0500, "Ken Maltby"
> <> wrote:
>
>>even our friend "Bob" should find XML easy to grasp.

>
> Having built three-tier e-commerce systems for the oil and gas
> industry, you would be correct in that assessment. But I am retired
> and do not care to indulge in such arcane minutae anymore. I am a
> 1-Click Pony (TM) who wants instant gratification.
>
> Anyway, AVI is going to overtake optical recording for people like us.
> Who needs all that silly menu crap anyway. I can burn 10 episodes of a
> 42 minute show on a DVD (at 1/2 CD resolution) and play them
> immediately without wasting time fooling with what the word "menu"
> means.
>


At the moment I am compiling my Audio & Video collections into
NAS that allows me to play anything from a HTPC on my Gigabit
LAN ( or any other computer ). I am using DVD storage as a
backup for the most part now. I am using x264 AVC/H264 in
"Main Profile" to store full D1 resolution video at a rate that fits
about the same 10 or 11 episodes in the equivalent space of a DVD.

It is also in files with an "AVI" extension. But your last paragraph
makes no sense. You obviously do not understand the meaning of
the term "AVI", and have given it a new meaning all your own.
( And what the heck is "1/2 CD resolution"?)

Luck;
Ken





 
Reply With Quote
 
Buchetamo
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-17-2006

"Ken Maltby" <> wrote in message
news: ...
>
> "Buchetamo" <> wrote in message
> news:44926db0$0$22364$ u...
>>
>>>

>> Hello Ken,
>> Sorry to intrude but I need your help & would appreciate your guidance: I
>> have installed in my computer
>> TMPGEnc Author 1.6 & I've thinking to upgrade to TMPGEnc Author 2.0
>> ($59), but
>> I've been following your "announcement" on the release of TMPGEnc 4.0
>> Xpress ($79); perhaps I'm not the only one, but I'm confused: what is the
>> difference here? is the upgrade to Author 2.0 a waste of money when for
>> $20 extra you can get 4.0 Xpress? Thanks in advance...
>> Buchetamo
>>
>>

>
> The TMPGEnc 4.0 Xpress is a new encoder similar to their
> TMPGEnc 3.0 Xpress but with some additional "editing"/filter
> capabilities and the inclusion of the "Main Concept" H264
> codec and official "DivX" support. ( I was hoping their
> implementation of "Main Concept's" encoder would have
> improved it some, but I still prefer the results of the free "x264"
> codec, fortunately 4.0 Xpress appears to do "x264" at least as
> well as 3.0 Xpress does. )
>
> ( The only AVC/H264 encode codec that I have found to provide
> any better results [than "x264"] is the "Elecard" codec but I haven't
> found a way to purchase just the codec or a version that well work
> with a reliable encoder program.)
>
>
> The Author 2.0 is the new version of TDA, I haven't tried it out
> as a small protest to the use of "phone home" authentication. The
> new features in TDA 2.0 may be worth the upgrade, but I haven't
> seen anything that attracts me enough to do the "upgrade". The
> combination of VideoReDo and TDA 1.6 allows me a workflow
> and flexibility that meets my needs very well.
>
> I can be distracted by a bunch of new "Bells & Whistles", as much
> as the next guy, but it doesn't take too long before the "Gee isn't it
> neat that it can do ...!" wears off and I come to the realization I don't
> need that feature to do what I want.
>
> It may just be me, but I prefer separate straight forward tools that
> produce reliable results I can combine with the results of other such
> tools and create the video I want. Programs that combine too many
> functions or try to "Do it all" are not very helpful, from my point of
> view. For instance, I often use a Video Editing program to construct
> motion menu backgrounds, but would never author a DVD with a
> video editor's authoring function.
>
> Luck;
> Ken
>
>
>Thanks Ken, that's good enough for me. I won't upgrade, it's not worth it &
>I also agree with the protest re: phone authentication & in fact I'm a
>"victim" since I bought their TMPGEnc MPEG Editor 2.0 & had to toe the
>line...



 
Reply With Quote
 
JimK
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-17-2006
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:54:56 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

>On 15 Jun 2006 22:02:11 -0700, wrote:
>
>>It's behavior is also
>>obnoxious in that it requires multiple presses to start play and
>>multiple presses to return to what you call your "Main Menu".

>
>Clrearly the author of TDA did not understand American remote menus.


TDA is very well thought out.

The OP has 'menu display settings | General | Main Menu and Track
Menu' checked

Check 'menu display settings | General | Only Main Menu'

if you don't want to use Track Menu, un-check it.





>
>>> Maybe I need to reprogram my remote to the "Title" button and leave
>>> the "Menu" button off. -- Bob

>
>>NO!!!!! You will mess up your remote's behavior with commercial DVDs.

>
>Yep, I found out yesterday when I started a commercial DVD with Title.
>It plays all the crap in front - the FBI tonguewagging, the flying
>logos, all the crap you don't want to see ever again.
>
>>BTW, what is the make and model of this remote?

>
>URC 8910
>
>http://www.ofausa.com/remote.php?type=URC%208910
>
>>There is not a simple one step solution to your problem, but there is
>>a solution. If you will download and install PgcEdit and drop me an
>>e-mail, I will step you thru the procedure to create a "Root Menu" for
>>each VTS which does nothing but invoke your "Title Menu". That way
>>you won't have to foul up your remote's behavior with commercial DVDs
>>and your Menu key will reach the "Main/Top" menu which TDA created.
>>OTOH it is a PITA.

>
>Thanks, but I rarely use TDA. I am into AVIs.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TDA doesn't preserve subtitles Bob DVD Video 10 02-04-2006 12:48 PM
Horizontal Menu and Sub menu in asp.net 2.0 itzikkl ASP .Net 0 03-27-2005 12:50 PM
Menu and sub-menu in asp.net as windows menus made with vb, delphi, etc..? Vilmar ASP .Net 0 05-27-2004 05:52 PM
Jump Menu (DropDown Menu) in ASP.net. Can someone help me out? Miguel Dias Moura ASP .Net 3 04-03-2004 08:17 AM
menu problem / Cool menu Chancel Javascript 0 09-25-2003 07:55 PM



Advertisments