Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > cisco6509 route-map config

Reply
Thread Tools

cisco6509 route-map config

 
 
Craig D. Rice
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-14-2003
We are trying to set up a VLAN for wireless nodes and want to apply
some access-lists to it. Unfortunately, because the 6509 does not
process access-lists between VLANs (switching takes place in hardware,
and the 6509 does not support ACL matching at the MSFC level --
verified with TAC), we want to send all local traffic from this VLAN
off the 6509 to another router. We will apply the access lists on
this router, then send permitted traffic back to the 6509. (Yes, a
kludge. -- Alternative suggestions most welcome!)

We tried configuring policy-based routing -- it looks like it should
do the trick, but for some reason, it's not working...

Our "wireless VLAN" (VLAN52) is on the 6509: 130.71.248.0/21 (so the
valid IP address in this subnetwork are 130.71.248.1-130.71.255.254).

We set up a spare Cisco 4500 router with two ethernet interfaces; we
set up two new VLANs (63 and 64) on the 6509 as follows:

+---------------+ +----------------+
|Cisco ETH0 |-130.71.246.2---130.71.246.1-| Vlan63 Cisco|
|4500 ETH1 |-130.71.247.2---130.71.247.1-| Vlan64 6509|
+---------------+ +----------------+
|VLAN52
(130.71.248/21)
|
X Node: 130.71.255.254

We then ping'd from 130.71.255.254 (a node on VLAN52) to a node in our
network, but the traffic stays on the 6509; the route-map is not
effective.

Cisco4500:

130.71.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C 130.71.247.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1
C 130.71.246.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 130.71.247.1

We have verified IP connectivity from everywhere to 130.71.246.2 and
130.71.247.2.

Cisco 6509:

interface Vlan63
ip address 130.71.246.1 255.255.255.0
ip broadcast-address 130.71.246.255

interface Vlan64
ip address 130.71.247.1 255.255.255.0
ip broadcast-address 130.71.247.255

access-list 111 permit ip 130.71.248.0 0.0.7.255 any
(we also tried "access-list 111 permit ip any any")

route-map STOWLAN permit 11
match ip address 111
(we also tried without the "match ip address 111")
set ip next-hop 130.71.246.2
(we also tried "set ip default next-hop 130.71.246.2)

interface Vlan52
ip address 130.71.248.1 255.255.248.0
ip broadcast-address 130.71.255.255
ip helper-address 130.71.128.8
no ip mroute-cache
ip policy route-map STOWLAN

We turned on "debug ip packet detail" on the Cisco 4500, but it sees
no traffic we originate from our test node.

If it's relevant, right after putting in: "ip policy route-map
STOWLAN" on vlan52, we did get:

*Jan 16 20:07:32 CST: %FM-2-TCAM_ERROR: TCAM programming error 18

IOS version details are below.

Should this approach work? If so, any suggestions why it's not
working?

Craig
--
Craig D. Rice Associate Director of Information Systems
cdr at stolaf.edu Information and Instructional Technologies
+1 507 646-3631 St. Olaf College
+1 507 646-3096 FAX 1510 St. Olaf Avenue
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/cdr Northfield, MN 55057-1097 USA

----- show vers for cisco 6509 -----

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) MSFC Software (C6MSFC-DSV-M), Version 12.1(8b)E15, EARLY
DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 18-Jul-03 00:05 by hqluong
Image text-base: 0x60008950, data-base: 0x616BA000

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(3)XE, RELEASE SOFTWARE
BOOTFLASH: MSFC Software (C6MSFC-DSV-M), Version 12.1(8b)E15, EARLY
DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

cisco6509 uptime is 2 weeks, 2 days, 2 hours, 40 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System image file is "bootflash:c6msfc-dsv-mz.121-8b.E15"

cisco Cat6k-MSFC (R5000) processor with 114688K/16384K bytes of
memory.
Processor board ID SAD04240N0U
R5000 CPU at 200Mhz, Implementation 35, Rev 2.1, 512KB L2 Cache
Last reset from power-on
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
53 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
123K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
4096K bytes of packet SRAM memory.

16384K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K).
Configuration register is 0x2101

----- show vers for cisco 4500 -----

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 4500 Software (C4500-I-M), Version 12.0(9), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 25-Jan-00 04:22 by bettyl
Image text-base: 0x60008930, data-base: 0x606CE000

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.1(1) [daveu 1], RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
BOOTFLASH: 4500-XBOOT Bootstrap Software, Version 10.1(1), RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc1)

cisco4500.stolaf.edu uptime is 1 hour, 16 minutes
System restarted by reload
System image file is "flash:c4500-i-mz_120-9.bin"

cisco 4500 (R4K) processor (revision 0x00) with 32768K/4096K bytes of
memory.
Processor board ID 01387457
R4600 processor, Implementation 32, Revision 1.0
G.703/E1 software, Version 1.0.
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
2 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
4 Serial network interface(s)
128K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)
4096K bytes of processor board Boot flash (Read/Write)

Configuration register is 0x2102
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Terry Baranski
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-15-2003
On 14 Nov 2003 08:18:43 -0800, (Craig D. Rice) wrote:

>We are trying to set up a VLAN for wireless nodes and want to apply
>some access-lists to it. Unfortunately, because the 6509 does not
>process access-lists between VLANs (switching takes place in hardware,
>and the 6509 does not support ACL matching at the MSFC level --
>verified with TAC), we want to send all local traffic from this VLAN
>off the 6509 to another router. We will apply the access lists on
>this router, then send permitted traffic back to the 6509. (Yes, a
>kludge. -- Alternative suggestions most welcome!)


6509's can filter inter-VLAN traffic just fine. I've done it without
issue.

-Terry
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Andre Beck
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-15-2003
Terry Baranski <0VE> writes:
> On 14 Nov 2003 08:18:43 -0800, (Craig D. Rice) wrote:
>
> >We are trying to set up a VLAN for wireless nodes and want to apply
> >some access-lists to it. Unfortunately, because the 6509 does not
> >process access-lists between VLANs (switching takes place in hardware,
> >and the 6509 does not support ACL matching at the MSFC level --
> >verified with TAC), we want to send all local traffic from this VLAN
> >off the 6509 to another router. We will apply the access lists on
> >this router, then send permitted traffic back to the 6509. (Yes, a
> >kludge. -- Alternative suggestions most welcome!)

>
> 6509's can filter inter-VLAN traffic just fine. I've done it without
> issue.


6509s are just chassis. What processors are we speaking of? I would
expect the SUP2+MSFC2+PFC2 can ACL just fine (I'd get really annoyed
if it wouldn't), but the MSFC mentioned by the original poster might
be different. Their L3 switching approach (MLS) is different, I was
assured here.

If it is this way, the resolution would either be to upgrade the CPUs
to some that can do ACLs properly, or indeed to use an external router
to do it for them. A 3750 might fit quite nicely (however I'm not fully
aware to the quality of ACL support you get on them).

--
The _S_anta _C_laus _O_peration
or "how to turn a complete illusion into a neverending money source"

-> Andre "ABPSoft" Beck +++ ABP-RIPE +++ Dresden, Germany, Spacetime <-
 
Reply With Quote
 
Terry Baranski
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-16-2003
On 15 Nov 2003 20:39:12 +0100, Andre Beck <> wrote:

>Terry Baranski <0VE> writes:
>> On 14 Nov 2003 08:18:43 -0800, (Craig D. Rice) wrote:
>>
>> >We are trying to set up a VLAN for wireless nodes and want to apply
>> >some access-lists to it. Unfortunately, because the 6509 does not
>> >process access-lists between VLANs (switching takes place in hardware,
>> >and the 6509 does not support ACL matching at the MSFC level --
>> >verified with TAC), we want to send all local traffic from this VLAN
>> >off the 6509 to another router. We will apply the access lists on
>> >this router, then send permitted traffic back to the 6509. (Yes, a
>> >kludge. -- Alternative suggestions most welcome!)

>>
>> 6509's can filter inter-VLAN traffic just fine. I've done it without
>> issue.

>
>6509s are just chassis. What processors are we speaking of? I would
>expect the SUP2+MSFC2+PFC2 can ACL just fine (I'd get really annoyed
>if it wouldn't), but the MSFC mentioned by the original poster might
>be different. Their L3 switching approach (MLS) is different, I was
>assured here.


MLS is different but ACL's still work when it's being used.

-Terry
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dll config and web.config and Label Expressions (binding label text to dll config settings) CSharpner ASP .Net 0 04-09-2007 09:00 PM
can not save running-config to startup-config. AM Cisco 2 11-14-2005 02:22 PM
"copy running-config startup-config" simultaneously vstots@gmail.com Cisco 4 03-10-2005 06:04 AM
Machine.config & web.config =?Utf-8?B?RGFuaWVs?= ASP .Net 2 01-18-2004 08:06 PM
Default Config Files or Basic Config Steve Marshall Cisco 2 11-05-2003 10:25 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57