![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
MCSE - Can I use swticher instead of router in this case? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
I don't quite understand when I read the following paragrpahy on Microsoft
Training Kit. ------- Suppose you are designing a campus network with 200 host spead over four buildings - Voter Hall, Twilight Hall, Monore Hall, and Sunderland Hall. You want each of these four buildings to include 50 hosts. If you ISP has allocated to you the Class C network 208.147.66.0, you can use the addresses 208.147.66.1-208.147.66.254 for your 200 hosts. However, because these hosts are distributed among four physically separate locations, these hosts are not all able to communicate with each other by means of local network broadcast. By extending the subnet mask and borrowing 2 bits from the host ID portion of your address space, you can divide the network into four logical subnets. You can then use a router to connect the four physcial networks. -------- I wonder if I can use a switcher instead of a router to connect other 4 switchers sitting on each building. Take the above scenario as an example, the subnet mask is /28 (255.255.255.240). I guess that the adoption of a router may bring the following advantages: 1. support accessibility of varied subnets. 2. reduce network traffic due to the decrease of the number of subnet's hosts (default is 254, and it is 62 in this case) I still not very clear “broadcast” in TCP/IP. When a host sends a data package, if the destined host is in the same subnet as sender host, the data package would be broadcasted in the subnet. Does it imply that the smaller number of hosts in a subnet will bring more efficiency? Tell me something if I missed. Thank you. -- Self-Studying =?Utf-8?B?QWFyb24=?= |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
You should upgrade the switcher to a switcher-oony
That is all. -- Mostly Gizzards A+ Network+ MCSE 2003 "Aaron" <> wrote in message news:661112B9-DD1E-4C33-BDFF-... >I don't quite understand when I read the following paragrpahy on Microsoft > Training Kit. > > ------- > Suppose you are designing a campus network with 200 host spead over four > buildings - Voter Hall, Twilight Hall, Monore Hall, and Sunderland Hall. > You > want each of these four buildings to include 50 hosts. If you ISP has > allocated to you the Class C network 208.147.66.0, you can use the > addresses > 208.147.66.1-208.147.66.254 for your 200 hosts. However, because these > hosts > are distributed among four physically separate locations, these hosts are > not > all able to communicate with each other by means of local network > broadcast. > By extending the subnet mask and borrowing 2 bits from the host ID portion > of > your address space, you can divide the network into four logical subnets. > You > can then use a router to connect the four physcial networks. > -------- > > I wonder if I can use a switcher instead of a router to connect other 4 > switchers sitting on each building. > > Take the above scenario as an example, the subnet mask is /28 > (255.255.255.240). > > I guess that the adoption of a router may bring the following advantages: > 1. support accessibility of varied subnets. > 2. reduce network traffic due to the decrease of the number of subnet's > hosts (default is 254, and it is 62 in this case) > > I still not very clear "broadcast" in TCP/IP. When a host sends a data > package, if the destined host is in the same subnet as sender host, the > data > package would be broadcasted in the subnet. > Does it imply that the smaller number of hosts in a subnet will bring more > efficiency? > > Tell me something if I missed. > > Thank you. > > -- > Self-Studying |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
if one pc sends data to another pc in its own subnet, this data is cought by the switch, the pcs are connected to. if the switch (they are some intelligent to learn with the traffic on which port a pc is connected) does not know where the destination pc is located / on which port is connected, it has to send the data to all ports (pc's), too to the upper switches and so to the next buildings to make possible to reach even this pc's. Then ALL lines in all buildings are busy (broadcast) ! If you have a router on top, the router get the data from the building's switch but can decide whether the data is to send to another building or not. If not (when data goes to pc in same/building's subnet), then the lines of 3 buildings are not busy / free for their own traffic. regards jk |
|