«

Tracker Spilled my beer when they jumped on the table and proclaimed
in <>:
<snip>

> Plenty of my knowledge has been posted and none of it was debunked.

It was debunked. Selective memory there?

> If knowledgeable people made corrected statements to show error,
> than the whole computer world would benefit.

They did speak. Selective memory once again? Or, are you purposely
not remembering that because it conflicts with your twisted version
of reality?

<Remaining crap snipped>


NOI

>
> The Trackers are working on a response to this as we speak. It's riding
> season so bare with me.
>
> Tracker

Picturing Beef in nothing but a cowboy hat, boots and spurs, riding Debbie
off into the sunset with a "Yipee yaaa kaiii aaaa." Sorry for the western
moment, I shall go gag now.

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 15:06:41 +0400, Tracker
<"snailmail222000"@yahoo.com> wrote:

>I’ve yet to find a person to dispute my knowledge.

I dispute it - you are full of ****.

--
Arthur Person.

Tracker Spilled my beer when they jumped on the table and proclaimed
in <>:
> I’ve yet to find a person to dispute my knowledge. In order for
> anyone to do so, they would need to provide my statement, how it’s
> incorrect and how
> to correct the problem the correct way. No takers have challenged
> any of my statements with these above answers.

So, you missed every message that Jimchip, JP, Mimic, Flaag, Don,
myself, and dozens more have posted on that topic?

> Send me the money and I’ll send you a copy of my book. Snake oil
> went out with the pioneers and indians.

No thanks. I'm not that big of an insomniac. <G>

NOI

Tracker <"snailmail(remove/valid)222000"@yahoo.com> wrote in
news::

> I’ve yet to find a person to dispute my knowledge. In order for
> anyone to do so, they would need to provide my statement, how it’s
> incorrect and how to correct the problem the correct way. No takers
> have challenged any of my statements with these above answers.

Are you so flippant as to ignore the responses I and so many others have
posted as challenges and disputes? Why do you constantly sidestep the
issues at hand? By what right do you declare yourself keeper and
purveyor of knowledge when you refuse to demonstrate any of that
knowledge?

Since you have posed many questions here, allow me to pose one or two.
If you answer correctly, I will recant any doubts I had about your level
of knowledge:

While operating my computer on the internet, it slows to a crawl.
Nothing seems to function and the hard drive light is lit solid.
My AV program icon shows it's running, and both firewalls are
operational. What kind of a vulnerability has been exploited?

Everyone else, please let Debbie answer this.


>
> Send me the money and I’ll send you a copy of my book. Snake oil went
> out with the pioneers and indians.

I'm sorry, but you still did not answer any of my questions in this
regard. Please review them and respond.

A Person Spilled my beer when they jumped on the table and proclaimed
in <>:

> On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 15:06:41 +0400, Tracker
> <"snailmail222000"@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>I’ve yet to find a person to dispute my knowledge.
>
> I dispute it - you are full of ****.

Lol. Direct and to the point. <G>

NOI

You sure helped them computer users. Sorry you have nothing else to do
in your life.

Tracker

A Person wrote:

> On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 15:06:41 +0400, Tracker
> <"snailmail222000"@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >I’ve yet to find a person to dispute my knowledge.
>
> I dispute it - you are full of ****.
>
> --
> Arthur Person.

<> wrote in message
news:Xns93E9C00E2F1A1n1pophotmailcom@130.133.1.4.. .
> Tracker <"snailmail(remove/valid)222000"@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news::
>
> > I've yet to find a person to dispute my knowledge. In order for
> > anyone to do so, they would need to provide my statement, how it's
> > incorrect and how to correct the problem the correct way. No takers
> > have challenged any of my statements with these above answers.
>
> Are you so flippant as to ignore the responses I and so many others have
> posted as challenges and disputes? Why do you constantly sidestep the
> issues at hand? By what right do you declare yourself keeper and
> purveyor of knowledge when you refuse to demonstrate any of that
> knowledge?
>
> Since you have posed many questions here, allow me to pose one or two.
> If you answer correctly, I will recant any doubts I had about your level
> of knowledge:
>

Just for Trackers reference : www.dictionary.com

come on, we gotta give her a chance. ;P

--
Mimic

"Without Knowledge you have fear, With fear you create your own nightmares."
"There are 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand Binary,
and those that dont."

Tracker <"snailmail(remove/valid)222000"@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>
>> >I’ve yet to find a person to dispute my knowledge.
>>
>> I dispute it - you are full of ****.
>>
>> --
>> Arthur Person.


Sorry to come into this late, but the posts with the actual issues are long
since gone. What exactly are the claims you are making?