Anyone has different ideas about this?
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/06/06/...le.html?page=2
which recommend to use "qualified" instead of "unqualified"
Mavis wrote:
> Unqualified element in XSD definition
>
> For some reason, we may need to define elements in XSD to be
> "unqualified".
>
> According to the design patterns of XSD, it seems they do not recommend
> to define elements in this way....it seems it will influence XPATH /
> XSLT, etc...
>
> Anyone has any experience on this? Any problem will be caused by
> unqualified elements?
>
> Thanks a lot for your advices!