Roger,
10.x.x.x is not routeable. if that is being passed to Internet it
will fail. To verify I would turn off fast switching (no ip
route-cache) on 3600 and debug packets to verify 10.x.x.x network is
being oassed to Internet. If so, NAT is your solution.
Aaron
(Roger) wrote in message news:<. com>...
> We have a Cisco 2600 supplied by our isp providing access to the
> internet.
>
> It has 2 interfaces Serial0 and TokenRing0
>
> Serial0 is 158.*.*.* address and Token Ring0 is 193.133.*.* address.
>
> We have a checkpoint firewall on Token Ring which then goes to a 3600
> router.
>
> for Token Ring translation into our corportate Ethernet lan.
>
> This all works fine, I have been tasked to put in a dirty internet
> connection for contractors plugging in beneath the isp router.
>
> I need to configure a 3600 for token ring translation I have set up
> the hardware and from my 3600 doing TR translation I can ping the
> internet. The address on the TR side of my 3600 is one of our reserved
> 193.133 addresses.
> The rules on the isp router obviously let this through,
>
> When I plug a pc beneath the router on a 10.6.*.* address and ping the
> internet it won't jump the router and gets stuck.
>
> Is this because I am trying to pass a 10.6.** address to the internet-
> do i need to do some NAT - is the isp router blocking anything from
> 10.6
>
> Is this a crazy idea - am I mad...
>
> Roger
> UK