Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > VOIP > delay of 70ms

Reply
Thread Tools

delay of 70ms

 
 
bob@coolgroups.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-28-2006
I have a pair of Cisco 3725 routers that I'm talking through
using VOIP. I measured a mouth to ear delay of 70ms with a
standard config. Is this what I should be getting? Is there a way
to make the delay 0?

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
R-Guy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-28-2006
<> wrote in message
news: oups.com...
>I have a pair of Cisco 3725 routers that I'm talking through
> using VOIP. I measured a mouth to ear delay of 70ms with a
> standard config. Is this what I should be getting? Is there a way
> to make the delay 0?
>


Are they connected by LAN or WAN?
What codec and packetization period are you using?
What type of voice terminal are you using?


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
bob@coolgroups.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-29-2006
LAN,

G.711 ulaw 20ms,

standard POTS phone


R-Guy wrote:
> <> wrote in message
> news: oups.com...
> >I have a pair of Cisco 3725 routers that I'm talking through
> > using VOIP. I measured a mouth to ear delay of 70ms with a
> > standard config. Is this what I should be getting? Is there a way
> > to make the delay 0?
> >

>
> Are they connected by LAN or WAN?
> What codec and packetization period are you using?
> What type of voice terminal are you using?


 
Reply With Quote
 
Stephen Sprunk
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-29-2006
<> wrote in message
news: oups.com...
> R-Guy wrote:
>> <> wrote in message
>> news: oups.com...
>> >I have a pair of Cisco 3725 routers that I'm talking through
>> > using VOIP. I measured a mouth to ear delay of 70ms with a
>> > standard config. Is this what I should be getting? Is there a way
>> > to make the delay 0?
>> >

>>
>> Are they connected by LAN or WAN?
>> What codec and packetization period are you using?
>> What type of voice terminal are you using?

>
> LAN,
>
> G.711 ulaw 20ms,
>
> standard POTS phone


With 20ms packetization, it will be impossible to get less than 20ms delay,
because that's how much data the gateway has to collect before sending a
packet. There's also typically 10-20ms burned in the codec/DSP's pipeline.
On top of that, the receiver's jitter buffer will add a few tens of ms; most
jitter buffers, even adaptive ones, are tuned with a minimum of a few tens
of ms because it doesn't hurt, and 40ms or so of buffering will hide all but
the worst unless you have no QoS at all over a skinny WAN pipe.

70ms isn't bad, and no human should ever notice it. Don't worry about
latency until it hits 150ms.

S

--
Stephen Sprunk "Stupid people surround themselves with smart
CCIE #3723 people. Smart people surround themselves with
K5SSS smart people who disagree with them." --Aaron Sorkin


*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculating propagation delay & transmission delay Stone Cisco 1 09-27-2006 06:26 PM
Network drive delay =?Utf-8?B?YWRr?= Wireless Networking 1 07-09-2005 06:57 PM
nglayout.initialpaint.delay Herb Firefox 7 02-06-2005 12:28 PM
Thunderbird's mailnews.mark_message_read.delay.interval setting Larry__Weiss Firefox 1 01-27-2005 10:50 PM
Delay of control signals Ingmar Seifert VHDL 0 08-18-2003 03:21 PM



Advertisments