Embed image data in HTML

I'm looking for suggestions on embedding image data in HTML documents.
The solution has to work in IE7, so data schemes won't work. I'm sure
more of the replies will mention it anyway, but please, I'm looking for
other solutions.
Thanks,

Randy Charles Morin
http://www.kbcafe.com/csharp/

Randy Charles Morin

Randy Charles Morin <> scripsit:

> I'm looking for suggestions on embedding image data in HTML documents.

Don't do that.

> The solution has to work in IE7, so data schemes won't work.

Well, they were a questionable idea from the beginning.

> I'm looking for other solutions.

You should look for other problems. Clearly when you are in a dead end,
where you have described a problem that has no solution, you should
backtrack to the point where you formulated the problem.

What was the original problem that made you think you want to embed image
data in a data format for text?

--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

In article <FsKcg.5569$>,
"Jukka K. Korpela" <> wrote:

> You should look for other problems. Clearly when you are in a dead end,
> where you have described a problem that has no solution, you should
> backtrack to the point where you formulated the problem.

I could swear my shrink said this at some stage?

--
dorayme

dorayme wrote:

> I could swear my shrink said this at some stage?

Why are you asking? You'd be the one in the best position to know.

--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Coming Soon: Filtering rules specific to various real news clients

In article <>,
Blinky the Shark <> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
>
> > I could swear my shrink said this at some stage?
>
> Why are you asking? You'd be the one in the best position to know.

I wasn't asking.

A common mistake, to be misled by "?"s. We need webcam newsgroups
where we can make er.. er... hand signals to each other...

--
dorayme

dorayme wrote:
> In article <>,
> Blinky the Shark <> wrote:
>
>> dorayme wrote:
>>
>> > I could swear my shrink said this at some stage?
>>
>> Why are you asking? You'd be the one in the best position to know.
>
> I wasn't asking.

Your question mark says you were.

> A common mistake, to be misled by "?"s. We need webcam newsgroups
> where we can make er.. er... hand signals to each other...

No, we just need to have a clue about writing.

--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Coming Soon: Filtering rules specific to various real news clients

In article <>,
Blinky the Shark <> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
> > In article <>,
> > Blinky the Shark <> wrote:
> >
> >> dorayme wrote:
> >>
> >> > I could swear my shrink said this at some stage?
> >>
> >> Why are you asking? You'd be the one in the best position to know.
> >
> > I wasn't asking.
>
> Your question mark says you were.
>
> > A common mistake, to be misled by "?"s. We need webcam newsgroups
> > where we can make er.. er... hand signals to each other...
>
> No, we just need to have a clue about writing.

Writing is not the only point here. There is a question about how
you read even less than perfect earthly ways of expression.

"...?" is not necessarily a normal question with a true or false
answer nor one that requires or seeks an answer, even a vague
one. Nor does the act of a person "asking" what might have
transpired in private between that person and another mean that
one or both of the is in the best position to judge.

--
dorayme

dorayme wrote:
> In article <>,
> Blinky the Shark <> wrote:
>
>> dorayme wrote:
>> > In article <>,
>> > Blinky the Shark <> wrote:
>> >
>> >> dorayme wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I could swear my shrink said this at some stage?
>> >>
>> >> Why are you asking? You'd be the one in the best position to know.
>> >
>> > I wasn't asking.
>>
>> Your question mark says you were.
>>
>> > A common mistake, to be misled by "?"s. We need webcam newsgroups
>> > where we can make er.. er... hand signals to each other...
>>
>> No, we just need to have a clue about writing.
>
> Writing is not the only point here. There is a question about how
> you read even less than perfect earthly ways of expression.

It was my point.

> "...?" is not necessarily a normal question with a true or false
> answer nor one that requires or seeks an answer, even a vague

That is true; some of them are rhetorical questions not normal
questions. Yours was a declarative statement with a misapplied question
mark.

> one. Nor does the act of a person "asking" what might have
> transpired in private between that person and another mean that
> one or both of the is in the best position to judge.

Whaatever that means, it wasn't what you did.

--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Coming Soon: Filtering rules specific to various real news clients

In article <>,
Blinky the Shark <> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
> > Blinky the Shark wrote:
> >dorayme wrote:
> >> > Blinky the Shark wrote:
> >> >> dorayme wrote:
> >> >> > I could swear my shrink said this at some stage?
> >> >> Why are you asking? You'd be the one in the best position to know.
> >> > I wasn't asking.
> >> Your question mark says you were.
> >> > A common mistake, to be misled by "?"s. We need webcam newsgroups
> >> > where we can make er.. er... hand signals to each other...
> >> No, we just need to have a clue about writing.
> >
> > Writing is not the only point here. There is a question about how
> > you read even less than perfect earthly ways of expression.
>
> It was my point.
>

You saying "we just need to have a clue about writing" is a funny
way to make this point.

> > "...?" is not necessarily a normal question with a true or false
> > answer nor one that requires or seeks an answer, even a vague
>
> ...Yours was a declarative statement with a misapplied question
> mark.
>

So you say. But it is not true. And it shows you don't understand
or really believe what I said and you claim to have meant. The
question mark had a function. It may not have the function that
you were taught at straight school but it had a meaning and a
point that you should have been able to understand and
appreciate: as a wondering by the writer, a question he or she is
asking him or herself about whether or not his or her shrink did
or did not say something of a certain kind...

> > one. Nor does the act of a person "asking" what might have
> > transpired in private between that person and another mean that
> > one or both of the is in the best position to judge.
>
> Whaatever that means, it wasn't what you did.

If you do not understand this, you cannot know what I did because
context is important (as important as freedom - hi Luigi!) and
everything you say suggests you have too wooden a view. Context
is the life blood of everything. Wake up!

As for what it means, it is relevant to explain this to you as
you seem to take the opposite view "You should know" said you.
The point is simple enough. Sometimes a person can forget or have
good reason to forget things and is not in the best position to
know. Someone who has been informed of this earlier might be in a
better position to know.

--
dorayme

dorayme wrote:
> In article <>,
> Blinky the Shark <> wrote:
>
>> dorayme wrote:
>> > Blinky the Shark wrote:
>> >dorayme wrote:
>> >> > Blinky the Shark wrote:
>> >> >> dorayme wrote:
>> >> >> > I could swear my shrink said this at some stage?
>> >> >> Why are you asking? You'd be the one in the best position to know.
>> >> > I wasn't asking.
>> >> Your question mark says you were.
>> >> > A common mistake, to be misled by "?"s. We need webcam newsgroups
>> >> > where we can make er.. er... hand signals to each other...
>> >> No, we just need to have a clue about writing.
>> >
>> > Writing is not the only point here. There is a question about how
>> > you read even less than perfect earthly ways of expression.
>>
>> It was my point.
>>
>
> You saying "we just need to have a clue about writing" is a funny
> way to make this point.
>
>> > "...?" is not necessarily a normal question with a true or false
>> > answer nor one that requires or seeks an answer, even a vague
>>
>> ...Yours was a declarative statement with a misapplied question
>> mark.
>>
>
> So you say. But it is not true. And it shows you don't understand
> or really believe what I said and you claim to have meant. The
> question mark had a function.

The question mark was misused.

This is one of my pet peves of expression, like its cousin "up-talk", as
in: "We went to the zoo? We saw some animals? I really liked the
bears?"


--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Coming Soon: Filtering rules specific to various real news clients