Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > HTML
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

HTML - object to object -- embed instead

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-21-2006, 07:20 PM   #1
Default object to object -- embed instead


Object is a horrible mess
embed is logical and easy to use
any chance the w3c will pull their heads out from you know where on this?
regards
cw




code_wrong
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2006, 08:09 PM   #2
Spartanicus
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: object to object -- embed instead

"code_wrong" <> wrote:

>Object is a horrible mess
>embed is logical and easy to use
>any chance the w3c will pull their heads out from you know where on this?


What I can say is that the chances of you getting a clue are pretty low.

--
Spartanicus
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2006, 10:09 PM   #3
cwdjrxyz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: object to object -- embed instead


code_wrong wrote:
> Object is a horrible mess
> embed is logical and easy to use


I guess this is a personal value call. I find object much more logical,
unlike embed which is a hangover from the browser war era when Netscape
used the non-standard embed and Microsoft used the non-standard
bgsound. Neither tag has ever been an official part of html. IE
eventually supported embed also.

> any chance the w3c will pull their heads out from you know where on this?


About the same chance that an unknown relative of mine will leave me
one billion US dollars. Fortunately Mozilla family browsers, such as
Firefox, do not support bgsound, but they still support embed. At least
they now do not support their old unofficial document.layers. IE
broweser now support both embed and bgsound and the nonstandard
document.all. Although Opera supports the most modern html and xhtml
correctly, it also supports embed, bgsound, document.all, and other,
mostly Microsoftese tags. All of the current main browsers could stand
some house cleaning, although IE is by far the one most in need of
this. After all, html4 replaced 3.2 very many years ago, and even xhtml
has been around many years now.

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2006, 10:43 PM   #4
Toby Inkster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: object to object -- embed instead

code_wrong wrote:

> Object is a horrible mess
> embed is logical and easy to use


OBJECT is logical and easy to use:

<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
data="my_movie.swf"
height="240"
width="320">
<p>Your browser does not have an appropriate flash
plugin installed/enabled. You may want to try downloading
<a href="my_movie.swf">my movie</a> and viewing it in
an external viewer.</p>
</object>

Not too complicated is it?

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 11:05 PM   #5
code_wrong
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: object to object -- embed instead


"Toby Inkster" <> wrote in message
newsg37k3-...
> code_wrong wrote:
>
>> Object is a horrible mess
>> embed is logical and easy to use

>
> OBJECT is logical and easy to use:
>
> <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
> data="my_movie.swf"
> height="240"
> width="320">
> <p>Your browser does not have an appropriate flash
> plugin installed/enabled. You may want to try downloading
> <a href="my_movie.swf">my movie</a> and viewing it in
> an external viewer.</p>
> </object>
>
> Not too complicated is it?




Hmm maybe but ...


Embed a sound:

<embed src="test.wav" width=60 height=15 autostart="false">

Embed a flash movie:

<embed src="test.swf" height="200" width="200"></embed>

Embed a movie:

<embed src="test.mpg" width="200" height="200">


  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump