![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hello there,
I have just started with XSL-FO and I have the following problem. I am not able to produce the proper pdf file. Here is what I have: http://gdcm.sourceforge.net/test.pdf here is what I should have: http://www.antennahouse.com/XSLsampl...le-table_1.pdf I am working on Debian/linux with fop (apache). To produce test.pdf I did the following: $ history 1 mkdir /tmp/2 2 cd /tmp/2 3 wget http://www.antennahouse.com/XSLsampl...-all-files.zip 4 unzip sample-all-files.zip 5 fop fo/sample-table_1.fo test.pdf and fop execution produced: [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser [INFO] FOP 0.20.5 [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser [INFO] building formatting object tree [INFO] setting up fonts [ERROR] property - "xml:lang" is not implemented yet. [INFO] [1] [INFO] JAI support was not installed (read: not present at build time). Trying to use Jimi instead [INFO] Parsing of document complete, stopping renderer Any comment/suggestion welcome Mathieu mathieu |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Mathieu,
AntenaHouse provides a commercial FO processor supporting much more than Apache FOP. The files from AntennaHouse are probably intended to show the features their processor provide so it is understandable that a processor like Apache FOP may not render them correctly. You may eventually try with the FOP 0.92 beta and see if you get better results: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/re...#FOP+0.92+beta Best Regards, George --------------------------------------------------------------------- George Cristian Bina <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
George Bina wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > AntenaHouse provides a commercial FO processor supporting much more > than Apache FOP. The files from AntennaHouse are probably intended to > show the features their processor provide so it is understandable that > a processor like Apache FOP may not render them correctly. You may > eventually try with the FOP 0.92 beta and see if you get better > results: > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/re...#FOP+0.92+beta Makes perfect sense. Since this was more for test, I'll simply avoid the few tags Apache FOP cannot handle. Thanks for your help! Mathieu |
|