«

hello people,
just wanted to say thanks again for the help in the past. i have a new
problem which am wondering if any body can help me with.

i have written this abtract class shape and its derived class circle,
rectangle and triangle. i have also written this method for each shape
object called 'draw_all_seq_inside2' which takes two values. i want to
call this method using for_each statement in another method but it
doesnt seem to work. this is a trim version of the code. i need to do
this using for_each statement as it is a coursework. please have a look
and get back to me (sorry for the lengthy code but i trimmed it as much
as possible).

#include <vector>
#include <list>
#include <deque>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <complex>
#include <functional>
#include <algorithm>

using namespace std;

class Shape {
protected:
string shapename;
public:
Shape(string name): shapename(name) {};
virtual void draw() const = 0;

virtual void inside_window2(complex<double> &bl, complex<double>
&tr) const = 0;
};

class Circle : public Shape {
public:
const double x1;
const double y1;
const double radius;

Circle(complex<double> first, double rad): Shape("Circle"),
x1(first.real()), y1(first.imag()), radius(rad) {}

void draw() const {
complex<double> first(x1, y1);
cout << "<Shape::" << Shape::shapename << " " << first << " "
<< radius
<< " >\n";
}

void inside_window2(complex<double> &bl, complex<double> &tr) const
{
if((x1 - radius) >= bl.real() && (y1 - radius) >= bl.imag() &&
(x1 + radius) <= tr.real() && (y1 + radius) <= tr.imag()){
draw();
}
}
};

class Rectangle : public Shape {
public:
const double x1;
const double y1;
const double x2;
const double y2;

Rectangle(complex<double> first, complex<double> second):
Shape("Rectangle"), x1(first.real()), y1(first.imag()),
x2(second.real()), y2(second.imag()) {}

void draw() const {
complex<double> first(x1, y1);
complex<double> second(x2, y2);
cout << "<Shape::" << Shape::shapename << " " << first << " "
<< second
<< " >\n";
}

void inside_window2(complex<double> &bl, complex<double> &tr) const
{
if(bl.real() <= x1 && bl.imag() <= y1 && tr.real() >= x2 &&
tr.imag() >= y2){
draw();
}

}

};

class Triangle : public Shape {
public:
const double x1;
const double y1;
const double x2;
const double y2;
const double x3;
const double y3;

Triangle(complex<double> first, complex<double> second,
complex<double> third):
Shape("Triangle"), x1(first.real()), y1(first.imag()),
x2(second.real()),
y2(second.imag()), x3(third.real()), y3(third.imag()) {}

void draw() const {
complex<double> first(x1, y1);
complex<double> second(x2, y2);
complex<double> third(x3, y3);
cout << "<Shape::" << Shape::shapename << " " << first << " "
<< second
<< " " << third << " >\n";
}

void inside_window2(complex<double> &bl, complex<double> &tr) const
{
double wx1 = bl.real();
double wy1 = bl.imag();
double wx2 = tr.real();
double wy2 = tr.imag();
if(wx1 <= x1 && wx1 <= x2 && wx1 <= x3 && wy1 <= y1 && wy1 <=
y2 && wy1 <= y3 &&
wx2 >= x1 && wx2 >= x2 && wx2 >= x3 && wy2 >= y1 && wy2 >=
y2 && wy2 >= y3){
draw();
}
}

};


template <typename Container>
void draw_all_seq_inside2(Container& c, Rectangle &w){

complex<double> first(w.x1, w.y1);
complex<double> second(w.x2, w.y2);

for_each(c.begin(), c.end(), mem_fun(&Shape::inside_window2(first,
second)));

}



int main() {
vector<Shape *> shapes;
complex<double> first(0, 0);
complex<double> secondr(1, 1);
complex<double> secondt(0, 1);
complex<double> third(1, 0);

Circle c = Circle(first, 1);
Rectangle r = Rectangle(first, secondr);
Triangle t = Triangle(first, secondt, third);
shapes.push_back(&c);
shapes.push_back(&r);
shapes.push_back(&t);

draw_all_seq_inside2(shapes, r);

return 0;


}

wrote:
> [..]
> i have written this abtract class shape and its derived class circle,
> rectangle and triangle. i have also written this method for each shape
> object called 'draw_all_seq_inside2' which takes two values. i want to
> call this method using for_each statement in another method but it
> doesnt seem to work. this is a trim version of the code. i need to do
> this using for_each statement as it is a coursework. please have a look
> and get back to me (sorry for the lengthy code but i trimmed it as much
> as possible).
> [..]

Please RTFM. std::for_each is can only call a function with one argument
and that argument should be the result of dereferencing the iterator (or
one convertible from the result of dereferencing the iterator). IOW, one
possible implementation of 'std::for_each' is this:

template<class I, class F>
F my_for_each(I i1, I i2, F f)
{
while (i1 != i2)
f(*i1++);
return f;
}

If you read this and try to understand what it does, you will see that you
need to supply a _function pointer_ or a _functor_ as the third argument
of 'for_each'. 'mem_fun' is an adapter. It takes a _no-argument_ member
or a _single-argument_ member function and makes a one-argument functor
or a two-argument functor out of it. Yours is a _two-argument_ member
function (which really has three arguments, the first is the hidden object
pointer or reference which inside becomes 'this'). If you want to use
'mem_fun' with it, you have to also use 'bind2nd' with it to pass the
second argument of your member function. That makes the example more
complex than you're ready to tackle. Study more about templates and about
'bind1st' and 'bind2nd' binders and 'mem_fun*' adapters.

If somebody writes it for you, I bet you're not really going to learn much
about those mechanisms. If you want to learn, you have to do it yourself.

There are plenty of examples of using 'bind1st' and 'bind2nd' and also of
'mem_fun' in the archives. I could write another one, but I don't really
see the point.

V

In article < .com>,
wrote:

> just wanted to say thanks again for the help in the past. i have a new
> problem which am wondering if any body can help me with.
>
> i have written this abtract class shape and its derived class circle,
> rectangle and triangle. i have also written this method for each shape
> object called 'draw_all_seq_inside2' which takes two values. i want to
> call this method using for_each statement in another method but it
> doesnt seem to work. this is a trim version of the code. i need to do
> this using for_each statement as it is a coursework. please have a look
> and get back to me (sorry for the lengthy code but i trimmed it as much
> as possible).

I trimmed your code a bit more:

class Shape {
public:
virtual void inside_window2(complex<double> &bl,
complex<double> &tr) const = 0;
};

void foo( vector<Shape*> c,
complex<double> x, complex<double> y )
{
for_each( c.begin(), c.end(), /* something that will call
inside_window2 on each shape with the arguments x and y */ );
}

The simplest way to do this sort of thing is to put the body of the loop
in a functor then create one and pass it to the for_each function...

So, the inside of the loop looks like this:

void inside_loop( const Shape* s, complex<double> x, complex<double> y )
{
s->inside_window_2( x, y );
}

but we want to provide the 'x' and 'y' at a different time than the 's'.
That requires two steps, and the 'x' and 'y' have to be stored...

struct call_inside_window2_with {
complex<double> x, y;
foo( complex<double> a, complex<double> b ): x(a), y(b) { }
void operator()( const Shape* s ) const {
s->inside_window2( x, y );
}
};

for_each( c.begin(), c.end(), call_inside_window2_with( x, y ) );

where would i put the following piece of code for the for_each to work.
i cant figure it out. please use the original file as a template of
give an example.

struct call_inside_window2_with {
complex<double> x, y;
foo( complex<double> a, complex<double> b ): x(a), y(b) { }
void operator()( const Shape* s ) const {
s->inside_window2( x, y );
}

};

wrote:
> where would i put the following piece of code for the for_each to work.
> i cant figure it out. please use the original file as a template of
> give an example.

Whose coursework is it?

wrote:
>
> where would i put the following piece of code for the for_each to work.
> i cant figure it out. please use the original file as a template of
> give an example.
>
> struct call_inside_window2_with {
> complex<double> x, y;
> foo( complex<double> a, complex<double> b ): x(a), y(b) { }
> void operator()( const Shape* s ) const {
> s->inside_window2( x, y );
> }
>
> };

look at it closely.
It is just a declaration of a structure. If you prefer, you can
replace the 'struct' with 'class' and add the 'public:' keyword
as needed. Then it would be just an ordinary class declaration,
so you may put it wherever such a thing is valid
(of course, you need to put it somewhere before it is used in the actual
for_each statement).

--
Karl Heinz Buchegger

i really appreciate your help but there is no time to do indept
research, i came to the forum because i have run out of time and i am
know desperate as i have to hand in the work on wednesday, so if you
can help me then it would be deply appreciated

wrote:
> i really appreciate your help but there is no time to do indept
> research, i came to the forum because i have run out of time and i am
> know desperate as i have to hand in the work on wednesday, so if you
> can help me then it would be deply appreciated

You came too late. If whatever has been suggested can't help you at this
point, I recommend you ask for an extension or talk to your instructor or
teacher about handing in incomplete work. The policy of this newsgroup
is not to do homework for anybody. I am sure I don't speak for everybody
here, I am just stating facts.

they complex<double> objects which the inside_window2 method accepts is
not available when the Shape objects are initialized. this is why i am
having difficulty placing it somewhere in my code. i only picked up c++
a month ago as a new module (java programmer) so i am not very
confident with it which is why i really need your help.

i have done my homework thank you. i wrote the class and the other
methods, i am asking for you help because this is a more difficult part
of the coursework, i am not asking you to do it for me, i am just
asking for something to work with. i am new to c++ (only picked it up
this term) and we havent studied anything on unaryfunction.