Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computer Certification > Microsoft Certification > 70-282 Exam Information

Reply
Thread Tools

70-282 Exam Information

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?SmltIFByZW5kZXJnYXN0?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-26-2006
Hi
Now there are lots more have tried the Exam.

Is there any information ANYWHERE on what is included in this exam.??????????

OR IS IT A SECRETE???
SECRETE

What is in the Syllabus. Simple Question





"Montreal MCSA" wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> I am sorry that you feel that way, but I am not entirely sure how you would
> have me respond to your points in two posts.
>
> If you feel that you have wasted your time by studying material that will be
> pertinent to your career if not an exam then it is too bad but I will be
> honest, I have spoken with a lot of people who have written the exam both
> before and after the changes and most of them are satisfied with the changes.
>
> Again I will repeat that Gold Certified Partners are not supposed to have
> any advantage whatsoever with the SBSC program. Frankly when I was told
> about the program I was upset because I was not to receive any advantages,
> and when it was explained to me that the big advantages were for small
> businesses rather than Gold Partners I was satisfied. Obviously you are not.
>
> I have to ask though... do you work with Small Business Server, or were you
> relying solely on studying? As with every Microsoft exam they tell you ahead
> of time that you should have real experience before writing the exam. I have
> been working with it for quite some time and was therefore comfortable in the
> exam without the course and studying. However you are right, they do expect
> the SBS answers, so adding users should not be done through ADUC.
>
> Both SQL Server and Exchange Migrations are a part of SBS, but it will often
> be the case that they put answers in that do not apply as wrong answers. If
> you overthink the answers often you will get caught.
>
> In closing I am sorry that you are considering dropping the SBS line because
> you are upset, and would welcome the opportunity to help you off-line to
> resolve your concerns. I know that Microsoft has made extreme progress in
> the past two years to make the product what it is and I honestly believe it
> is the right solution for small businesses. If you are unhappy please e-mail
> me at mitch at mitchgarvis dot com and hopefully we resolve your concerns and
> possibly change your mind about carrying the product line.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mitch Garvis
> --
> MDG, MCSA
>
>
> "Jim Prendergast" wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been checking up.
> > http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-282.asp
> > States that the course and exam are in line.
> >
> > There is nothing in the stated course about SQl and Excahnged migrations.
> > yet in the exam there were questions, Lookin the newsgroup lots are
> > complaining about this.
> >
> > The Exam has moved away from the stated objectives..
> >
> > IE Course and Exam should be on same subject.
> >
> > I have just wasted time, I could have been taking the exchange or active
> > directory exams. There stated objective are clear.
> >
> > Microsoft wrote the course, maybe they should keep them together. Otherwise
> > people will want there money back???
> >
> >
> >
> > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jim.
> > >
> > > I had not seen your initial complaint, but let me answer it here. Microsoft
> > > changed the exam because there were too many complaints that the original was
> > > too easy. I don't remember the exact number but the pass rate was in the
> > > stratosphere.
> > >
> > > Having said that they did not change the subject material. The courseware
> > > is the same and the material being tested is the same. None of that has been
> > > changed.
> > >
> > > It is not that 70-282 has nothing to do with SBS, that is not true. It is
> > > just not excusively on SBS and it never was. It is titled Planning,
> > > Deploying, and Managing a Network Solution for the Small and Medium-Sized
> > > Business. Is SBS a big part of that? Yes. Is it the only aspect of it? Not
> > > at all.
> > >
> > > As for stopping partners from needing this exam for SBS validation that is
> > > firstly to my knowledge not true. The requirements for joining the Small
> > > Business Specialist Community (SBSC) have not changed. It is also known as
> > > an equalizer for smaller companies who would not qualify for GOLD Partner
> > > status. It is the one domain where Registered Partners and God Certified
> > > Partners are treated equally.
> > >
> > > Good luck to you!
> > >
> > > Mitch
> > > --
> > > MDG, MCSA
> > >
> > >
> > > "Jim Prendergast" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I posted a complaint about the change in this Exam, it was remove3d from
> > > > the newsgroup.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why
> > > > Is microsoft unwilling to have complaints aired???
> > > >
> > > > The complaint was:
> > > > How can you change a EXAM, without first
> > > > 1/ Suppling courseware
> > > > 2/ Changing the course (which is sold to us at a cost)
> > > > 3/ Informing GOLD partners that the EXAM HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SBS.
> > > > 4/ Stopping Partners from needing this Exam for SBS valididation.
> > > >
> > > > This is a valid complaint
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > HI CSCAdmin,
> > > > >
> > > > > You can e-mail me at newsgroups at mitchgarvis dot com. You have me
> > > > > intrigued
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitch
> > > > > --
> > > > > MDG, MCSA
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "CSCADMIN" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Montreal MCSA,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to contact you offline via email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How may I proceed with emailing you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please let me know...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank You.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > HI Aman,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I took the test a few months ago and honestly it was so easy that I
> > > > > > > complained to Microsoft that they were making meaningless the letters MCP.
> > > > > > > However if I am not mistaken there were 50 questions and 170 minutes.
> > > > > > > Without studying and with a fever I finished in 65 minutes and scored an 897.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Good luck and let us know how it goes!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mitch
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > MDG, MCSA
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Aman Tech" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Friends,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Could any one please tell me how many questions, does the 70-282 Exam has?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also how many minutes long is the test.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Aman

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
=?Utf-8?B?SmltIFByZW5kZXJnYXN0?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-26-2006
Hi
Now there are lots more have tried the Exam.

Is there any information ANYWHERE on what is included in this exam.??????????

OR IS IT A SECRETE???
SECRETE

What is in the Syllabus. Simple Question





"Montreal MCSA" wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> I am sorry that you feel that way, but I am not entirely sure how you would
> have me respond to your points in two posts.
>
> If you feel that you have wasted your time by studying material that will be
> pertinent to your career if not an exam then it is too bad but I will be
> honest, I have spoken with a lot of people who have written the exam both
> before and after the changes and most of them are satisfied with the changes.
>
> Again I will repeat that Gold Certified Partners are not supposed to have
> any advantage whatsoever with the SBSC program. Frankly when I was told
> about the program I was upset because I was not to receive any advantages,
> and when it was explained to me that the big advantages were for small
> businesses rather than Gold Partners I was satisfied. Obviously you are not.
>
> I have to ask though... do you work with Small Business Server, or were you
> relying solely on studying? As with every Microsoft exam they tell you ahead
> of time that you should have real experience before writing the exam. I have
> been working with it for quite some time and was therefore comfortable in the
> exam without the course and studying. However you are right, they do expect
> the SBS answers, so adding users should not be done through ADUC.
>
> Both SQL Server and Exchange Migrations are a part of SBS, but it will often
> be the case that they put answers in that do not apply as wrong answers. If
> you overthink the answers often you will get caught.
>
> In closing I am sorry that you are considering dropping the SBS line because
> you are upset, and would welcome the opportunity to help you off-line to
> resolve your concerns. I know that Microsoft has made extreme progress in
> the past two years to make the product what it is and I honestly believe it
> is the right solution for small businesses. If you are unhappy please e-mail
> me at mitch at mitchgarvis dot com and hopefully we resolve your concerns and
> possibly change your mind about carrying the product line.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mitch Garvis
> --
> MDG, MCSA
>
>
> "Jim Prendergast" wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been checking up.
> > http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-282.asp
> > States that the course and exam are in line.
> >
> > There is nothing in the stated course about SQl and Excahnged migrations.
> > yet in the exam there were questions, Lookin the newsgroup lots are
> > complaining about this.
> >
> > The Exam has moved away from the stated objectives..
> >
> > IE Course and Exam should be on same subject.
> >
> > I have just wasted time, I could have been taking the exchange or active
> > directory exams. There stated objective are clear.
> >
> > Microsoft wrote the course, maybe they should keep them together. Otherwise
> > people will want there money back???
> >
> >
> >
> > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jim.
> > >
> > > I had not seen your initial complaint, but let me answer it here. Microsoft
> > > changed the exam because there were too many complaints that the original was
> > > too easy. I don't remember the exact number but the pass rate was in the
> > > stratosphere.
> > >
> > > Having said that they did not change the subject material. The courseware
> > > is the same and the material being tested is the same. None of that has been
> > > changed.
> > >
> > > It is not that 70-282 has nothing to do with SBS, that is not true. It is
> > > just not excusively on SBS and it never was. It is titled Planning,
> > > Deploying, and Managing a Network Solution for the Small and Medium-Sized
> > > Business. Is SBS a big part of that? Yes. Is it the only aspect of it? Not
> > > at all.
> > >
> > > As for stopping partners from needing this exam for SBS validation that is
> > > firstly to my knowledge not true. The requirements for joining the Small
> > > Business Specialist Community (SBSC) have not changed. It is also known as
> > > an equalizer for smaller companies who would not qualify for GOLD Partner
> > > status. It is the one domain where Registered Partners and God Certified
> > > Partners are treated equally.
> > >
> > > Good luck to you!
> > >
> > > Mitch
> > > --
> > > MDG, MCSA
> > >
> > >
> > > "Jim Prendergast" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I posted a complaint about the change in this Exam, it was remove3d from
> > > > the newsgroup.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why
> > > > Is microsoft unwilling to have complaints aired???
> > > >
> > > > The complaint was:
> > > > How can you change a EXAM, without first
> > > > 1/ Suppling courseware
> > > > 2/ Changing the course (which is sold to us at a cost)
> > > > 3/ Informing GOLD partners that the EXAM HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SBS.
> > > > 4/ Stopping Partners from needing this Exam for SBS valididation.
> > > >
> > > > This is a valid complaint
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > HI CSCAdmin,
> > > > >
> > > > > You can e-mail me at newsgroups at mitchgarvis dot com. You have me
> > > > > intrigued
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitch
> > > > > --
> > > > > MDG, MCSA
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "CSCADMIN" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Montreal MCSA,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to contact you offline via email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How may I proceed with emailing you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please let me know...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank You.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > HI Aman,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I took the test a few months ago and honestly it was so easy that I
> > > > > > > complained to Microsoft that they were making meaningless the letters MCP.
> > > > > > > However if I am not mistaken there were 50 questions and 170 minutes.
> > > > > > > Without studying and with a fever I finished in 65 minutes and scored an 897.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Good luck and let us know how it goes!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mitch
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > MDG, MCSA
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Aman Tech" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Friends,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Could any one please tell me how many questions, does the 70-282 Exam has?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also how many minutes long is the test.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Aman

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Arthur
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-27-2006
Please don't carry on conversations off-group.
Keep it here for the benefit of all.

"Andrew" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Mitch,
>
> If can prolly explain the concern over this change in the exam. Would it
> be
> possible for me to contact you about my concerns and the rather large
> majority of concerns of the employees I work with centered around this
> exam?
> It just Might actually help out a bit.
>
> "(E-Mail Removed)" wrote:
>
>>
>> > Not even in the title is SBS mentioned, as I've stated before this exam
>> > is
>> > applying knowledge to designing the right solution for the right
>> > candidate
>> > [business].

>>
>> Interesting, can we expect in the near future Mac or Linux questions in
>> this exam? As the title does not make this impossible, and we are
>> talking about right solutions for the right candidates.
>> I consider the new exam an undocumented change of policy certainly in
>> regard of http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-282.asp Probably
>> it mainly clarifies the Microsoft way of working, we better like it go
>> to look elsewhere.
>>
>>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Arthur
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-27-2006
Please don't carry on conversations off-group.
Keep it here for the benefit of all.

"Andrew" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Mitch,
>
> If can prolly explain the concern over this change in the exam. Would it
> be
> possible for me to contact you about my concerns and the rather large
> majority of concerns of the employees I work with centered around this
> exam?
> It just Might actually help out a bit.
>
> "(E-Mail Removed)" wrote:
>
>>
>> > Not even in the title is SBS mentioned, as I've stated before this exam
>> > is
>> > applying knowledge to designing the right solution for the right
>> > candidate
>> > [business].

>>
>> Interesting, can we expect in the near future Mac or Linux questions in
>> this exam? As the title does not make this impossible, and we are
>> talking about right solutions for the right candidates.
>> I consider the new exam an undocumented change of policy certainly in
>> regard of http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-282.asp Probably
>> it mainly clarifies the Microsoft way of working, we better like it go
>> to look elsewhere.
>>
>>



 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?SmltIFByZW5kZXJnYXN0?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-28-2006
All the webcasts, training guides, and statements about the exam.

The queastions they are now including are not align to anything they state
is in the exam.

That means anybody who passed the exam before June have a Exam at a easy pass.

A two teer exam. This should not be possible.



"Montreal MCSA" wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> I am sorry that you feel that way, but I am not entirely sure how you would
> have me respond to your points in two posts.
>
> If you feel that you have wasted your time by studying material that will be
> pertinent to your career if not an exam then it is too bad but I will be
> honest, I have spoken with a lot of people who have written the exam both
> before and after the changes and most of them are satisfied with the changes.
>
> Again I will repeat that Gold Certified Partners are not supposed to have
> any advantage whatsoever with the SBSC program. Frankly when I was told
> about the program I was upset because I was not to receive any advantages,
> and when it was explained to me that the big advantages were for small
> businesses rather than Gold Partners I was satisfied. Obviously you are not.
>
> I have to ask though... do you work with Small Business Server, or were you
> relying solely on studying? As with every Microsoft exam they tell you ahead
> of time that you should have real experience before writing the exam. I have
> been working with it for quite some time and was therefore comfortable in the
> exam without the course and studying. However you are right, they do expect
> the SBS answers, so adding users should not be done through ADUC.
>
> Both SQL Server and Exchange Migrations are a part of SBS, but it will often
> be the case that they put answers in that do not apply as wrong answers. If
> you overthink the answers often you will get caught.
>
> In closing I am sorry that you are considering dropping the SBS line because
> you are upset, and would welcome the opportunity to help you off-line to
> resolve your concerns. I know that Microsoft has made extreme progress in
> the past two years to make the product what it is and I honestly believe it
> is the right solution for small businesses. If you are unhappy please e-mail
> me at mitch at mitchgarvis dot com and hopefully we resolve your concerns and
> possibly change your mind about carrying the product line.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mitch Garvis
> --
> MDG, MCSA
>
>
> "Jim Prendergast" wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been checking up.
> > http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-282.asp
> > States that the course and exam are in line.
> >
> > There is nothing in the stated course about SQl and Excahnged migrations.
> > yet in the exam there were questions, Lookin the newsgroup lots are
> > complaining about this.
> >
> > The Exam has moved away from the stated objectives..
> >
> > IE Course and Exam should be on same subject.
> >
> > I have just wasted time, I could have been taking the exchange or active
> > directory exams. There stated objective are clear.
> >
> > Microsoft wrote the course, maybe they should keep them together. Otherwise
> > people will want there money back???
> >
> >
> >
> > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jim.
> > >
> > > I had not seen your initial complaint, but let me answer it here. Microsoft
> > > changed the exam because there were too many complaints that the original was
> > > too easy. I don't remember the exact number but the pass rate was in the
> > > stratosphere.
> > >
> > > Having said that they did not change the subject material. The courseware
> > > is the same and the material being tested is the same. None of that has been
> > > changed.
> > >
> > > It is not that 70-282 has nothing to do with SBS, that is not true. It is
> > > just not excusively on SBS and it never was. It is titled Planning,
> > > Deploying, and Managing a Network Solution for the Small and Medium-Sized
> > > Business. Is SBS a big part of that? Yes. Is it the only aspect of it? Not
> > > at all.
> > >
> > > As for stopping partners from needing this exam for SBS validation that is
> > > firstly to my knowledge not true. The requirements for joining the Small
> > > Business Specialist Community (SBSC) have not changed. It is also known as
> > > an equalizer for smaller companies who would not qualify for GOLD Partner
> > > status. It is the one domain where Registered Partners and God Certified
> > > Partners are treated equally.
> > >
> > > Good luck to you!
> > >
> > > Mitch
> > > --
> > > MDG, MCSA
> > >
> > >
> > > "Jim Prendergast" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I posted a complaint about the change in this Exam, it was remove3d from
> > > > the newsgroup.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why
> > > > Is microsoft unwilling to have complaints aired???
> > > >
> > > > The complaint was:
> > > > How can you change a EXAM, without first
> > > > 1/ Suppling courseware
> > > > 2/ Changing the course (which is sold to us at a cost)
> > > > 3/ Informing GOLD partners that the EXAM HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SBS.
> > > > 4/ Stopping Partners from needing this Exam for SBS valididation.
> > > >
> > > > This is a valid complaint
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > HI CSCAdmin,
> > > > >
> > > > > You can e-mail me at newsgroups at mitchgarvis dot com. You have me
> > > > > intrigued
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitch
> > > > > --
> > > > > MDG, MCSA
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "CSCADMIN" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Montreal MCSA,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to contact you offline via email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How may I proceed with emailing you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please let me know...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank You.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > HI Aman,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I took the test a few months ago and honestly it was so easy that I
> > > > > > > complained to Microsoft that they were making meaningless the letters MCP.
> > > > > > > However if I am not mistaken there were 50 questions and 170 minutes.
> > > > > > > Without studying and with a fever I finished in 65 minutes and scored an 897.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Good luck and let us know how it goes!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mitch
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > MDG, MCSA
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Aman Tech" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Friends,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Could any one please tell me how many questions, does the 70-282 Exam has?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also how many minutes long is the test.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Aman

 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?SmltIFByZW5kZXJnYXN0?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-28-2006
All the webcasts, training guides, and statements about the exam.

The queastions they are now including are not align to anything they state
is in the exam.

That means anybody who passed the exam before June have a Exam at a easy pass.

A two teer exam. This should not be possible.



"Montreal MCSA" wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> I am sorry that you feel that way, but I am not entirely sure how you would
> have me respond to your points in two posts.
>
> If you feel that you have wasted your time by studying material that will be
> pertinent to your career if not an exam then it is too bad but I will be
> honest, I have spoken with a lot of people who have written the exam both
> before and after the changes and most of them are satisfied with the changes.
>
> Again I will repeat that Gold Certified Partners are not supposed to have
> any advantage whatsoever with the SBSC program. Frankly when I was told
> about the program I was upset because I was not to receive any advantages,
> and when it was explained to me that the big advantages were for small
> businesses rather than Gold Partners I was satisfied. Obviously you are not.
>
> I have to ask though... do you work with Small Business Server, or were you
> relying solely on studying? As with every Microsoft exam they tell you ahead
> of time that you should have real experience before writing the exam. I have
> been working with it for quite some time and was therefore comfortable in the
> exam without the course and studying. However you are right, they do expect
> the SBS answers, so adding users should not be done through ADUC.
>
> Both SQL Server and Exchange Migrations are a part of SBS, but it will often
> be the case that they put answers in that do not apply as wrong answers. If
> you overthink the answers often you will get caught.
>
> In closing I am sorry that you are considering dropping the SBS line because
> you are upset, and would welcome the opportunity to help you off-line to
> resolve your concerns. I know that Microsoft has made extreme progress in
> the past two years to make the product what it is and I honestly believe it
> is the right solution for small businesses. If you are unhappy please e-mail
> me at mitch at mitchgarvis dot com and hopefully we resolve your concerns and
> possibly change your mind about carrying the product line.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mitch Garvis
> --
> MDG, MCSA
>
>
> "Jim Prendergast" wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been checking up.
> > http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-282.asp
> > States that the course and exam are in line.
> >
> > There is nothing in the stated course about SQl and Excahnged migrations.
> > yet in the exam there were questions, Lookin the newsgroup lots are
> > complaining about this.
> >
> > The Exam has moved away from the stated objectives..
> >
> > IE Course and Exam should be on same subject.
> >
> > I have just wasted time, I could have been taking the exchange or active
> > directory exams. There stated objective are clear.
> >
> > Microsoft wrote the course, maybe they should keep them together. Otherwise
> > people will want there money back???
> >
> >
> >
> > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jim.
> > >
> > > I had not seen your initial complaint, but let me answer it here. Microsoft
> > > changed the exam because there were too many complaints that the original was
> > > too easy. I don't remember the exact number but the pass rate was in the
> > > stratosphere.
> > >
> > > Having said that they did not change the subject material. The courseware
> > > is the same and the material being tested is the same. None of that has been
> > > changed.
> > >
> > > It is not that 70-282 has nothing to do with SBS, that is not true. It is
> > > just not excusively on SBS and it never was. It is titled Planning,
> > > Deploying, and Managing a Network Solution for the Small and Medium-Sized
> > > Business. Is SBS a big part of that? Yes. Is it the only aspect of it? Not
> > > at all.
> > >
> > > As for stopping partners from needing this exam for SBS validation that is
> > > firstly to my knowledge not true. The requirements for joining the Small
> > > Business Specialist Community (SBSC) have not changed. It is also known as
> > > an equalizer for smaller companies who would not qualify for GOLD Partner
> > > status. It is the one domain where Registered Partners and God Certified
> > > Partners are treated equally.
> > >
> > > Good luck to you!
> > >
> > > Mitch
> > > --
> > > MDG, MCSA
> > >
> > >
> > > "Jim Prendergast" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I posted a complaint about the change in this Exam, it was remove3d from
> > > > the newsgroup.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why
> > > > Is microsoft unwilling to have complaints aired???
> > > >
> > > > The complaint was:
> > > > How can you change a EXAM, without first
> > > > 1/ Suppling courseware
> > > > 2/ Changing the course (which is sold to us at a cost)
> > > > 3/ Informing GOLD partners that the EXAM HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SBS.
> > > > 4/ Stopping Partners from needing this Exam for SBS valididation.
> > > >
> > > > This is a valid complaint
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > HI CSCAdmin,
> > > > >
> > > > > You can e-mail me at newsgroups at mitchgarvis dot com. You have me
> > > > > intrigued
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitch
> > > > > --
> > > > > MDG, MCSA
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "CSCADMIN" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Montreal MCSA,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to contact you offline via email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How may I proceed with emailing you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please let me know...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank You.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Montreal MCSA" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > HI Aman,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I took the test a few months ago and honestly it was so easy that I
> > > > > > > complained to Microsoft that they were making meaningless the letters MCP.
> > > > > > > However if I am not mistaken there were 50 questions and 170 minutes.
> > > > > > > Without studying and with a fever I finished in 65 minutes and scored an 897.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Good luck and let us know how it goes!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mitch
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > MDG, MCSA
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Aman Tech" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Friends,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Could any one please tell me how many questions, does the 70-282 Exam has?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also how many minutes long is the test.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Aman

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
microsoft.public.certification, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsa, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd loyola MCSE 4 11-15-2006 02:40 AM
microsoft.public.certification, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsa, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd loyola Microsoft Certification 3 11-14-2006 05:18 PM
microsoft.public.certification, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsa, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd loyola MCSD 3 11-14-2006 05:18 PM
microsoft.public.certification, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsa, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd loyola MCAD 3 11-14-2006 05:18 PM
microsoft.public.certification, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsa, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd realexxams@yahoo.com Microsoft Certification 0 05-10-2006 02:35 PM



Advertisments