George W. Bush Planned 9/11 PHOTO PROOF Bush killed over 3000 WTC 911 victims World Trade Center September 11th

Bush Planned 911 September 11th! Look at the photos before you say it
was a plane!!! The Professional Photographers that took the photos of
the pentagon analyzed the photos and agree that the hole is too small
for a jetliner. Unless you are a Phtographer you should not be
responding since you don't have the experience to make an educated
comment.

>it's already happened.
>http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/el-al.htm

Looks like a 747-sized hole to us! Also two of the four engines had
even fallen off pre-crash! This is exactly the sort of massive damage
you would expect from a huge jetliner but look at the tiny hole that
is the only wound to the pentagon:

Tiny hole in pentagon not large enough for intercontinental passenger
airplane Figure1: http://img16.exs.cx/img16/4381/Sept11th.jpg

>We know you're a Republican provocateur, and you're BORING.

You sound foolish when you say Republicans would accuse Bush of
Planning 911. Provocateurs are anything but Boring, the fact that the
president is a murderer is the most important story of the millenium
and everyone would agree that it is important to determine if this
case has valid merits. We are an organization so please do not tell us
we all need to take Medication.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...g .google.com

The real truth is he killed over 3000+ 9/11 World Trade Center
disaster victims! Read the link above for the undisputable photo
evidence.
The fact is he and his cronies could have, had the most to gain from,
and DID plan it, and here is the incontovertible photo and video
proof:

White Bomb right side fuselage - Figure2:
http://img7.exs.cx/img7/9837/wtc.jpg
Source Cable Video Feeds:
Part1: http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/08-m...Plane_Site.zip
Part2: http://66.90.75.92/suprnova//torrent...E_SVCD.torrent

Govt. lied when they said the flight school rookie amateur pilot
terrorists carried out the complicated flight manuevers in the attack
when it is clear a 767 did not crash into the pentagon and planes
cannot attain G-forces like those the five tapes show under manual
control, only remotely because the onboard flight computer DISABLES
the pilot's steering since a person would pass out without a flight
suit.
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country
and our people, and neither do we."

Are you being paid by bush directly or indirectly? That is the only
reason you would say such a traitorous statment when you find out your
fellow countrymen have been massacred by their so-called leader! What
is your problem with the pictures, they show the fact that NO JETLINER
crashed into the pentagon. We don't have to make up anything because
the TRUTH is on the pictures and they don't lie! Why can't you state
how a huge plane could make that tiny hole the pictures show? The
pictures are crisp and crystal clear and they speak for themselves.

"Our enemies [...] never stop thinking about new ways to harm our
country [...] and neither do we."
-George W. Bush

Tiny hole in pentagon not large enough for intercontinental passenger
airplane Figure1: http://img16.exs.cx/img16/4381/Sept11th.jpg
White Bomb right side fuselage - Figure2:
http://img7.exs.cx/img7/9837/wtc.jpg
Source Cable Video Feeds:
Part1: http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/08-m...Plane_Site.zip
Part2: http://66.90.75.92/suprnova//torrent...E_SVCD.torrent

WE HAVE ALREADY STATED YOU SHOULD CEASE AND DECIST from making idiotic
irrelevant reply posts but you losers still don't get it, don't post
what is on your mind, ket others view the evidence for themselves
wiothout your confused views perverting their ability to think for
themselves UNLESS YOU STATE YOUR EXPERT DEGREE! Unless you have one
you are not qualified to reply! Let's leave this up to the experts,
those who have been notified have determined Bush actauylly did plan
the September 11th Terrorism.

Bush Whacker

(Bush Whacker) wrote in
news: om:

> Bush Planned 911 September 11th!
At most he recognized the possibility of a second, more determined
attack after the truck bomb in the basement of one of the towers
failed to bring it down, as did many others.

> Look at the photos before you say it was a plane!!!
I have, more than once. Newsflash: It was a plane!!!

> The Professional Photographers that took the photos of
> the pentagon analyzed the photos and agree that the hole
> is too small for a jetliner.
At least the ones who looked at your picture of a window
several yards away from the actual impact area.

an undoctored photo is on this site:
http://www.dcfd.com/fg11.htm
The camera is even aimed at the actual impact point, as
opposed to the purported evidence, which consists mainly
of cropped photos of the edges of the impact area and
one obviously altered collage.

> Unless you are a Phtographer you should not be responding
> since you don't have the experience to make an educated
> comment.
Guess what? I've got pictures of flies mating and sticking out
their tongues that I took myself. I would not claim to be an
'expert', since my photographic work is strictly digital,
and because the media has overused the word 'expert' to the
point of rendering it meaningless. However I am a respected
amateur photo analyst with a degree in computer science.

Applying a transform to perspective correct the layer copied
from the bottom frame of the composite photo on the site:
http://img16.exs.cx/img16/4381/Sept11th.jpg
into the small inset image inevitably left edge artifacts,
most noticeable along the roofline, but especially apparent
in the fact that the sun would have to be simultaneously
shining from two different directions. Do you hacks
ever get the lighting right? Not that I've seen.

The person who placed the layer put a good effort into
lining up the column on the right and paid attention to
the windows on the left, but had to resort to cropping
the inset image along the roofline and cluttering the
image to hide the imperfections along the top and
bottom edges of the pasted image of the 'hole'.

Your so-called hole is actually the roughly circular
white patch in the lower half of the composite photo.
The two images of the pentagon walls are from either
side of the actual impact site.

> > you're BORING.
I wonder how boring he'll be if I get the assistant
DA to back up my assertions? This twerp could easily
make a stink that will follow him out into the real
world the way he's going. I'm sure he can find plenty
of underclassmen to oooh and aaah and fuel his ego.
Too bad he decided to try showing off his masterpiece
in a more public forum where the survivors could have
a look.

> You sound foolish when you say Republicans would
> accuse Bush of Planning 911.
Sounds like your conscience is trying to tell you
something. Something on the order of:
"Get off the lying"

> Provocateurs are anything but Boring,
Prosecutors find them especially interesting.
Are you so starved for attention that you
really want to meet one in person?

> the fact that the president is a murderer
You could be sued for slander for that. Or was it libel?
In a legal sense that statement is only true if he has
been convicted, which he has not. But perhaps I should
ask someone who would know for sure, such as the asst. DA.

When confronted with your conspiracy theory, the president
mumbled "That's just politics" as he struggled to control
his urge to cry, or vomit. Only he knows for sure.

He repeated himself just to shake off the shock of your
accusation. Sure, he could sue you, but he'd look
vindictive doing it. I, on the other hand, have nothing
much at stake in any inquiries I may make of the legal
profession. You tread a dangerous path, and I doubt you
are aware of it. That's not a threat, it's a warning.

> is the most important story of the millenium
Hardly. Perhaps the most self-aggrandizing.

> and everyone would agree that it is important
> to determine if this case has valid merits.
Well, that didn't take long, did it? It has none.

This might not be the last time your ego gets the best
of you, and this incident just might cross your mind in
the course of some future soul-searching. The amateur
psychologist in me is wondering if you are doing this
because you are suffering 'survivors guilt', I have
the impression most of the casualties in Iraq are
closer to your age than to mine. I won't ask you
to reveal something like that publicly, that would
be entirely up to you. Just something to think
about, maybe you could find a more effective way
to express your feelings?

The war in Iraq is what it took to finally convince
Saddam to say what was really on his mind all those
years when he kept changing his story.

http://asia.news.yahoo.com/041006/ap/d85i8c002.html

He's in jail, and lucky to be alive.

> We are an organization so please do not tell us we
> all need to take Medication.
We? Managed to convince a couple of people close to
you, and badger some others into paying lip service
just to get you off their neck? Most people don't
know just why your picture doesn't look right, so
it's easier for the people who have to put up with
you in person to act like they believe you and try
to change the subject.

> The fact is he and his cronies could have,
but didn't

> had the most to gain from,
Quite the opposite. Events such as those of 9/11/01
give politicians the hershey squirts, because they
disgruntle the general population. As for me, I
get to put up with you. I think if you live long
enough to get a sense of history you might be okay.
In the meantime I think I'll try to avoid you if at
all possible.

> and DID plan it,
You haven't got so much as an illegible dinner napkin to
back that statement up with. Quick, go forge one!

> Are you being paid by bush directly or indirectly?
Not unless he succumbs to a wave of gratitude and writes an
executive order to compensate me for the time I've spent on
your nonsense.

> We don't have to make up anything because
Someone else had the editing software and images and put them
together for you?

> the TRUTH is on the pictures and they don't lie!
You're right about that much, that's just how I figured out you
were lying.

> Why can't you state how a huge plane could make that tiny hole
> the pictures show?
I can and have. The 'hole' was made by someone with editing
software and a few minutes to kill chasing a vainglorious
dream. One person's dream is several thousand other's worst
nightmare in this case.

> The pictures are crisp and crystal clear
Not the collage, and the inset was tiny enough to keep me busy
for a while.

> and they speak for themselves.
and they are saying your nose is getting longer, pinochio.

> "Our enemies [...] never stop thinking about new ways to harm our
> country [...] and neither do we."
> -George W. Bush
Apparently his self-deprecating sense of humor is lost on you.
You wouldn't have a link for the complete transcript of that
speech, would you? Maybe then we could see this quote in
context!

> Tiny hole in pentagon not large enough for intercontinental passenger
> airplane Figure1: http://img16.exs.cx/img16/4381/Sept11th.jpg
debunked. Several times over, but you seem to have too much of
your ego invested to walk away.

> White Bomb right side fuselage - Figure2:
> http://img7.exs.cx/img7/9837/wtc.jpg
Hey, maybe you'll get lucky and someone will mistake the sunlit
horizontal stabilizer on the right side of the plane for the
vertical stabilizer. If they do, then the plane will look
wrong to them somehow and they just might believe you.

> Source Cable Video Feeds:
> Part1:
> http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/08-m...-government/20
> 04/911_In_Plane_Site.zip Part2:
> http://66.90.75.92/suprnova//torrent...%20SITE_SVCD.t
> orrent
I'll let someone else have a piece of you here, why should I have all
the fun?

> WE HAVE ALREADY STATED YOU SHOULD CEASE AND DECIST from making idiotic
> irrelevant reply posts but you losers still don't get it,
Talking to yourself? Or is General Subconscious begging
president Forebrain for an exit strategy from the quagmire
of your prevarications? Maybe it's just something you got
in an email and pasted it into your message because it
just sounded so *powerful*.

> don't post what is on your mind,
I tend to get an itchy trigger finger around people who would
stifle my first amendment rights, let alone tell me what to
think. That's why I don't own a gun, too much chance of
putting a permanent solution to a temporary problem.
Yet somehow I have the feeling a simple 'no' would never
suffice when dealing with the likes of you, and I find
typing is a very satisfying way to scratch that itch.

> let others view the evidence for themselves
Oh, and what am I going to do? Throw myself in front of their
browser? Har! Of course you'd love it if the only people who
were allowed to express themselves were the ones who are gullible
enough to agree with you.

> wiothout your confused views perverting their ability to think for
> themselves UNLESS YOU STATE YOUR EXPERT DEGREE!
See above, SHOULD I SHOUT AS WELL?

> Unless you have one you are not qualified to reply!
Good thing you put an exclamation point at the end of that
sentence, someone without a degree might tell you to go
watch tv and stop dancing on people's graves.

> Let's leave this up to the experts,
Like anyone with a graduate degree has time for your variously
morbid and mordant head games! But you were counting on that,
weren't you?

> those who have been notified have determined Bush
is a lot nicer than you are.

> actauylly
If you'd been speaking instead of writing when you said that,
you'd have a huge gob of foamy spit running down your chin.
But that's just a guess, since I only took general physics,
too busy with the second semester of calculus. Before you
accuse me of flunking the first semester, that was advanced
calculus, 3d graphs instead of 2d, and polar coordinates
instead of, or as well as cartesian. But I have a feeling
you'll just tell me how much more important people are
than mathematics, and I would cheerfully agree with you.
But consider the fact that a disciplined mind has it's
place, please.

> did plan the September 11th Terrorism.
you left out a 'for' between 'plan' and 'the' in that last
part. But because prevention is exponentially more complex
than reaction planning and easily labeled 'paranoid'...
well, the rest is history. My apologies to the families
of those who made the supreme sacrifice if I sound cold
hearted in any way.

Clyde Frog

(Bush Whacker) wrote in message news:<. com>...
> Bush Planned 911 September 11th! Look at the photos before you say it
> was a plane!!! The Professional Photographers that took the photos of
> the pentagon analyzed the photos and agree that the hole is too small
> for a jetliner. Unless you are a Phtographer you should not be
> responding since you don't have the experience to make an educated
> comment.
>
> >it's already happened.
> >http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/el-al.htm
>
> Looks like a 747-sized hole to us! Also two of the four engines had
> even fallen off pre-crash! This is exactly the sort of massive damage
> you would expect from a huge jetliner but look at the tiny hole that
> is the only wound to the pentagon:
>
> Tiny hole in pentagon not large enough for intercontinental passenger
> airplane Figure1: http://img16.exs.cx/img16/4381/Sept11th.jpg

[snip much ranting]

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

Dave Kathman

Dave Kathman

Dave Kathman wrote:

> (Bush Whacker) wrote in message news:<. com>...
>
>>Bush Planned 911 September 11th! Look at the photos before you say it
>>was a plane!!! The Professional Photographers that took the photos of
>>the pentagon analyzed the photos and agree that the hole is too small
>>for a jetliner. Unless you are a Phtographer you should not be
>>responding since you don't have the experience to make an educated
>>comment.
>>
>>
>>>it's already happened.
>>>http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/el-al.htm
>>
>>Looks like a 747-sized hole to us! Also two of the four engines had
>>even fallen off pre-crash! This is exactly the sort of massive damage
>>you would expect from a huge jetliner but look at the tiny hole that
>>is the only wound to the pentagon:
>>
>>Tiny hole in pentagon not large enough for intercontinental passenger
>>airplane Figure1: http://img16.exs.cx/img16/4381/Sept11th.jpg
>
>
> [snip much ranting]
>
> http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
>
> Dave Kathman
>
The real mark of falsehood in all this is that Bush couldn't plan
anything more complex than a fraternity beer bust. I live in Texas,
have known about him longer than most.
Allen

Allen

It is all controlled from a central point in the UN since they all
have the same agenda. Gonna have to protect yourselves by voting Bush
and Kerry out of office at least. The only way to fight against lies
is to spread the truth. If we don't stop them now we will eventually
all be Murder victims like those in 9/11. They obviously have no
respect for human life. They planned this because Iraq has resources
they are running out of, what happens when they have determine YOU
have resources they are running out of?

I DARE anyone to cite a source that disproves anything I have stated.
If youi can't give a link, then don't waste our time! Don't just
respond that you provided proof that we were wrong when you haven't
that is a blatant lie! Look at the CNN, MSNBC, and FOX NEWS video
contained in "911 In Plane Site" and you will see that there is no way
a plane could fit in that tiny hole shown clearly from multiple
angles, There is just no argument on the matter that there is a
16-foot hole in the pentagon, are you gpint to say that a 65-foot wide
fuselage made that hole and without a shred of wreckage? You must be
mentally handicapped!

HERE IS AN UNMODIFIED UNCROPPED PICTURE OF THE IMPACT ZONE FROM TWO
DIFFERENT ANGLES! Do not LIE and say it doesn't show the impact zone,
do you think noone is going to look for themselves. It is a video
capture from the CNN news channel that clearly shows that the still
contains the only impact zone. You are so confused it is sad, it is in
your best interest not to reply since you look like either a liar or
an airhead!

THE PHOTO IS UNALTERED EXPECT FOR THE CAPTION! YOU CAN SEE Both
Windows on either side showing it was not cropped! The Evidence
CONSISTS OF CABLE NEWS VIDEO FOOTAGE, STOP LYING! AMATEUR
PHOTOGRAPHERS HAVE NO BUSINESS COMMENTEING ON THINGS THEY HAVE NO
DEGREES IN. Stop living in your virtual Cyberworld where you can deny
the obvious image from daylight video.

YOU CAN'T GET YOUR STORY STRAIGHT. First you say it doesn't show what
we say, now you say it does but has been tampered with? GET REAL the
video that the still frame was taken from is posted, watch it before
any further comment and we are sure that will shut you up and convince
you! We are talking about the ACTUAL PHOTO not the inset!

>The two images of the pentagon walls are from either side of the
actual impact site

EVERYONE can see the impact site in both pictures, it is the only
black hole in the pentagon wall! The survivors that have taken a look,
all agreed that Bush Planned 911, it is only yourself that is blind to
the truth, clinging to your precious lying government. The Assistant
DA is working for Bush as well if he can't see the truth in our VIDEO
evidence. We are much older with more experience than you have
obviously, we take things at face value when the facts stare at you in
the face, not clinging to Daddy Bush! This is not about our EGO,
though I suspect your EGO is what makes you insanely rant so inanely.

Do you really think we would be scared of a prosecutor when we have
all the evidencer in the world to back us up? We think NOT!

GEORGE W. BUSH IS A MASS MURDERER

Now he can't sue us because we have VIDEO proof he is! I say bring on
the slander suits, but there is none because he wouldn't dare when
most people (execpt yourself) already know this, only you live in this
bubble!

LEGALLY THREATEN ME YOU POMPOUS GOVT. ASS! You only look like someone
trying to coverup the truth! When the people of America see your post
they will hunt you down for treason, you traitor to the 3000+ WTC
victims!

DO you think that when this case is revealed to the public it won't be
a major story? Everyone will agree you are wrong! YOU CAN See its
merits in the video, you haven't watched the video, we can tell,
because you wouldn't be spouting such bullshit, we expect an apology
as soon as you do watch the video.

THIS IS NOT ALL OF OUR EGOS SPEAKING, IT IS THE TRUTH TALKING, PERK
YOUR EARS AND LISTEN DEAF-BOY! OPEN YOUR EYES AND WATCH THE CNN
COVERAGE. YOU SHOULD FEEL GUILTY FOR TRYING TO COVERUP AN IMPORTANT
STORY!

This is not just our feeling, it is our mind dtermining that noone but
a govt. goon could watch the video and not see what it clearly shows
which are bombs!

Tiny hole in pentagon not large enough for intercontinental passenger
airplane Figure1: http://img16.exs.cx/img16/4381/Sept11th.jpg

YOUR COVERUP PICTURE was posted earlier and has the POST-COLLAPSE
pentagon so you can no longer see the original impact zone!

You are just making this up off the top of your head while we have
documented evidence in video AND PHOTO form, Bush Planned 911, the
fact is he has never said anything like:

>he recognized the possibility of a second, more determined
>attack after the truck bomb in the basement of one of the towers
>failed to bring it down"

How are you going to argue with a picture, let everyone decide for
themselves, they have eyes and don't need you telling them what you
see when you have agreed you are not an expert and clearly need a new
eye prescription!

How come there has never been a collapse from fire in a steel
structure, can't you see that if he planned it he would be lying
through his teeth?

Look at the right hand side and see the white object attached to the
right side of the fuselage! You can see it on both planes in the five
videos, as well as the tiny hole in the pentagon in the videos.

Part1: http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/08-m...Plane_Site.zip
Part2: http://66.90.75.92/suprnova//torrent...E_SVCD.torrent

Don't you understand it wasn't the same plane, the cargo plane used
had no passenger windows and we think someone at the airport would
have noticed the giant bomb!

Kerry and Bush are both related by blood! Everyone knows they went to
the same college at the same time and were in the Secret Fraternity
"Skull & Bones"

If you haven't heard of it, then I guess it must be too secret for
you. Research before you post disagreeing replies because you are just
showing your ignorance.

You think someone with the power to pull this off, doesn't have the
power to cover it up? They wouldn't have done it if they didn't
already know they could prevent this from getting to leading news
reports. The news story is available in the "911 In Plane Site" video
that is linked free.

Part1: http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/08-m...Plane_Site.zip

Unless you are a structural engineer then you don't have any idea what
brought the towers down, you are just listening to the coverup
propaganda.

Bush HAD THE DETONATION CODES, he was the only one who had access to
the bunker buster missile which was used and is manufactured in the
USA. Look at the video where the Tower collapses, you see a sudden
explosion of flame, where did that come from if not an explosive? The
smoke had turned darker before the collapse meaning the fire had gone
out, similar to what happens when you muffle the flame to make a smoke
signal. In 95 minutes all the fuel would have burnt out long ago, and
why did one take 47.5 minutes if it was from the same cause? Simple,
the 95minutes time interval was exactly twice the other time interval
as if they were rigged to go off!

There may be smoke coming out of the hole in the pentagon, but you can
see the two windows with glass panes intact on either side of the
16-foot hole and thus that only two windows are missing! See the video
for tons more footage of this. It is not in question we have the CNN
TV News feeds!

If you hate this truth then you must be working for G.W. Bush! Don't
think Iraq was worth 3000+ innocent victims being slaughtered by
George W. BUSH!

>Most people don't know just why (I say) your picture doesn't look
right

Because noone can see where you are coming from! IT is plain-as-day!

Have you done anything in your life that was important or do you
always foloow the bandwagon, Conformist?

911 allowed Bush to attack Afghanistan and Iraq so that Halliburton,
etc. could build the oil pipeline, don't you read the news? Bush's
approval ratings went through the roof after 911 so don't tell us it
didn't help him!

>You haven't got so much as an illegible dinner napkin to back that
statement up

HAVE YOU SEEN THE VIDEO DOCUMENTATION, that is hardly a napkin!
NOTHING HAS BEEN FORGED and you know it! HOW WOULD WE FORGE CNN NEWS
COVERAGE? EVERYONE HAS THE SAME TAPE WE DO!

>compensate me for the time I've spent

YOU have wasted everyone's time and tried to muddle the truth, well we
won't let you succeed. You hate your fellow countrymen and are willing
to let them die unavenged while your precious Murderous leader you
kiss his ass! What a lackey!

There is nothing created, the screenshots were taken off the same TV
you watched on 9/11! PROVE THAT THEY WERE EDITIED YOU GOON and I will
show you the VIDEO SOURCE so you will SEE YOU ARE WRONG! THE VIDEO IS
CRSIP AND CRYSTAL CLEAR!

> "Our enemies [...] never stop thinking about new ways to harm our
> country [...] and neither do we."
> -George W. Bush
>his self-deprecating sense of humor is lost on you.

Self-Deprecating Humor? Poor Taste to say he wants to harm America
after 9/11, there is no context that excuses this!

DEBUNK THIS DUMBASS: (This is where we got the video frame Capture
ScreenShots.
Part1: http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/08-m...Plane_Site.zip

>I'll let someone else have a piece of you here, why should I have all
the fun?
Stop referring to how you want to say something clever but you won't
because everyone knows you would if you could but you can't!

We are asking you to state what you KNOW, not what you THINK, we have
backed up our statements with video and you should do the same! YOU
WON'T BECAUSE YOU CAN'T! NObody wants you scratching your stupid itch
on this important thread. Think your misguided thought but stop trying
to prevent people from making their own judegement based on the VIDEO
EVIDENCE.

WE JUST WANT YOU TO STOP MAKING STATEMENTS THAT YOU DON'T SUPPORT WITH
Links to Documentation, you have agreed you are no expert and thus you
should not burden us with your very unprofessional opinion. Would they
call you in to study a plane crash, no because you don't know anything
about buildings or planes so noone is calling you in for your
statement of opinion.

GEORGE BUSH IS DANCING ON THE 9/11 VICTIMS GRAVES BY GETTING AWAY WITH
MURDER!

The graduate-degree experts have already spoken in agreement with what
we have said.

>go watch tv

Why don't you so you can "LEARN" some more LIES controlled from the
White House? This is NO HEAD GAME, this IS REALITY, ACCEPT IT.

Do NOT REPOND SINCE YOU ARE AN IGNORANT TEENAGE COLLEGE STUDENT! YOUR
DISCIPLINE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS. CALCULUS EXPERTS HAVE NO PLACE
ANALYZING CNN NEWS Video FEEDS!

THE BOMB Is under the wing, tell us, since the experts have failed to,
how that is a stock white bomb component? (We forgot you know nothing
about aircraft so shut the hell up!)

THERE WAS NO PREVENTION THAT IS WHY IT HAPPENED YOU NUTCASE! Even the
mass media agress all preventative measures were bypassed and the
photo of the missile damage proves why.

>My apologies to the families of those who made the supreme sacrifice
if I sound cold hearted in any way

APOLOGY NOT ACCEPTED. THEY ARE GOING TO HUNT YOU DOWN AND KILL YOU FOR
TRYING TO STOP the killer of their family members from being brought
to justice.

Why do you think Osama hasn't been caught yet, he was getting dialysis
in a US Military hospital WAY AFTER 9/11. Just accept that we know
nore than you on this subject, because as you will readily admit you
get your commentary from Govt. sources! The very source that planned
the tragedy to get public support (See the plan for Govt. Terrorism in
the USA Northwoods Document).

Bush Whacker

"Bush Whacker" <> wrote in message
news: om...
> PHOTO PROOF Bush Planned 911 September 11th World Trade Center
> Conspiracy Evidence 9/11 Bush killed over 3000 WTC victims
>

> What part of Photographic PROOF Evidence don't you understand,
>

There's quite a bit that I do understand, even though I'm not a photography
expert.

Taking a magnifying-glass to the darkest part of your full-sized picture, I
can see a portion of a building with its front blasted out over several
floors (the innards of some of the rooms are just about visible). However,
moving further to the right, we find that there is more obscuring
of the building than is justified by the amount of smoke present. There is
clear evidence of the image having been overlaid by twinkling rectangles of
the kind used in television to obscure faces or car registration numbers,
and the like. I'm sure the smoke didn't produce those. I'm also wondering
why the dark and light parts of the building join with such an abrupt
straight line. Am I supposed to believe that something is casting a giant
shadow at that point? What could it be?

I also notice that the architecture of the building in your inset image does
not match that of the building in the main image, and it's obscured in the
critical area by a not-very-transparent blue rectangle, even though the rest
of the building is perfectly visible.

Unless you happened to have been present at the time, you did not take this
photo yourself. You must have got it from someone else. Maybe you could post
the source so we can compare the photo on your site with the original.

Buffalo

Buffalo

We are quite amused by your most wonderful rantings! Please do keep it up,
eh?

-your "friend", again

(P.S., the CAPITAL LETTERS you use everywhere are what *really* make
everyone believe you. Honest!)

(P.P.S., oh, I forgot to mention that this is *somewhat* off-topic in this
newsgroup. Perhaps you were looking for a Micro$oft newsgroup?)

Howard

OT
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

Alf P. Steinbach

THESE ARE NOT SOUNDBITES THEY ARE VIDEOS FROM CNN THAT PROVE BUSH
PLANNED 911!

Kerry Knows So He is Guilty by association!

PhotoShop is for Images, not the FREE DOWNLOAD OF THE CNN LIVE NEWS
COVERAGE CABLE TV NEWS CHANNEL FEEDS that everyone recorded on 9/11
and these screenshots were taken from that are evidence that Bush
Planned 911!

http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/08-m...Plane_Site.zip

The hole in building of the pentagon was not doctored or cropped in
any way. http://img16.exs.cx/img16/4381/Sept11th.jpg Look at the same
firetruck's firehose water-stream filling the same tiny hole in both
images from separate angles. Use your own eyes to see that the ZIP
video shows the rest of the angles. They prove it is the only hole in
the pentagon.

Overlays were only used for the caption and inset. The inset is a
composite from screenshots from the video all that show only a tiny
hole in the pentagon as compared to the size of a 767 fuselage.

We are talking about Bush planning 911 in this country, are you saying
it is not possible? BUSH PLANNED 911 is PROVEN IN THE VIDEO.

The real truth is manipulated to the perpetrators advantage by
selective news reporting like 9/11 post collapse photos that no longer
show the missile-hole.

UNLIKE THAT THESE VIDEOS ARE WHAT HAPPENED; NOT A SPECIAL SET-UP FOR A
STILL!

This is NOT Fahrenheit 9/11, IT actually shows the bombholes!

WE ARE NOT LYING LIKE BUSH. We are NOT SELLING ANYTHING. WE HAVE FOUND
THE TRUTH! WE DON'T WANT FAME OR FORTUNE ONLY JUSTICE!

GO Ahead and post this as many times as you can on every website you
can until he has to answer for his 911 crimes.
POST IT Until everyone knows the truth that BUSH Planned 911!

MAKE A "BUSH PLANNED 911" Bumper Sticker or Button to get the Word
OUT!

Bush Whacker

Bush Whacker wrote:
>
[snip]

You were funny when you first posted this.
But now please stop posting that nonsense to comp.lang.c++

Thank you.

--
Karl Heinz Buchegger

Karl Heinz Buchegger