George W. Bush Planned 9/11 PHOTO PROOF Bush killed over 3000 WTC 911 victims World Trade Center September 11th

Bush Planned September 11th!

Click on the following links to view the evidence:

news: om

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...g .google.com

These photos that prove bush planned 911 are not fakes.

It is The 9/11 Truth Now Exposed, get on the bandwagon and don't be
left out of the new common knowledge.

This is a major news story that needs to be posted so that the most
people can see it as possible since it has been censored from mass
media outlets.

We are neither Republican nor Democrat, we are not working for
political parties or interested in financial gain, we are only
interested in the truth, unlike anyone who disputes the evidence since
they obviously have a vested interest.

This is bipartisan, how is that photographic evidence nonsense, you
are Bush's lapdog! Bush's accomplice in the WTC mass murder! Are you a
Nazi "just following orders"?

> Fortunately for you, no one of any consequence will ever believe you.
> Otherwise I suppose we'd just have to kill you, too, eh? Then again, maybe
> we can use the practice anyway...
>
> -a "friend" in gov't

How are you going to kill everyone that knows about this now? I think
you guys have had plenty of practice. We aren't trapped in a
skyscraper like your other victims. You and Bush seem to consider the
firefighters that valiantly gave their lives to be like shooting fish
in a barrel but we all won't be so easy.

Bush Whacker

Geez! Paranoid conspiracy theories at
<URL:news:humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare>! Who'da thunk it?

But you'll still never get me to believe that a spoiled upper-class rich
kid who went bankrupt and deserted in wartime wrote the plays of
Shakespeare.

--
John W. Kennedy
"The pathetic hope that the White House will turn a Caligula into a
Marcus Aurelius is as naïve as the fear that ultimate power inevitably
corrupts."
-- James D. Barber (1930-2004).

John W. Kennedy

(Bush Whacker) wrote in
news: om:

> This is bipartisan, how is that photographic evidence nonsense, you
> are Bush's lapdog! Bush's accomplice in the WTC mass murder! Are you a
> Nazi "just following orders"?
Your grammer sounds arabic.
I don't blame you for being crazy, half the population of my country
is crazy, and the other half is too busy trying to figure out if the
person next to them is crazy to worry about anyone they don't know
personally. I can tell you are crazy because you told him he was
two different things before you asked him what he was. But at least
your thinking is moving in the right direction.

>> Fortunately for you, no one of any consequence will ever believe you.
>> Otherwise I suppose we'd just have to kill you, too, eh? Then again,
>> maybe we can use the practice anyway...
>>
>> -a "friend" in gov't

Your grammer sounds Canadian. Be that as it may, no one of consequence
in any government of consequence uses such inflammatory language.
Are you altogether unfamiliar with the term:
'Politically Correct'?
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Put your gun away, I grow weary of watching the same unfruitful
tactics so oft repeated. Your thinking is moving in the wrong
direction and makes me think you are crazy. I can tell because
you are offering to kill the messenger.

Clyde Frog

"John W. Kennedy" <> wrote in newsRU8d.7538
$:

> Geez! Paranoid conspiracy theories at
> <URL:news:humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare>! Who'da thunk it?
There's something rotten in Denmark.

> But you'll still never get me to believe that a spoiled upper-class rich
> kid who went bankrupt and deserted in wartime wrote the plays of
> Shakespeare.
Too caught up in the iambic pentameter to notice what a smart ass
he was capable of being?

Agitprop is nothing new, but it certainly is in full flood
these days.

That's agitation and propoganda, for the uninitiated.

Clyde Frog

Paranoid means it is not backed up by photographic evidence BUT this
is backed up by PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE!

Boeing Aircraft Experts ARE INTERPRETING THESE PHOTOGRAPHS. It is not
an interpretation worth talking about unless it is from a professional
that is knowledgeable in the interpretation of this photo evidence.
They have all agreed and looking at the source video should show
anyone that nothing has been edited to be misleading. Anyone who
states their opinion that it is crazy That Bush Planned 911 without
providing evidence that proves the contrary, that he could not have,
is an obvious "Ringer" receiving money from the Bush Administration
either directly or indirectly and is attempting a last ditch effort to
Keep Bush from Impeachment and THE ELECTRIC CHAIR! Anyone who
disagress with this should be shot in the street for treason! Bush's
lapdog accomplices in the WTC mass murder were just like the Nazis
that "just followed orders" and anyone who joins their side on this
debate isn't looking at the facts and/or is trying to dissuade the
public from the truth just like they did on September 11th and should
be treated as guilty like G.W. Bush! John Kerry is guilty too since he
has not come forward against his opponent Bush about Bush's complicity
in 911 in the debates, when he has seen this very same documentation,
it has been sent to him.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...g .google.com

IT IS THE TRUTH AND FACT THAT WITH THE VIDEO AND PHOTO EVIDENCE WE CAN
SAY BUSH PLANNED 911

WE ARE A GROUP OF JOURNALISTS DEDICATED TO EXPOSING THE TRUTH ABOUT
HOW BUSH PLANNED 911 AND WE HAVE PROOF!

WE HOLD NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ETHNIC OR NATIONAL/REGIONAL LOBBY THAT
HAS SKEWED OUR COVERAGE OF THIS STORY OF THE MILLENNIUM!

If you don't know about it as so many people already do, that is fine
that you are behind the times, but catch up quick or get left in the
dust of another government bombed skyscraper! If you haven't
downloaded the movie do not respond until you do:

Tiny hole in pentagon not large enough for intercontinental passenger
airplane Figure1: http://img16.exs.cx/img16/4381/Sept11th.jpg
White Bomb right side fuselage - Figure2:
http://img7.exs.cx/img7/9837/wtc.jpg
Source Cable Video Feeds:
Part1: http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/08-m...Plane_Site.zip
Part2: http://66.90.75.92/suprnova//torrent...E_SVCD.torrent

Here is Donald Rumsfeld's exact quote untwisted and intact, definitely
not misquoted:

"Here we're talking about [using] plastic knives, and [also] using an
American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and [also using]
the missile to damage this [Pentagon] building"

Can't you read HE SAYS: "AND the missile"
"AND THE MISSILE to damage this [Pentagon] building!"

A freudian slip? Nobody cares about your Reply opinion, this is news
not an argument over our professional interpretation of obvious
photo-documented facts. Do not reply in disagreement unless you have a
professional Aircraft/Building Expert Level Degree.

If you are not an building or aircraft expert you don't have the right
to disagree: You Yourself said it would disintegrate upon impact, then
there would be some wreckage, but there is none. Several hundred tons
of metal, engines, and passenger seats would be strewn about. A
passenger jet aeroplane that has crashed into land has never
disintegrated into dust.

In Fact you are right about the fact that a passenger jet would not
penetrate through wall after wall maintaining that same small diameter
it has which is shown in the picture of it attached to the wing. Only
a bunker buster bomb would penetrate that far yet leave a hole one
quarter of the real size of a 767 fuselage before exploding deep
inside that is because it was developed with Osama Bin Laden finding
cave penetration capabilities, hence the bunkerbuster designation.

The Bunker Buster Missile bomb shaped object below the fuselage shown
on CNN on video footage from five different angles all show the bomb
shattering glass as it enters. That shows you the exact same diameter
as the hole in the pentagon that was made by an F14 jetfighter
dropping a bunker buster bomb on the pentagon. It is a laser/radar
guided weapon so the F14 jetfighter fired a bunkerbuster missile. In
the WTC how do you explain the time interval of the bomb being set to
go off exactly half of the time interval selected for the first tower?

Flight 77, the 767 that everyone was told hit the pentagon as well as
all the planes that were suuposedly in the attack lost radar contact
over Nebraska, meaning probably all planes and occupants landed and
were disposed of like trash, we know they didn't hit the pentagon.
They were killed as well as those 3000+ who were killed by explosives
in the twin towers of the World Trade Center. The blackbox homing
beacon for radar tracking may have been affixed to the bunkerbuster
missile to be launched from the F14 Tomcat fighter jet. That explains
it's amazing 180degree turn flight path that no inexperienced flight
school student terrorist would be able to pull off.

From the 9|11 Documentary of FDNY Engine-7 Firefighters on the scene
at ground Zero said this:
"It [looked like] they had detonated [the tower], It [looked like]
they had planned to take out a building. It went boom, boom, boom,
boom, boom, all the way down."
-Captain Dennis Tardio talking about Tower-1 collapse

"Building 7 went down too?"
All firefighters were stunned to see Building 7 detonated when it is
impossible to wire it properly in the hours they had, it must have
been prewired to have been detonated. It was extremely far from the
Twin Towers and was not hit by a plane, and even the ASE Official
experts admit noone will ever know why it needed to be detonated. Fire
was the official explanation but no steel structure around the world
has ever collapsed or been more than slightly damaged by fire, because
as a giant heatsink made of steel, it will not melt unless explosives
are used. There is no answer as to how they wired it in such an
impossibly short time. They wanted to destroy the contained Enron
documents showing Bush's culpability in the Fraud Investigation.
Eradicate Bush's guilt and also the top floor contained the City's
Office of Emergency Management Control Center, the perfect place to
plant the homing beacon so that each remotely-controlled plane coming
from opposite sides would hit the towers where they did. Only the 757
and 767 planes used have remote control as a feature. Boeing Aircraft
experts agree that only when remote control is in use can the planes
exhibit such intense G flight manuevers as seen on those five tapes of
the "attacks". Remote control autopilot is a test mode used to unlock
the outer limits of the planes performance envelope but when manned
the onboard automatic pilot flight computer prevents the unconscious
state that would result from those high gravity forces.

"That was no American Airlines [Plane], That was [definitely] no
American Airlines [Plane]"
-Eyewitness near GroundZero
Look at the video and tell me you can see a passenger window in that
cargo jet. I think someone at the airport would have noticed the giant
bomb on the side of the plane!

Don't waste space on this post by stating you do not agree without
stating the ridiculous manner in which you could bold-faced lie when
the truth is staring you right in the face. We know you want the glory
of having killed the story for your boss George W. Bush, but this is
archived and it will come back to haunt you for revenge of trying to
perpetuate the coverup.

Research and then present us with facts that disagree with anything we
have said, we have presented our evidence. Do NOT reply without some
evidence of your own, this is not a place for random flame messages!

Do NOT state "That is your interpretation" without stating your
different interpretation, however foolish. And don't say the plane
disappeared because everyone knows that things don't disappear. This
is not WonderLand where fanciful magic talk is taken seriously. Just
look at the George W. Bush money motive behind it and the Enron and
Worldcom and Martha Stewart Scandals and you can see how money is the
root of this evil.

The Terminator head was added as a commentator along with the caption
that explains that nothing in the frame including the tiny pentagon
hole has been edited. The video shows this in greater detail.

Leave your talk of Carter and Shakespeare and talk of Bush the
Terrible! Anyone who thinks "naïve the fear that ultimate power
inevitably corrupts" is a moron or is hoping to get his hands on some
of that ultimate power. LubeIT or Lose IT!

Bush Whacker

Bush Whacker wrote:

> Paranoid means it is not backed up by photographic evidence BUT this
> is backed up by PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE!
>
> In Fact you are right about the fact that a passenger jet would not
> penetrate through wall after wall maintaining that same small diameter
> it has which is shown in the picture of it attached to the wing. Only
> a bunker buster bomb would penetrate that far yet leave a hole one
> quarter of the real size of a 767 fuselage before exploding deep
> inside that is because it was developed with Osama Bin Laden finding
> cave penetration capabilities, hence the bunkerbuster designation.



OK, so what would happen if a 747 hit a tower block? Oh, no, wait, it's
already happened. And it didn't leave a 747-size hole.
http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/el-al.htm


(But wait, it was an El Al flight, so it was obviously Mossad doing,
ummm, something or other, errr.......)

Owain Sutton

The plane ran out of gas, so now it can never land.

"David L. Webb" <> wrote in message
news:david.l.webb-...
> In article <>,
> (Bush Whacker) wrote:
>
>> We Know NOW that NO JETLINER crashed into the pentagon, Donald
>> Rumsfeld said it! (see the quote)
>
> Then where *is* the airliner that supposedly crashed into the
> Pentagon?! As far as is known, it never landed, and the passengers
> never returned to their families. Where is the plane now? Is it still
> flying around somewhere? Inquiring minds want to know!
>
> [...]

Joe Homebrew

Bush Whacker wrote:
> Paranoid means it is not backed up by photographic evidence BUT this
> is backed up by PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE!

Give it up. We know you're a Republican provocateur, and you're BORING.

--
John W. Kennedy
"Only an idiot fights a war on two fronts. Only the heir to the throne
of the kingdom of idiots would fight a war on twelve fronts"
-- J. Michael Straczynski. "Babylon 5", "Ceremonies of Light and Dark"

John W. Kennedy

Dude...

I am a democrat and I'd vote for Kerry but my county is solid democrat and I
didn't register in time...

But dude...

Get some meds bro...

See a doc seriously.

It was a plane.


geebus.............




"Bush Whacker" <> wrote in message
news: om...
> We Know NOW that NO JETLINER crashed into the pentagon, Donald
> Rumsfeld said it! (see the quote)
>
> We are not the first to know that a missile was used but those reports
> were silenced in the Mass Media by Bush.
>
> Are you guys retarded or just in love with G.W. Bush? Is it too
> amazing and terrible for you to accept the truth? Unless you are an
> aircraft expert SHUT UP! You are just trying to help bush get away
> with this crime he has obviously comitted. Look at the bomb attached
> under the wing of both planes! (Figure2*) (*see first post)
>
> Look at Figure1* and Watch the video linked "911 In Plane Site"*
>
> The evidence is unrefutable.
>
> It is morally wrong to kill World Trade Center Victims so I don't know
> what religion George Bush belongs to.
>
> Wait before you think this let me straighten you out on a few things
> you might be confused about:
>
> A plane that was 300 times larger wouldn't disintegrate into dust!
>
> If you're thinking:
>
> >I have seen the video where a F4 Phantom Fighter Jet tests the
> strength of a concrete wall built to withstand a nuclear blast and
> breaks up
>
> That was a special "nuclear shelter" wall meant to disintegrate things
> into a cloud of dust. The pentagon is made out of regular concrete!
> The window panes are intact except the two knocked out where the
> (bunkerbuster missile) entered.
>
> Also the F4 Phantom fighter jet is about the smallest and oldest
> jetfighter and weighs the tiniest fraction of what a huge brand-new
> 767 weighs. The 767 fuselage is four times wider than the hole made in
> the pentagon building.
>
> Your video shows one thing that if a plane were to hit a building the
> wreckage would not go through the wall like a bunkerbuster missile is
> designed to do, but it would break the plane into large pieces of
> wreckage like we have seen in previous crashes of jetliners on land,
> there would be a huge tail section, but the window panes are INTACT
> around a 16 foot hole making only two windows missing is just too
> small for anyone to believe the lie.
>
> >footage showing pieces of landing gear, fuselage & more
>
> There are no pictures of anything that can be identified as having
> come from a passenger jet.
>
> You cannot produce anything that can be identified as having come from
> a passenger jet. You are not an aircraft expert so it may have been a
> component of a missile. A bunkerbuster missile resembles a small
> aircraft it is so large since it was designed to allow armor
> penetration of heavy high-megaton multi-warhead nuclear weapons into
> the center of a building or bunker, to bust it more effectively. That
> is the nature of the wound to the pentagon building as seen by the
> pre-collpase photo (Figure1*) and not the extreme width of a top of
> the line brand new megapassenger jet airliner. The two giant turbine
> engines weighed many tons and surely would have made an impression
> yet there is no sign of the massive 9-foot tall turbine wheels that
> made of steel would have survived the impact. The full fuel tanks
> would have made the soil toxic yet there is no fuel in the soil.
>
> >There is copious evidence to suggest that flight 77 was hijacked by
> terrorists and crashed into the Pentagon exactly as described. There
> is no requirement to spin a highly fanciful and ultimately
> ludicrous 'conspiracy' when the evidence already says what happened.
>
> Who gave you this hearsay evidence but the conspirators, they told you
> what they wanted you to hear, what you expected to hear! We now have
> the evidence in Figure 1 that a jetliner WOULD have broken a few
> windows!
>
> Think with your brain and not your heart and realize if Bush had hired
> the "terrorists" he would have the most to gain. A bunker buster
> missile fired from an F14 Tomcat fighter jet is not within the
> experience nor possession of flight school students.
>
> >Bush might be the worst president in recent history, but it does not
> mean he had anything to do with it.
>
> Bush is no different than any other president besides the fact that he
> is the first one that we have photographic proof that he commited mass
> murder. It is not a conspiracy necessarily but the act of one man at
> least, George W. Bush. Considering John Kerry and he are related and
> are members of the same fraternity at the same time at the same
> college and are great friends behind the scenes we will have to
> investigate further who is involved.
>
> The discussion is over, look at the facts I have presented, now let's
> discuss what should be done about it in the Election of 2004.

s

(Bush Whacker) wrote in
news: om:

> Paranoid means it is not backed up by photographic evidence BUT this
> is backed up by PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE!

I'm so bushed I don't know just how you mean that,
but I will tell you this much:
In my mind the very *most* he is guilty of in the
tragic events of 9/11 is leaving America's collective
balls hanging in the breeze long enough to see who
would be stoopid enough to kick them.

Expect a longer response after I've had about 12 hours
sleep and time to wake up completely.

Clyde Frog