Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > C++ > Re: C++ standard and C++/CLI

Reply
Thread Tools

Re: C++ standard and C++/CLI

 
 
Tommy McDaniel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-28-2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Francis Glassborow <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
> In article <(E-Mail Removed) >, Tommy
> McDaniel <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
> >I think you misunderstood what I said then (or maybe I did not state
> >it clearly enough). Obviously, an implementation that provides what is
> >required and then some is still a conforming implementation. My
> >argument was that those extensions do not then automatically become
> >part of C++ itself just because they are provided on one
> >implementation (or any number of implementations). I know that
> >implementations exceed the letter of the law, and I am happy that they
> >do, even implementations that I might not like (I do not know why, I
> >just do).

>
> No, I think you do not understand the distinction between C++ and
> C++/CLI. I have many caveats on C++/CLI but they are not based on a
> false belief that C++/CLI changes C++ anymore than that the Posix C
> binding change C (though Posix is seriously invasive of C header files)


And as I told Ioannis Vranos yesterday, this is why censorship is bad.
Read what I told him in comp.lang.c++ at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...ing.google.com,
and then read the same post I referred him to that addressed what you
speak of (a reply to you yourself, in fact, that was censored from
comp.lang.c++.moderated) at
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com.
I think that I had already said what I said in that post plenty of
other times, but memories are short around these parts.

Tommy McDaniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBCCF/VB8FYP9YqDcRAsA7AJ950JRhBPVyo9rTLeCmpebEByiobgCeJO jH
JUBak0BNhYzGL8hYwRHB2NQ=
=MsEm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
standard libraries don't behave like standard 'libraries' Sriram Srinivasan Python 13 11-12-2009 06:05 PM
What are the standard network functions provided in standard C? disappearedng@gmail.com C Programming 5 06-10-2008 08:57 PM
How to redirect a "system" standard output and standard error to avariable (Linux) Venks Ruby 5 12-06-2007 12:21 AM
add pexpect to the standard library, standard "install" mechanism. funkyj Python 5 01-20-2006 08:35 PM
How standard is the standard library? steve.leach Python 1 04-18-2005 04:07 PM



Advertisments