![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Question regarding DVDSHRINK V3.2...
I have observed, during the encoding process of a movie: The first time I encode the movie, DVDSHRINK encodes with a rate of approx. 12,000 KB/s - and the encoding process takes approx 10 minutes... Now, if I immediatly then try to encode the same movie again, using the same reader and same parameters, the encoding process now only runs with a rate of approx. 4,000 KB/s - and naturally takes longer. - A reboot of the system and running DVDSHRINK again now raises the rate up to approx. 12,000 KB/s again. Howcome the second encoding lowers the bitrate ? The drive is hardcoded to ULTRA DMA (not PIO which would explain the difference) - is it a problem with the DVDSHRINK, the ATAPI driver or something else ? Looking for clues... Cheers, Joern. Jørn Jensen |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Jørn Jensen" <> wrote in
news:439809e7$0$47084$ k: > I have observed, during the encoding process of a movie: The first time > I encode the movie, DVDSHRINK encodes with a rate of approx. 12,000 KB/s > - and the encoding process takes approx 10 minutes... I can't answer your question, but wonder how you get nearly twice the rate I do. Could it be my using an older DVD Shrink version (3.1.7.6)? Maybe because you use the Analysis option before encoding? I usually just accept the default compression without removing any components. The compression rate is typically a little over 50% for me. I have a Pentium D 3ghz, 1GB RAM. One processor core shows as being fully used for this. My hard disk is a 7200 rpm 260GB. I could see this being a weakness, but since the core is fully utilized, I have doubt. Tom |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Tom" <> wrote in message news:l2Vlf.9563$... > "Jørn Jensen" <> wrote in > news:439809e7$0$47084$ k: > >> I have observed, during the encoding process of a movie: The first time >> I encode the movie, DVDSHRINK encodes with a rate of approx. 12,000 KB/s >> - and the encoding process takes approx 10 minutes... > > I can't answer your question, but wonder how you get nearly twice the rate > I > do. > > Could it be my using an older DVD Shrink version (3.1.7.6)? it's free why not get the latest version? > > Maybe because you use the Analysis option before encoding? > > I usually just accept the default compression without removing any > components. The compression rate is typically a little over 50% for me. > > I have a Pentium D 3ghz, 1GB RAM. One processor core shows as being fully > used for this. > > My hard disk is a 7200 rpm 260GB. I could see this being a weakness, but > since the core is fully utilized, I have doubt. > You dont have to remove stuff, just set the extras to the lowest percentage, highest compression, making sure the movie itself gets the least amount of compression. Personally i find no value in trailers and music videos so i remove them, using the 'still picture' setting giving the movie the most space on the eventual disc. Also turfing the foreign language subtitles, audio etc brings the percentage up on the main movie As for the analyse thing, dvdshrink will do the best possible shrink job if you let it do a deepscan before compression That "piracy is a crime" horseshit also gets the intrusively loud annoying ****ing audio removed. ahhhh silence. You wouldn't steal a car....well I would if I had to... Fuzzy Wuzzy |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
From the dvd shrink forum.
if you're talking about reading the dvdr disc you just burned - reading a dvdr is different to reading an original (s-l) & takes longer. apart from that, you may try closing shrink fully & then re-starting it again. if it's not the above, then you may have buffer/cache problems. they're not being emptied & refreshed fully, or you have lots of other progs/apps starting/running in the background. if you have "incd" installed, uninstall it. "Jørn Jensen" <> wrote in message news:439809e7$0$47084$ k... > Question regarding DVDSHRINK V3.2... > > > I have observed, during the encoding process of a movie: The first time I > encode the movie, DVDSHRINK encodes with a rate of approx. 12,000 KB/s - > and the encoding process takes approx 10 minutes... > > Now, if I immediatly then try to encode the same movie again, using the > same reader and same parameters, the encoding process now only runs with a > rate of approx. 4,000 KB/s - and naturally takes longer. - A reboot of the > system and running DVDSHRINK again now raises the rate up to approx. > 12,000 KB/s again. > > Howcome the second encoding lowers the bitrate ? The drive is hardcoded to > ULTRA DMA (not PIO which would explain the difference) - is it a problem > with the DVDSHRINK, the ATAPI driver or something else ? > > > Looking for clues... > > > Cheers, > Joern. > Joe Moonen |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Filthy Mcnasty | DVD Video | 0 | 04-25-2005 04:29 AM |
| DVDshrink question | Joe Blow | DVD Video | 9 | 01-26-2005 05:58 AM |
| ProCoder 2 DVD tutorial with Ben Waggoner... | DSL.net News | DVD Video | 1 | 09-17-2004 06:30 AM |
| DVDShrink question | KublaiKhan | DVD Video | 13 | 09-04-2004 06:02 AM |
| **Maybe not the place to ask (encoding question) | BballJunky | DVD Video | 2 | 12-22-2003 03:38 AM |