Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:45:59 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<> wrote:

>George Hammond wrote:
>> On 10 Oct 2005 10:42:17 -0700, wrote:
>>
>>>> Even someone of your extremely limited means could cobble together such
>>>> a movie using static images stitched together with free video tools.
>>> He probably did, but it simply didn't work the way he had 'predicted'.
>>
>>
>>> There is no such mechanism that he claims,
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Oh yes there is.
>>
>>
>>
>>> it does not work, it cannot
>>> work.
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Oh yes it does.
>>
>>> As most religionists would he rejects the failure as being the
>>> fault of something else: the computer is too fast, or too slow, or not
>>> religious enough; the program is doing it wrong; no one else is
>>> intelligent enough to understand; anything but that he is a failure.
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> You can't do it with a computer...AVI and MPEG's only run at 12
>> frames/second because of the slowness of the CPU.
>
>That's a complete and total lie.
>
>I owned (and still have the case from) a PII 450Mhz that was able to
>play DVDs, full screen 6 years ago or so. Any computer then or since
>could manage it without breaking a sweat. In fact virtually every home
>computer sold with a DVD drive in the last five years has a software
>player for playing DVDs.

[Hammond]
Yeah... that's because any computer monitor can be used as
a "t.v." if it has the appropriate software for generating
a t.v. signal. So what.... there's no way to "edit" a DVD
and make an invisble move out of it.

Like I say, you'd have to use videotape.... edit it on
a computer.... and then play it on a VCR.




>
>But you might bleat - DVD is MPEG2. Yes it is, and AVI can wrap MPEG2,
>MPEG1, MPEG4 and dozens if not hundreds of other codecs. And that
>includes lossless codecs too.

[Hammond]
Yeah... but you can't edit a DVD, so what good is it in
this case.

>
>First person shooter computer games go even faster and can easily top 60
>frames per second at high resolutions with modern graphics cards.

[Hammond]
fprget modern graphics cards.... a VCR is easier to get hold of.


>
>> You have to do it with a video tape and a VCR using a computer
>> VIDEO EDITOR to edit the tape.
>>

>> Lets get on it rich boys... get your thumbs out of your ass and
>> TEST Hammond's TESTABLE PREDICITON of the Scientific
>> Proof of God. ... whaddau think all those expensive toys are
>> for? Watching porno films?
>
>It's your prediction. You demonstrate it.

[Hammond]
THEY are the ones who demanded a testable prediciton,
let them test it.
Yawn?

========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
=======================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
===========================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===========================

George Hammond

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:05:08 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
<nospam@****-off-and-die.com> wrote:

>George Hammond, <>, the bacterial, odoriferous
>miscreant, and dog-whipper, cackled:
>
>
>> [Hammond]
>> Yeah... that's because any computer monitor can be used as
>> a "t.v." if it has the appropriate software for generating
>> a t.v. signal. So what.... there's no way to "edit" a DVD
>> and make an invisble move out of it.
>>
>> Like I say, you'd have to use videotape.... edit it on
>> a computer.... and then play it on a VCR.
>
>So, is that a Phase Alternating Line playback VCR, which plays back at 25
>frames per second, or is it an NTSC VCR, which plays back at 29.97fps
>frames per second unless it's recorded on NTSC film, which records at
>23.976fps, George?

[Hammond]
Makes no difference.... since the "refresh rate" of the human brain
itself (known as the PFF=picture fusion frequency) is 15 Hz....
therefore the average person (IQ=100) cannot SEE more than 15 frames
per second.... all the rest are unnecessary extras put in there for a
variety of odd reasons, such as:

1. The sound track will warble at less than 24 fps.
2. Haf the powerline frequency happens to be 30 Hz.
3. Blah, blah, blah

this is proven by the fact that all movies (silent moves) made
between 1890 and 1920 were shot a 16 frames per second.


<snip, typographical crap>

========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
=======================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
===========================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===========================

George Hammond