The Next-Generation Disc: What Should It Be?
The battle for the successor to DVD continues. The winner will be the
format consumers flock to.
Melissa J. Perenson, PC World
Friday, July 15, 2005
No one wants to back the losing team. And today's consumers are savvy
enough to know they don't want to be caught anywhere near the quagmire
that is the turf war between competing next-generation optical disc
formats Blu-ray Disc and HD-DVD. One of these formats will replace the
current DVD standard for delivery of packaged entertainment, including
video and games. (For more on the battle between Blu-ray Disc and
HD-DVD, see my February column.)
Consumers want to go with the winning standard, but they also want
other things from the successor to DVD. The Blu-ray Disc Association
is touting a new study it commissioned to gauge consumers' attitudes
about the next-generation disc format, and the results shed light on
aspects of consumer thinking about the future consumption of
entertainment. The Blu-ray Disc Association--which includes the likes
of Apple, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Panasonic, Philips, Pioneer, and
Sony--released the results of the independent study in early July.
The State of the War
A bit of background for those who don't follow these things: Blu-ray
Disc and HD-DVD (backed by NEC and Toshiba) are both formats for
high-capacity optical discs designed to play back video content as
well as to store games and data. The competing formats are not
compatible with one another; if you buy one type of disc, you won't be
able to play it in the other type of player.
Sidestepping the technical minutiae of the two formats, the most
obvious difference from a user standpoint lies in their capacity:
Blu-ray Disc supports 25GB on a single-layer disc and 50GB on a
double-layer disc, while HD-DVD supports 15GB on a single-layer disc
and 30GB on a double-layer disc. Hollywood movie studios have publicly
split on support for the two formats: 20th Century Fox, ESPN, MGM,
Miramax, Sony Pictures, Touchstone, and Walt Disney Company are behind
Blu-ray; and HBO and New Line Cinema, Paramount Pictures, Universal
Studios, and Warner Brothers are behind HD-DVD. Further complicating
the matter: None of these studios has an exclusive agreement with the
camp they've backed.
Earlier this year the two sides were rumored to be in "peace talks";
however, those talks apparently broke down this spring, and the two
camps are proceeding apace towards bringing their respective products
to market. Still, the optimistic among us have reason to hold onto a
sliver of hope: Warring parties agreed on today's DVD format at the
last minute, too. Everyone--Hollywood studios, hardware makers, and
the consumers whose patronage will keep both in business--knows that a
format war will only constrain the potential growth of the high-def
movie distribution market. But that doesn't mean I'd bet the condo on
an amicable resolution this time.
The latest word is that we'll still see products this year--although
not necessarily as early as some of the original projections that the
HD-DVD camp tossed out last January at the Consumer Electronics Show
in Las Vegas. Holding up progress for both formats is the finalization
of Advanced Access Content System copy protection controls, a spec
that was originally expected in March 2005 and has yet to be finalized
as of this writing.
It's fine for everyone involved to take their time to get the
technology nailed down and do it right before they launch products,
but consider this: With neither camp having locked in its format for
commercially pressed video discs (the discs on which Hollywood content
will be distributed for the foreseeable future), the likelihood of
seeing products by September or October as HD-DVD posited at CES, or
even by year's end as some Blu-ray proponents originally projected, is
getting increasingly dim. I wouldn't be surprised to see some products
surface in limited quantities. But given what I'm hearing now, we're
unlikely to find consumer disc players or recorders on shelves for
this holiday shopping season.
Compatibility Is King
Now, on to the aforementioned Blu-ray Disc Association study. It was
conducted in May 2005 by Penn, Schoen, and Berland Associates, which
quizzed 1202 consumers aged 18 to 64 years on their views and
perceptions about the successor to today's DVD format. Of the survey
sample, nearly 40 percent (392 respondents) already own an HDTV setup.
Many of the study's findings seem obvious, but they nonetheless back
up some common-sense assumptions about how people use and consume
media.
Of the top seven qualities that survey respondents said they want in
next-generation media and players, four focused on the twin desires of
backward- and cross-compatibility: the ability to play today's DVDs on
next-generation players and to use next-generation discs in other
devices, such as gaming consoles. The strong support for compatibility
every which way you can have it reflects buying and usage trends that
I hear echoed by friends and colleagues alike.
First, no one wants to ditch their current DVD collections. In fact,
the most desired quality in the mystery player of the future was that
it should maintain backward compatibility with existing DVD content: A
whopping 70 percent of respondents back this one.
Second, not everyone wants to invest in new HDTVs to replace their
existing TV setups. I don't know about you, but while I was growing
up, we never got rid of a TV until it died--and even then, Dad
sometimes brought it to life again, after which it found its way to
some other room such as the basement, so it was near the treadmill and
laundry room. Most U.S. homes have two or more TVs, and not all of
them will be replaced by swanky, wide-screen high-def models.
I suspect that most people are focusing on upgrading the common areas
first, such as the living room or den, with other rooms of the house
to follow. And I expect a similar pattern for upgrading the playback
equipment attached to those secondary and tertiary TVs: Those older
TVs might be accompanied by a $40 no-name DVD player, but they won't
be the first priority for an expensive HD-capable playback box.
These impressions gel with the study's responses. Sixty percent of
respondents want the next-generation disc to be able to contain both
wide-screen and full-screen versions of a movie. And 57 percent want a
dual-sided disc that could play a movie both in current DVD players at
standard definition, and in the next-generation mystery player at high
definition.
Play It Anywhere
The fact that consumers were interested in using the same disc in
different ways and devices surprised the Blu-ray Disc folks who
commissioned this study. "The idea of a hybrid disc that works in both
an existing DVD player and a Blu-ray Disc player was very strong, and
underscores how convergence bubbled up to the top [of consumers'
concerns]," notes Marty Gordon, vice president of Philips Electronics
and spokesperson for the Blu-ray Disc Association. "The ability to
play a disc [anywhere] was very important," he says.
Incidentally, the Blu-ray Disc spec already has a provision for two
variations of a dual-sided disc that combines existing formats with
the Blu-ray format, similar to what today's Dual-Disc format does for
CD-Audio and DVD-Video. The first combo, for Blu-ray/DVD Hybrid discs,
enables a disc with one side that acts as a 25GB BD-ROM (like a
DVD-ROM, only of the Blu-ray variety) and the other that acts as a
8.5GB dual-layer DVD-ROM. The second combo calls for a Blu-ray/CD
Hybrid disc, with one side featuring a single-layer 25GB BD-ROM and
the other a 700MB CD-ROM, either as data or CD-Audio.
Finally, no one wants to keep a score card to remember which player
they can pop a disc into; you want the disc to play in anything,
whether it's your gaming console, PC, or set-top recorder. Once again,
the study results bear this out: 62 percent of respondents indicate
they'd prefer a disc that be played in any of those three devices.
That makes sense, considering that the popularity of DVD-ROM drives on
computers was jumpstarted by the proliferation of DVD-Video, not DVD
data, discs. For those of you keeping score at home, Sony has
announced it will support Blu-ray Disc in the PlayStation 3;
Microsoft, meanwhile, has not announced HD-DVD support for its Xbox
360, but rumors are still swirling that a future version of the Xbox
might.
High-Stakes Game
Given this new level of convergence, it's possible that either Blu-ray
Disc or HD-DVD will define tangible (meaning not downloaded) home
entertainment in the next decade. As to which one will come out on
top, I won't hazard a guess just yet.
The Blu-ray Disc Association's Gordon was unable to confirm, deny, or
otherwise comment on the reported negotiations between the powerhouse
companies in the Blu-ray and HD-DVD camps earlier this year. "There
was a lot of rumor and speculation," he says. "You can't always
believe what you read."
The prospect of unifying the formats, he says, is "very difficult, but
we still have hope." The difficulty, he adds, is that "we're talking
about two different physical formats, and two different philosophies.
The HD-DVD philosophy has been [concerned with] the industry: cheaper
discs, easier replication. From the beginning, the Blu-ray philosophy
has been focused on the consumer benefits."
I found that an interesting, and valid, observation on Gordon's part:
After all, HD-DVD's biggest benefits over Blu-ray involve the cost of
disc production. The HD-DVD format has its evolutionary origins in the
existing DVD format, which translates to lower costs for media
production and disc replication. The cynical among us--myself
included--can assume those lower costs will probably never be
reflected in the prices we see at the checkout counter at Best Buy or
Costco; they'll just mean a higher profit margin to studios.
By contrast, Blu-ray Disc's higher capacity and roadmap for increased
capacity (up to 100GB on a single disc has been achieved in laboratory
conditions), makes me think that the backers of this format are
looking out for my long-term interests as a consumer. After all, if
I'm going to buy my umpteenth version of the Star Wars trilogy, I'll
want the highest-quality video I can get on the next-generation disc.
Furthermore, I already have plenty of content to store on those
discs--so as far as I'm concerned, the more capacity, the better.
As optimistic as I'd like to be about a satisfactory resolution to the
format wars, I'm fairly certain that won't happen. Still, I'm going to
keep hoping against hope that the two camps can resolve their
differences--in spite of how unlikely that might seem, given the fact
that to do so means, for all intents and purposes, that one camp will
likely have to write off substantial R&D costs and lose out on
potential royalties.
The industry is not blind to the impending nightmare if both formats
go to market. As Gordon notes, "No one wants a format war. The thought
of one fills everyone--consumers and industry alike--with angst."
Perhaps the most telling stat in the whole study is the one that
indicates consumers' indecision as to which format they'd choose if
Hollywood studios remain split. Technology and company backing aside,
when consumers were asked which disc they'd choose, if the only
consideration is that "two similar, but non-compatible formats of
next-generation discs were supported by different entertainment
companies," a whopping 67 percent say they're undecided. That doesn't
bode well for future sales of anybody's players or media.
Comments or questions? Send Melissa J. Perenson an e-mail.
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/...071505X,00.asp
===
"We have seen the enemy, and it is us."
-- Walt Kelly
Similar Threads
