![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I have had a debate on the following and would like some
feedback by individuals who are willing to post their opinions: Two gradutes. One goes to a somewhat distinguished college and one goes to a local community college. Both go for the same technical field. Both have no experience. The graduated who went through community college knows a great deal more about the study than the graduated who went to the distinguished college. They both go for the same Entry Level technical position. Based on college level "Status" and testing the employer is sure to give, who would have a better chance??? Thank You... Phil |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
The graduate from the distinguished college. It's VERY unlikely that an
employer has a sophisticated enough pre-employment testing system to separate the two. Credentials do count. Fact of life... Podunk U is not as esteemed as Harvard. Life's not fair but who said it was? Yes, idiots can and do graduate from Ivy League colleges (I'm not going to mention a certain US president), but there's a reason people want that sheepskin from such places. Grog "Phil" <> wrote in message news:26a8c01c38e98$3f562810$... > I have had a debate on the following and would like some > feedback by individuals who are willing to post their > opinions: > > Two gradutes. One goes to a somewhat distinguished college > and one goes to a local community college. Both go for the > same technical field. Both have no experience. > > The graduated who went through community college knows a > great deal more about the study than the graduated who > went to the distinguished college. > > They both go for the same Entry Level technical position. > Based on college level "Status" and testing the employer > is sure to give, who would have a better chance??? > > Thank You... Grog in Ohio |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
> They both go for the same Entry Level technical position.
> Based on college level "Status" and testing the employer > is sure to give, who would have a better chance??? > All things being equal, except for college "status" (which they NEVER are....no things are ever equal...there are too many intangibles when it comes to prospective employment), I'd say the higher status graduate has the upper hand. Although, thankfully, not by much. My main reason for this, is higher status universities have higher academic standards than your run-of-the-mill CC. This means that, on average, your University grad is smarter than your CC grad. And most CC's are 2 year programs. Universities are usually 4. More years = more classes = more training. Of course, this is NOT always the case. There are plenty of CC grads who are doing just fine in the field. For your first job, college status may be an issue, but after that, it's all about track record - employment history. (and, obviously, what you actually know) My .02 KB Ken Briscoe |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
What is the employer paying, what is the expected turnover rate, how much
"extra" unrelated crap is the person expected to do? Finally, how large is the shop? As a hiring manager you should make some decisions as to how your prospective employee will fit the culture of your company. So, if both were equally qualified, the instinct of the supervisor should be the deciding factor. If it were a corporate job, the edge would probably go to the College grad.. In a mid-size company, a toss up. In a smaller, but established company, even...maybe a slight edge to the CC guy, based probable turn over and flexibility. "Phil" <> wrote in message news:26a8c01c38e98$3f562810$... > I have had a debate on the following and would like some > feedback by individuals who are willing to post their > opinions: > > Two gradutes. One goes to a somewhat distinguished college > and one goes to a local community college. Both go for the > same technical field. Both have no experience. > > The graduated who went through community college knows a > great deal more about the study than the graduated who > went to the distinguished college. > > They both go for the same Entry Level technical position. > Based on college level "Status" and testing the employer > is sure to give, who would have a better chance??? > > Thank You... --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.524 / Virus Database: 321 - Release Date: 10/6/2003 Zenner |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Having attended classes at three universities, one 4-year college, and two
community colleges, I would only partially agree with this statement. I wouldn't say that a university grad is 'smarter' than a CC grad, however, I would say that a university grad is more capable than a CC grad. Also, I wouldn't say that the university setting provides more training vs a community college. University and academic college classes are more on the theoretical, non-applied level, whereas CC courses are typically presented in an application context. Thus, the CC grad would potentially have more practical capabilities upon graduation, whereas the university grad has more of a foundation in how to learn new concepts and ideas, how to solve nebulous, narrowly defined problems, and how to conduct research. I would have to say that it would depend on the forseen advancement of the individual within the firm. If it is a purely technical, hands on field in which only on-the-job technical skills are required, requiring relatively narrowly defined new skill development, then it would be a toss up on salary requirements. If the person is hired for potential advancement within the firm, possibly taking on management responsibilities, etc., then I would have to favor a applicant from a university background. -- Thanks, Martin Schmid, EIT, CCSA, MCDBA, MCSE "Ken Briscoe" <> wrote in message news:... > > They both go for the same Entry Level technical position. > > Based on college level "Status" and testing the employer > > is sure to give, who would have a better chance??? > > > > All things being equal, except for college "status" (which they NEVER > are....no things are ever equal...there are too many intangibles when it > comes to prospective employment), I'd say the higher status graduate has the > upper hand. Although, thankfully, not by much. My main reason for this, is > higher status universities have higher academic standards than your > run-of-the-mill CC. This means that, on average, your University grad is > smarter than your CC grad. And most CC's are 2 year programs. Universities > are usually 4. More years = more classes = more training. Of course, this is > NOT always the case. There are plenty of CC grads who are doing just fine in > the field. For your first job, college status may be an issue, but after > that, it's all about track record - employment history. (and, obviously, > what you actually know) > > My .02 > > KB > > Martin Schmid |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah, I can't believe Clinton got through law school.
"Grog in Ohio" <> wrote in message news:... > The graduate from the distinguished college. It's VERY unlikely that an > employer has a sophisticated enough pre-employment testing system to > separate the two. Credentials do count. > > Fact of life... Podunk U is not as esteemed as Harvard. Life's not fair but > who said it was? Yes, idiots can and do graduate from Ivy League colleges > (I'm not going to mention a certain US president), but there's a reason > people want that sheepskin from such places. > > Grog Bill |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Answer: the one with the best problem solving skills and
the most dedication to the task (hence the level of education). >-----Original Message----- >I have had a debate on the following and would like some >feedback by individuals who are willing to post their >opinions: > >Two gradutes. One goes to a somewhat distinguished college >and one goes to a local community college. Both go for the >same technical field. Both have no experience. > >The graduated who went through community college knows a >great deal more about the study than the graduated who >went to the distinguished college. > >They both go for the same Entry Level technical position. >Based on college level "Status" and testing the employer >is sure to give, who would have a better chance??? > >Thank You... >. > Eric |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pay Range for entry level A+ Cert. Job ?? | A+ Certified Professional | A+ Certification | 25 | 12-05-2005 08:55 PM |
| As growth slows, Hollywood faces a DVD standoff. | Allan | DVD Video | 0 | 07-11-2005 02:10 PM |
| More Electronics Firms Join Debate to End DVD War. | Allan | DVD Video | 0 | 04-22-2005 02:03 PM |
| DVD Verdict reviews: THE EDUCATION OF SONNY CARSON and more! | DVD Verdict | DVD Video | 0 | 04-14-2005 09:11 AM |