Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > DVD Video
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

DVD Video - Re: Has DivX become unnecessary?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-24-2005, 01:36 AM   #1
Default Re: Has DivX become unnecessary?


"Yef" <> wrote in
news: ups.com:

> Hi all,
>
> Recently it occurred to me that all the time and
> computing power that people devote to backing up
> their DVDs and converting them to DivX, while
> virtuous in its way, seems bound to become
> unnecessary. DivX was important when few people
> had DVD writers, and before dual-layer writers
> were available.


Just cuz you have a DVD writer doesn't mean everyone else does.
Back up your claim. You can't.

> But now it is possible to back up
> VOB files themselves and to play them back,
> in perfect original condition, with no need to
> compress and lose any amount of quality or to
> experience sound quality problems. Conversion
> always introduces errors and noise, but that
> conversion, at least for now during this lull before
> high-definition players, has become unnecessary.
>


If I want perfection I buy/rent the DVD. Many movies I view once and
never again. I give away the CDs since they are inexpensive.


> However, I have downloaded a high-def trailer
> from divx.com and I can say with certainty that
> high-def is the real future. It looks much better.
> Too bad high-def discs and drives aren't available yet.
>
> Yef
>
>





sentry
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2005, 10:17 AM   #2
Gardner
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Has DivX become unnecessary?
I must admit I find fewer and fewer reasons for using DivX. Storage is
cheap now, and files can be compressed by Windows XP.

Perhaps the emergence of personal pocket media players may be its salvation.

"sentry" <> wrote in message
news:...
> "Yef" <> wrote in
> news: ups.com:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Recently it occurred to me that all the time and
>> computing power that people devote to backing up
>> their DVDs and converting them to DivX, while
>> virtuous in its way, seems bound to become
>> unnecessary. DivX was important when few people
>> had DVD writers, and before dual-layer writers
>> were available.

>
> Just cuz you have a DVD writer doesn't mean everyone else does.
> Back up your claim. You can't.
>
>> But now it is possible to back up
>> VOB files themselves and to play them back,
>> in perfect original condition, with no need to
>> compress and lose any amount of quality or to
>> experience sound quality problems. Conversion
>> always introduces errors and noise, but that
>> conversion, at least for now during this lull before
>> high-definition players, has become unnecessary.
>>

>
> If I want perfection I buy/rent the DVD. Many movies I view once and
> never again. I give away the CDs since they are inexpensive.
>
>
>> However, I have downloaded a high-def trailer
>> from divx.com and I can say with certainty that
>> high-def is the real future. It looks much better.
>> Too bad high-def discs and drives aren't available yet.
>>
>> Yef
>>
>>

>
>





Gardner
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2005, 05:10 AM   #3
yesitsme
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Has DivX become unnecessary?
sentry wrote:

>"Yef" <> wrote in
>news: oups.com:
>
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Recently it occurred to me that all the time and
>>computing power that people devote to backing up
>>their DVDs and converting them to DivX, while
>>virtuous in its way, seems bound to become
>>unnecessary. DivX was important when few people
>>had DVD writers, and before dual-layer writers
>>were available.
>>
>>

>
>Just cuz you have a DVD writer doesn't mean everyone else does.
>Back up your claim. You can't.
>
>
>
>>But now it is possible to back up
>>VOB files themselves and to play them back,
>>in perfect original condition, with no need to
>>compress and lose any amount of quality or to
>>experience sound quality problems. Conversion
>>always introduces errors and noise, but that
>>conversion, at least for now during this lull before
>>high-definition players, has become unnecessary.
>>
>>
>>

>
>If I want perfection I buy/rent the DVD. Many movies I view once and
>never again. I give away the CDs since they are inexpensive.
>
>
>
>
>>However, I have downloaded a high-def trailer
>>from divx.com and I can say with certainty that
>>high-def is the real future. It looks much better.
>>Too bad high-def discs and drives aren't available yet.
>>
>>Yef
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

You're right really. Why use DivX; and other compressions - for
ripping movies anyways - when the original is the best going ..
UNless, the original isn't from something that's a higher quality..


jason






--
((¯`'·.¸(¯`'·.((¯`'·.¸ * jason bean* ¸.·'´¯))¸.·'´¯)¸.·'´¯))

For me , said Sherlock Holmes, "there still remains the cocaine bottle,"
and he reached his hand up for it.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~jabean
http://musicpage.kicks-ass.org/




yesitsme
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Has DivX become unnecessary? Yef DVD Video 36 04-02-2005 03:11 AM
DVD battle goes high-definition Allan DVD Video 11 02-10-2005 08:45 PM
[liveupdate] Digest Number 47 Ablang DVD Video 0 08-14-2004 03:29 AM
Throwaway DVDs: $6 to $7 Each -- Sept. 9. Scot Gardner DVD Video 80 09-15-2003 05:05 AM
Re: Throwaway DVD Question Scot Gardner DVD Video 64 09-12-2003 06:20 PM




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46