![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
DVD Video - Quality Differences-DVR +/-r and +/-rw |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Are there any inherent differences in quality between DVD +r or -r? Same
questions about rw. I am planning to make DVD Slide shows from digital photos. Also, what is the best QUALITY program or suite to use (Roxio, ULead, Nero, etc.) KSB |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:50:42 -0400, "KSB" <> wrote:
>Are there any inherent differences in quality between DVD +r or -r? +r/+rw has added protection from data loss that -r/-rw does not have. But +'s tended to cost a bit more. It should be noted if you're making the disc to play on DVD player or other system other than another PC, the mileage will vary. Some DVD players will work fine with R's but not RW's and some works with +'s but not -'s, etc. To check your DVD player, go to www.videohelp.com and search for your DVD player model and see what other users reported. >Same questions about rw. To computers, there is pretty much no quality difference between r's and rw's. RW is simply a format that can be erased and reburned a number of times while R's are write once for permanet format. >I am planning to make DVD Slide shows from digital >photos. Also, what is the best QUALITY program or suite to use (Roxio, >ULead, Nero, etc.) I have not used all the program but I've used ULead for making DVD movies with menu and Nero for plain straight to disc burning with no menu and no authoring. You might also want to check out www.videohelp.com and look for the best guide that you can understand. It will give you an idea what program to use as some guides are written simple enough to earn a place in any For Dummies book. -- To reply, replace digi.mon with phreaker.net Impmon |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Impmon" <> wrote > +r/+rw has added protection from data loss that -r/-rw does not have. Reference? John Howells John Howells |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I am aware of the compatibility issues, or hardware issues, which, in my
case is not a problem. I am more concerned as to any QUALITY difference between + R and -R technologies. "Impmon" <> wrote in message news:... > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:50:42 -0400, "KSB" <> wrote: > >>Are there any inherent differences in quality between DVD +r or -r? > > +r/+rw has added protection from data loss that -r/-rw does not have. > But +'s tended to cost a bit more. > > It should be noted if you're making the disc to play on DVD player or > other system other than another PC, the mileage will vary. Some DVD > players will work fine with R's but not RW's and some works with +'s > but not -'s, etc. To check your DVD player, go to www.videohelp.com > and search for your DVD player model and see what other users > reported. > >>Same questions about rw. > > To computers, there is pretty much no quality difference between r's > and rw's. RW is simply a format that can be erased and reburned a > number of times while R's are write once for permanet format. > >>I am planning to make DVD Slide shows from digital >>photos. Also, what is the best QUALITY program or suite to use (Roxio, >>ULead, Nero, etc.) > > I have not used all the program but I've used ULead for making DVD > movies with menu and Nero for plain straight to disc burning with no > menu and no authoring. You might also want to check out > www.videohelp.com and look for the best guide that you can understand. > It will give you an idea what program to use as some guides are > written simple enough to earn a place in any For Dummies book. > -- > To reply, replace digi.mon with phreaker.net KSB |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"KSB" <> wrote in message news:URsae.16759$... >I am aware of the compatibility issues, or hardware issues, which, in my >case is not a problem. I am more concerned as to any QUALITY difference >between + R and -R technologies. No difference. Just get the one that's compatable with what you want to do. Large Farva |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"KSB" <> wrote in message news:URsae.16759$... >I am aware of the compatibility issues, or hardware issues, which, in my >case is not a problem. I am more concerned as to any QUALITY difference >between + R and -R technologies. > 1. We are dealing with a digital media here, so the 'bits' are either correct or wrong - no shades of grey. It is very different with an analog signal such as vhs. 2. The extra error correction features may make a difference to recovering data from a damaged dvd but ....? Stuart Stuart Miller |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to use Nero to check quality of copied DVD? | Just | DVD Video | 2 | 08-13-2006 11:59 AM |
| North American buying Camcorder in Europe | Skookum | DVD Video | 16 | 06-30-2006 10:51 PM |
| Home vhs quality much better than DVD | Hugh Doherty | DVD Video | 6 | 04-15-2006 03:57 PM |
| Windows media video quality and conversion question | Ray | DVD Video | 2 | 07-02-2005 03:05 AM |
| Philips DVDR75 picture quality problems | Tony Jeffreys | DVD Video | 1 | 10-18-2004 04:21 PM |