Back to the Future DVD booklet

Hello,

I just purchased the 'new low price' BTTF set with the fixed DVD's in
them (no framing issues).

However, it did not have the 6 page booklet that the earlier version
had (which I found out after I bought this set).

Does anyone know of a site where I could download this booklet?

Or would some kind soul be willing to scan theirs?

Thanks,
Nick

ghost@nowhere.com

wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just purchased the 'new low price' BTTF set with the fixed DVD's in
> them (no framing issues).
>
> However, it did not have the 6 page booklet that the earlier version
> had (which I found out after I bought this set).
>
> Does anyone know of a site where I could download this booklet?
>
> Or would some kind soul be willing to scan theirs?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick

I'm sorry I'm new around here, so I'm not familiar with the framing
issues the original release had. Can anyone enlighten me?

-Doc

docdude316

"docdude316" <> wrote

> I'm sorry I'm new around here, so I'm not familiar with the framing
> issues the original release had. Can anyone enlighten me?

Put

"back to the future" dvd replacement

into Google, quoted exactly that way, and the first entry will tell you
everything, with other references to back it up.

John Howells

John Howells

Why did they **** up the DVDS >?>?? They are a big company why do that
to us ???



On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:24:09 -0000, "John Howells"
<> wrote:

>
>"docdude316" <> wrote
>
>> I'm sorry I'm new around here, so I'm not familiar with the framing
>> issues the original release had. Can anyone enlighten me?
>
>Put
>
>"back to the future" dvd replacement
>
>into Google, quoted exactly that way, and the first entry will tell you
>everything, with other references to back it up.
>
>John Howells
>

Paul M

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:54:42 +1100, Paul M wrote:

> Why did they **** up the DVDS >?>?? They are a big company why do that
> to us ???

They didn't do it on purpose. It was a mistake that they later corrected
by sending out replacement discs.

-Jay

Jay G.

How do they make a mistake like that ?


On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:22:32 -0600, "Jay G." <> wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:54:42 +1100, Paul M wrote:
>
>> Why did they **** up the DVDS >?>?? They are a big company why do that
>> to us ???
>
>They didn't do it on purpose. It was a mistake that they later corrected
>by sending out replacement discs.
>
>-Jay

Paul M

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:53:56 +1100, Paul M wrote:
>>They didn't do it on purpose. It was a mistake that they later corrected
>>by sending out replacement discs.
>
> How do they make a mistake like that ?

By not doing it correctly. Please don't top post.

-Jay

Jay G.

Why not ?
"Jay G." <> wrote in message
news:1dhk6e4ougrrm.1jleygppti8rj$... .
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:53:56 +1100, Paul M wrote:
>>>They didn't do it on purpose. It was a mistake that they later corrected
>>>by sending out replacement discs.
>>
>> How do they make a mistake like that ?
>
> By not doing it correctly. Please don't top post.
>
> -Jay

Dr Hackenbush

Dr Hackenbush wrote:

> "Jay G." <> wrote in message
> news:1dhk6e4ougrrm.1jleygppti8rj$... .
>
>>On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:53:56 +1100, Paul M wrote:
>>
>>>>They didn't do it on purpose. It was a mistake that they later corrected
>>>>by sending out replacement discs.
>>>
>>>How do they make a mistake like that ?
>>
>>By not doing it correctly. Please don't top post.
>>
>
> Why not ?
>

Please don't top post.

No. I'm not singling you out.

>Dave: Oh! Now it makes sense to me. Okay! No more top-posting for me!
> Bob: It's annoying because it reverses the normal order of
> conversation. In fact, many people ignore top-posted articles.
>> Dave: What's so wrong with that?
>>> Bob: That's posting your response *before* the article you're
>>> quoting.
>>>> Dave: People keep bugging me about "top-posting." What does that
>>>> mean?
>>>>> A: Top posters.
>>>>>> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Matthew

--
Thermodynamics and/or Golf for dummies: There is a game
You can't win
You can't break even
You can't get out of the game

Matthew L. Martin

I couldnt care less if you were, in fact about as much as i care wether
people top post or not
I get ****ed off about people who moan about top posting, whats the point
who cares

At least i havent got to bother with all the unsnipped crap

"Matthew L. Martin" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Dr Hackenbush wrote:
>
>> "Jay G." <> wrote in message
>> news:1dhk6e4ougrrm.1jleygppti8rj$... .
>>
>>>On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:53:56 +1100, Paul M wrote:
>>>
>>>>>They didn't do it on purpose. It was a mistake that they later
>>>>>corrected
>>>>>by sending out replacement discs.
>>>>
>>>>How do they make a mistake like that ?
>>>
>>>By not doing it correctly. Please don't top post.
>>>
>>
> > Why not ?
>>
>
> Please don't top post.
>
> No. I'm not singling you out.
>
> >Dave: Oh! Now it makes sense to me. Okay! No more top-posting for me!
> > Bob: It's annoying because it reverses the normal order of
> > conversation. In fact, many people ignore top-posted articles.
> >> Dave: What's so wrong with that?
> >>> Bob: That's posting your response *before* the article you're
> >>> quoting.
> >>>> Dave: People keep bugging me about "top-posting." What does that
> >>>> mean?
> >>>>> A: Top posters.
> >>>>>> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
> Matthew
>
> --
> Thermodynamics and/or Golf for dummies: There is a game
> You can't win
> You can't break even
> You can't get out of the game

Dr Hackenbush