Kent Smith wrote:
>>These scenes missing are sufficiantly disruptive to the flow of the
>>movie that I'm prepared to buy another copy of the movie just to get
>>them. I've seen this movie dozens of times on my old warn out VHS
>>copy, so I really notice this poor edit.
>>
>
> No cuts according to DVD Compare:
> http://www.dvdcompare.net/comparisons/film.php?fid=3896
>
> Would that be the 'For Lease' sign? If so, I've never seen a version
> without it.
The text on the 'For Lease' sign is missing from the Region 1 DVD, and
on Laserdisk/VHS versions from 1993.
My R1 copy definitely has a stereo track, but I don't think the movie
originally was. The R1 transfer also isn't very good. Makes deciding
which to watch more difficult.
Thanks,
The Other Guy