![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I have a bunch of digital 8 tapes that I'd like to burn to DVD. What would
be the preferred method for getting this done? Would you create a file on a pc and burn it from there or would I have better luck purchasing DVD recorder and playing back through the TV and capturing it that way? I'm looking for good quality, ease of use and as fast as I can get it done. Any help would be appreciated. Bryan Bryan Berguson |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
In article <>,
"Bryan Berguson" <> writes: > I have a bunch of digital 8 tapes that I'd like to burn to DVD. What would > be the preferred method for getting this done? Would you create a file on a > pc and burn it from there or would I have better luck purchasing DVD > recorder and playing back through the TV and capturing it that way? I'm > looking for good quality, ease of use and as fast as I can get it done. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Bryan The simplest method is to get a DVD recorder with a digital input for Digital-8 and miniDV camcorders like my Toshiba. I also suggest you get one with a hard disk as it is much easier to edit before making the DVD. David E. Bath |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Bryan Berguson" <> wrote...
> I have a bunch of digital 8 tapes that I'd like to burn to DVD. What would > be the preferred method for getting this done? Would you create a file on a > pc and burn it from there No. You would capture in either the AVI or HuffYuv codec, then encode to MPEG-2. I've seen the results of on-the-fly MPEG-2 encoding direct from the capture, but I was unimpressed by all of the motion artifacts. > or would I have better luck purchasing DVD > recorder and playing back through the TV and capturing it that way? That's certainly the easiest way. The DVD recorder will make its own menu, which is very basic but functional, and you have your final product. You have choices of a variety of constant bitrates, where you can fit anywhere from 1 hour to 6 hours (I think that this is the upper limit) on a single DVDR. > I'm looking for good quality, ease of use and as fast as I can get it done. Good quality -- encode to MPEG-2 from a PC capture using variable bitrate. Depending upon your experience, this can be a slow process, because you will also have to author the DVD with an authoring program. Ease of use -- the set top DVD recorder. Plug it in and record. Very fast process. Quality is actually pretty good for a 2-hour or less recording onto a DVDR. > Any help would be appreciated. Go to: http://www.videohelp.com After you have mastered that site, then go to: http://www.doom9.org HTH, -Junior unclejr |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On 6 Oct 2004 17:47:55 -0700, (unclejr) wrote:
>"Bryan Berguson" <> wrote... >> I have a bunch of digital 8 tapes that I'd like to burn to DVD. .... >> or would I have better luck purchasing DVD >> recorder .... >.... You have choices of a variety of constant bitrates Most (at least meny) recorders use varible bit rate (VBR), aiming to fit the selected recording time. > where >you can fit anywhere from 1 hour to 6 hours (I think that this is the >upper limit) on a single DVDR. Some can even store in worse quality up to 8 hours... Bryan doesn't want that anyway. I would stay at 2 hours. >> I'm looking for good quality, ease of use and as fast as I can get it done. Then, go for a recorder with a suitable input for your camera (S-video, or digital?). To make some editing possible, either choose a DVD+RW recorder without a HDD, or a DVD-R with a HDD. Both gives the possibility to trim the recordings (start, end, hide/remove some parts etc.) With the "-R" system you need the HDD to do the editing. With the "+RW" system you need to use +RW discs to have the DVD:s play according to the edits on another DVD player. Also check the editing features on the model you consider as it varies. /Jan Jan B |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
> > The simplest method is to get a DVD recorder with a digital input for > Digital-8 and miniDV camcorders like my Toshiba. I also suggest you > get one with a hard disk as it is much easier to edit before making > the DVD. David, I wondered about this after I posted my first message. Just bypass the TV completely by going from the camera into the recorder. I'm going to check into this further. What model Toshiba do you have? Thanks to all for you suggestions. Bypassing the computer is what I was hoping to do so hopefully that works. Bryan Bryan Berguson |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Jan B wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2004 17:47:55 -0700, (unclejr) wrote: > > >>"Bryan Berguson" <> wrote... >> >>>I have a bunch of digital 8 tapes that I'd like to burn to DVD. > > ... > >>>or would I have better luck purchasing DVD >>>recorder > > ... > >>.... You have choices of a variety of constant bitrates > > > Most (at least meny) recorders use varible bit rate (VBR), aiming to > fit the selected recording time. > > >>where >>you can fit anywhere from 1 hour to 6 hours (I think that this is the >>upper limit) on a single DVDR. > > > Some can even store in worse quality up to 8 hours... Bryan doesn't > want that anyway. I would stay at 2 hours. > > >>>I'm looking for good quality, ease of use and as fast as I can get it done. > > > Then, go for a recorder with a suitable input for your camera > (S-video, or digital?). > > To make some editing possible, either choose a DVD+RW recorder without > a HDD, or a DVD-R with a HDD. > Both gives the possibility to trim the recordings (start, end, > hide/remove some parts etc.) > > With the "-R" system you need the HDD to do the editing. > With the "+RW" system you need to use +RW discs to have the DVD:s play > according to the edits on another DVD player. > Also check the editing features on the model you consider as it > varies. > > /Jan but they are using a single pass manual variable bit rate setting which is in no way nearly as good as two pass variable bit rate encoding via the likes of TMPGenc. but capture, encode, author is a damn site more fiddly. Vincent Formosa |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
In article <>,
"Bryan Berguson" <> writes: > > >> >> The simplest method is to get a DVD recorder with a digital input for >> Digital-8 and miniDV camcorders like my Toshiba. I also suggest you >> get one with a hard disk as it is much easier to edit before making >> the DVD. > > David, > > I wondered about this after I posted my first message. Just bypass the TV > completely by going from the camera into the recorder. I'm going to check > into this further. What model Toshiba do you have? It's an RD XS32. Other manufacturers make similar models with the digital interfaces too. At the time I was shopping it was the least expensive one that had the digital and the hard disk. > Thanks to all for you suggestions. Bypassing the computer is what I was > hoping to do so hopefully that works. It works very well, I've copy about 25 tapes so far and made multiple DVDs from each so far. Most have been family and vacation videos. David E. Bath |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Use analogue copying
trying to figure things out "Bryan Berguson" <> wrote in message news:... > I have a bunch of digital 8 tapes that I'd like to burn to DVD. What would > be the preferred method for getting this done? Would you create a file on a > pc and burn it from there or would I have better luck purchasing DVD > recorder and playing back through the TV and capturing it that way? I'm > looking for good quality, ease of use and as fast as I can get it done. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Bryan > > Lars |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Lars" <> wrote in message news:<FDfbd.2173$>...
> Use analogue copying > trying to figure things out > I can't imagine why you would suggest going analog. I am researching my first DVR for three purposes: 1. Copying family VHS tapes (4 to 20 years old) to DVD. 2. Copying family Digital8 tapes (new to 4 years old) to DVD. 3. Recording TV programs from analog cable. Given the above, I am restricting my options to boxes with both firewire (for dubbing the Digital correction (for best recovering the signals from the old VHS). I was hoping to stay in the ball park of $400. It seems I can satisfy all my criteria but one, with which one depending on my choice of model. Here are units I am considering: 1. The JVC MV1S combination DVD burner and VHS deck. Firewire, TBC, good MPEG encoding, no hard drive, under $400. 2. The Panasonic E100 or E95. No VCR, but has firewire, TBC, and a 120 Gb hard drive. $650. 3. The JVC MV30U, DVD burner, VCR, 160Gb HD, $768. I have ruled out Toshiba because of the reported black level problems. (I am in the US. These don't exist everywhere.) I ruled out Pioneer because of reports that they do a poor job recording poor quality VHS output. Rick Rick Matthews |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Rick Matthews" <> wrote in message news: om... > "Lars" <> wrote in message news:<FDfbd.2173$>... > > Use analogue copying > > trying to figure things out > > > I can't imagine why you would suggest going analog. > > I am researching my first DVR for three purposes: > > 1. Copying family VHS tapes (4 to 20 years old) to DVD. > 2. Copying family Digital8 tapes (new to 4 years old) to DVD. > 3. Recording TV programs from analog cable. > > Given the above, I am restricting my options to boxes with > both firewire (for dubbing the Digital > correction (for best recovering the signals from the old VHS). > I was hoping to stay in the ball park of $400. It > seems I can satisfy all my criteria but one, with which one > depending on my choice of model. Here are units I am > considering: > > 1. The JVC MV1S combination DVD burner and VHS deck. Firewire, > TBC, good MPEG encoding, no hard drive, under $400. > 2. The Panasonic E100 or E95. No VCR, but has firewire, TBC, > and a 120 Gb hard drive. $650. > 3. The JVC MV30U, DVD burner, VCR, 160Gb HD, $768. > > I have ruled out Toshiba because of the reported black level > problems. (I am in the US. These don't exist everywhere.) > > I ruled out Pioneer because of reports that they do a poor > job recording poor quality VHS output. > > Rick Any device that converts analog video to digital video does a TBC function, the differences in performance is how good a job they do at deriving sync information from the analog video signal. Analog video tape recordings suffer from drop-outs and sync compression and when they have been copied several times these problems are magnified greatly. Unfortunately few product reviews even know about these problems, so your best bet is to get a poor quality VHS tape and see if you can try it with different brands of DVD recorders to find out which ones have the better TBC functions. I use a Sony DV encoder and sometimes use an external TBC to fix really bad tapes that the Sony will not handle well. I then use my computer to clean up the video signal before I encode it into mpeg2 for DVD authoring. I have run tests using the same high quality video capture to make a DVD disk in my computer with software and also make a DVD using a friends Philips DVD recorder, I was trying to confirm whether a real time one pass hardware mpeg encoder was as good as a multiple pass software encoder. The answer was the hardware encoder in the Philips DVD recorder was OK, but not nearly as good as the software method, but it took me about 1 year to learn how to do the best DVD encoding from analog video sources, and the stand alone DVD recorders are definitely easier and faster to use. Mike T Mike T |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Digital Album Master - Make High Resolution Slideshow For TV | jerryliang | Software | 0 | 07-17-2009 03:16 AM |
| HD DVD requires Digital Imprimatur to authorise playback. | Allan | DVD Video | 0 | 07-25-2005 06:38 AM |
| Analog formats (tape, LaserDisc, vinyl et al.) VS Digital (CD, DVD, regardless...) | Mook23 | DVD Video | 28 | 04-22-2005 06:12 AM |
| Criterion Goes Classic With Digital Vision DVNR. | Allan | DVD Video | 2 | 04-18-2005 07:30 AM |
| Digital DIGEST - LIVE UPDATE Issue 38 | Ablang | DVD Video | 0 | 11-09-2003 01:31 AM |