BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT

BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT

"the nation must be prepared to conduct a draft"

--Lewis C. Brodsky, director of public and congressional affairs with the
Selective Service System

Many people have been wondering if our President has secret plans to
reinstate the draft. This website will provide absolute proof that Bush is
making plans to reinstate the draft by the middle of 2005.

In the last few months Bush has launched a recruiting drive for people to
work on the draft boards around the country, the DefendAmerica government
site posted an advert looking for volunteers, but when someone brought this
to the attention of the press it was promptly removed, fueling rumours about
the possibility of a draft.

There are also CURRENTLY bills in the Senate and in the house that, if
passed, will make military service a requirement for all men, women
(including college students) between the age of 18 and 25.

http://www.bushdraft.com/proof.html

NO WMD. NO direct ties with Al Qaeda and no ties whatsoever with 9-11.
Terrorism is on the increase. 10,000-20,000 Iraqi civilians brutally killed.
Over 1,000 US soldiers killed.

The US uses 1/4 of the world's oil. And Iraq is still the second largest
known oil reserve in the world.

1: FREEDOM!?

see: http://www.zmag.org/CrisesCurEvts/interventions.htm. Of all the
hundreds of interventions most were conceived with the pretext of installing
"freedom". Many in fact installed brutal dictators, and in the cane of such
countries as Guatemala, democratically elected governments were overthrown.

Now a Baathist thug is installed by the US with nebulous "elections" on the
horizon. Most polls (democracy in action?) show a vast majority wish the US
out now and do not believe that they were "liberated". Indeed most
occupations (mostly French and British) within the Mid East in the last 150
years were justified with such false pretexts as "freedom" or
"protecting our citizens".

The call of "Freedom" rings hollow with the Bush administration whose
cabinet
could clearly care less for "freedom" in the past. "Rumsfeld, as Ronald
Reagan's special envoy to the Middle East,visited Iraq in 1983 and 1984 to
establish firmer relations with Saddam (at the same time the administration
was "criticizing" Iraq for using chemical weapons). Powell was Bush I's
national security adviser from December, 1987, to January, 1989, and a few
months later became chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.Cheney was Bush
I's defense secretary. Thus, Powell and Cheney were in top decision-making
positions for the period of Saddam's worst atrocities, the massacre and
gassing of the Kurds in 1988 and the crushing of the Shiite rebellion in
1991 that might have overthrown him.



http://www.punkvoter.com/

Jas

"Jas" <> wrote
in message news:ci0795$9t6$...

> BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT


So close the door.

Peace,
Mark

--
~~~~~~~~GOT USENET?~~~~~~~~~

USENET is the *REAL* Internet.........>
The WWW is to the Internet, what the
Monkees were to Rock & Roll............>
Fluff and bubblegum...........................>
Flashy uselessness.............................>
Bells & whistles...................................>
Eye candy..........................................>
Snake oil............................................>
Tripe............................................. ......>

~~~~~~~~~~BYE NOW!~~~~~~~~~~

Mark {AntiParty\)

"Jas" <> wrote in message
news:ci0795$9t6$...
> BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT


Well.... DUH!

Bush has already proclaimed that he is a Wartime President. Without a
draft, Bush won't be able to maintain the occupation in Iraq, let alone
invade Syria and Iran.

Of course, all of this will take place after the November election,
which Bush will probably win by a landslide.

There are three things soaring right now: casualties in Iraq; the
deficit; Bush's approval rating.

Get over it.

One-Shot Scot

special features on the "Bush will likely install a draft" DVD include:

An "original" memo from Bush's commanding officer in the National Guard
saying he isn't worthy to be President (certificate of authenticity
signed by Dan Rather).

Audio commentary by Bob Villa whom Bush will likely hire to install the
draft.

XXX parody "The Shaft Will likely Install Into Bush"







Jas wrote:
>
> BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT
>
> "the nation must be prepared to conduct a draft"
>
> --Lewis C. Brodsky, director of public and congressional affairs with the
> Selective Service System
>
> Many people have been wondering if our President has secret plans to
> reinstate the draft. This website will provide absolute proof that Bush is
> making plans to reinstate the draft by the middle of 2005.
>
> In the last few months Bush has launched a recruiting drive for people to
> work on the draft boards around the country, the DefendAmerica government
> site posted an advert looking for volunteers, but when someone brought this
> to the attention of the press it was promptly removed, fueling rumours about
> the possibility of a draft.
>
> There are also CURRENTLY bills in the Senate and in the house that, if
> passed, will make military service a requirement for all men, women
> (including college students) between the age of 18 and 25.
>
> http://www.bushdraft.com/proof.html
>
> NO WMD. NO direct ties with Al Qaeda and no ties whatsoever with 9-11.
> Terrorism is on the increase. 10,000-20,000 Iraqi civilians brutally killed.
> Over 1,000 US soldiers killed.
>
> The US uses 1/4 of the world's oil. And Iraq is still the second largest
> known oil reserve in the world.
>
> 1: FREEDOM!?
>
> see: http://www.zmag.org/CrisesCurEvts/interventions.htm. Of all the
> hundreds of interventions most were conceived with the pretext of installing
> "freedom". Many in fact installed brutal dictators, and in the cane of such
> countries as Guatemala, democratically elected governments were overthrown.
>
> Now a Baathist thug is installed by the US with nebulous "elections" on the
> horizon. Most polls (democracy in action?) show a vast majority wish the US
> out now and do not believe that they were "liberated". Indeed most
> occupations (mostly French and British) within the Mid East in the last 150
> years were justified with such false pretexts as "freedom" or
> "protecting our citizens".
>
> The call of "Freedom" rings hollow with the Bush administration whose
> cabinet
> could clearly care less for "freedom" in the past. "Rumsfeld, as Ronald
> Reagan's special envoy to the Middle East,visited Iraq in 1983 and 1984 to
> establish firmer relations with Saddam (at the same time the administration
> was "criticizing" Iraq for using chemical weapons). Powell was Bush I's
> national security adviser from December, 1987, to January, 1989, and a few
> months later became chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.Cheney was Bush
> I's defense secretary. Thus, Powell and Cheney were in top decision-making
> positions for the period of Saddam's worst atrocities, the massacre and
> gassing of the Kurds in 1988 and the crushing of the Shiite rebellion in
> 1991 that might have overthrown him.
>
> http://www.punkvoter.com/

Michael Rogers

Jas wrote:
> BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT
>
> "the nation must be prepared to conduct a draft"
>

http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/...atory.military

The draft is being pushed by our American-African congress ****twits.
Their main point in wanting to push the draft is to draft more rich
white people.

Digital Dude

"One-Shot Scot" <> wrote in message
newsvmdnUV7i7zmIt7cRVn-...
> "Jas" <> wrote in message
> news:ci0795$9t6$...
> > BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT
>
>
> Well.... DUH!
>
> Bush has already proclaimed that he is a Wartime President. Without a
> draft, Bush won't be able to maintain the occupation in Iraq, let alone
> invade Syria and Iran.
>
> Of course, all of this will take place after the November election,
> which Bush will probably win by a landslide.
>
> There are three things soaring right now: casualties in Iraq; the
> deficit; Bush's approval rating.
>
> Get over it.

Listen, we can all do something about it -though no guarantee that it will
work...but you can guarantee that it will not if you simply lay back and
cover your head.


>
>
>

Jasmine

"Digital Dude" <> wrote in message
news:%SQ0d.12305$ om...
> Jas wrote:
> > BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT
> >
> > "the nation must be prepared to conduct a draft"
> >
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/...atory.military
>
> The draft is being pushed by our American-African congress ****twits.
> Their main point in wanting to push the draft is to

draft more rich
> white people.

No rich white people are currently being drafted you nut! Stop this war, get
rid of Bush, and you can relax without this racist rubbish!

Jasmine

"Mark {AntiParty)" <> wrote in message
news:mjO0d.23466$ ink.net...
>
> "Jas" <> wrote
> in message news:ci0795$9t6$...
>
> > BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT


>
> So close the door.
>
> Peace,
> Mark

Yeah Mark,

Partisan_Politics does really suck, so don't do anything. ALL politics is
partisan; this is the definition of politics - different points of view are
in effect ...and yes it does make a difference. Or maybe you have a better
idea...and maybe we will see you on the Iraqi front.

NO WMD. NO direct ties with Al Qaeda and no ties whatsoever with 9-11.
Terrorism is on the increase. 10,000-20,000 Iraqi civilians brutally killed.
Over 1,000 US soldiers killed.

The US uses 1/4 of the world's oil. And Iraq is still the second largest
known oil reserve in the world.

1: FREEDOM!?

see: http://www.zmag.org/CrisesCurEvts/interventions.htm. Of all the
hundreds of interventions most were conceived with the pretext of installing
"freedom". Many in fact installed brutal dictators, and in the cane of such
countries as Guatemala, democratically elected governments were overthrown.

Now a Baathist thug is installed by the US with nebulous "elections" on the
horizon. Most polls (democracy in action?) show a vast majority wish the US
out now and do not believe that they were "liberated". Indeed most
occupations (mostly French and British) within the Mid East in the last 150
years were justified with such false pretexts as "freedom" or
"protecting our citizens".

The call of "Freedom" rings hollow with the Bush administration whose
cabinet
could clearly care less for "freedom" in the past. "Rumsfeld, as Ronald
Reagan's special envoy to the Middle East,visited Iraq in 1983 and 1984 to
establish firmer relations with Saddam (at the same time the administration
was "criticizing" Iraq for using chemical weapons). Powell was Bush I's
national security adviser from December, 1987, to January, 1989, and a few
months later became chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.Cheney was Bush
I's defense secretary. Thus, Powell and Cheney were in top decision-making
positions for the period of Saddam's worst atrocities, the massacre and
gassing of the Kurds in 1988 and the crushing of the Shiite rebellion in
1991 that might have overthrown him.



>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~GOT USENET?~~~~~~~~~
>
> USENET is the *REAL* Internet.........>
> The WWW is to the Internet, what the
> Monkees were to Rock & Roll............>
> Fluff and bubblegum...........................>
> Flashy uselessness.............................>
> Bells & whistles...................................>
> Eye candy..........................................>
> Snake oil............................................>
> Tripe............................................. ......>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~BYE NOW!~~~~~~~~~~
>
>

Jasmine

"Jasmine" <> wrote in message
news:ci0m9l$mt6$...
>
> "Mark {AntiParty)" <> wrote in message
> news:mjO0d.23466$ ink.net...
>>
>> "Jas" <> wrote
>> in message news:ci0795$9t6$...
>>
>> > BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT
>
>
>>
>> So close the door.
>>
>> Peace,
>> Mark
>
> Yeah Mark,
>
> Partisan_Politics does really suck, so don't do anything. ALL politics is
> partisan; this is the definition of politics - different points of view
> are
> in effect ...and yes it does make a difference. Or maybe you have a better
> idea...and maybe we will see you on the Iraqi front.
>
> NO WMD. NO direct ties with Al Qaeda and no ties whatsoever with 9-11.
> Terrorism is on the increase. 10,000-20,000 Iraqi civilians brutally
> killed.
> Over 1,000 US soldiers killed.
>
> The US uses 1/4 of the world's oil. And Iraq is still the second largest
> known oil reserve in the world.
>
> 1: FREEDOM!?
>
> see: http://www.zmag.org/CrisesCurEvts/interventions.htm. Of all the
> hundreds of interventions most were conceived with the pretext of
> installing
> "freedom". Many in fact installed brutal dictators, and in the cane of
> such
> countries as Guatemala, democratically elected governments were
> overthrown.
>
> Now a Baathist thug is installed by the US with nebulous "elections" on
> the
> horizon. Most polls (democracy in action?) show a vast majority wish the
> US
> out now and do not believe that they were "liberated". Indeed most
> occupations (mostly French and British) within the Mid East in the last
> 150
> years were justified with such false pretexts as "freedom" or
> "protecting our citizens".
>
> The call of "Freedom" rings hollow with the Bush administration whose
> cabinet
> could clearly care less for "freedom" in the past. "Rumsfeld, as Ronald
> Reagan's special envoy to the Middle East,visited Iraq in 1983 and 1984 to
> establish firmer relations with Saddam (at the same time the
> administration
> was "criticizing" Iraq for using chemical weapons). Powell was Bush I's
> national security adviser from December, 1987, to January, 1989, and a few
> months later became chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.Cheney was Bush
> I's defense secretary. Thus, Powell and Cheney were in top decision-making
> positions for the period of Saddam's worst atrocities, the massacre and
> gassing of the Kurds in 1988 and the crushing of the Shiite rebellion in
> 1991 that might have overthrown him.


This is so full of propaganda and wishful, slanted thinking you don't
pursuade at all. In fact, you are funny.

luminos

"Jasmine" <> wrote in message
news:ci0m9l$mt6$...
>
> "Mark {AntiParty)" <> wrote in message
> news:mjO0d.23466$ ink.net...
> >
> > "Jas" <> wrote
> > in message news:ci0795$9t6$...
> >
> > > BUSH WILL LIKELY INSTALL A DRAFT
>
>
> >
> > So close the door.
> >
> > Peace,
> > Mark
>
> Yeah Mark,
>
> Partisan_Politics does really suck, so don't do anything.
> ALL politics is <Snip mega-rant>


Holy Smokes!

That's the last time I reply to a cross posted thread.
(well, actually, *this* is the last time.
All this, and all I said was: "So close the door."


Peace,
Mark

--
Disclaimer:
---------------------------
I say what I say. Take it or leave it.
If you require proof that there are stars in
the sky on a cloudy night, that is your problem.
If you want proof of something I said, find it yourself.

Mark {AntiParty\)