«

Is the Mel Brooks commentary on the recent Blazing Saddles reissue
new, or is it the same as on the first release (which was NOT
"scene-specific").

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Mr. Mike wrote:

> Is the Mel Brooks commentary on the recent Blazing Saddles reissue
> new, or is it the same as on the first release (which was NOT
> "scene-specific").

Reportedly it's the same.

swac

> > Is the Mel Brooks commentary on the recent Blazing Saddles reissue
> > new, or is it the same as on the first release (which was NOT
> > "scene-specific").
>
> Reportedly it's the same.
>
> swac
>

It is the same.

"Mr. Mike" <mr-> wrote in alt.video.dvd:
>Is the Mel Brooks commentary on the recent Blazing Saddles reissue
>new, or is it the same as on the first release (which was NOT
>"scene-specific").

What, you think the answer has changed in the last few days?

> http://groups.google.com/groups?thre....bay.webtv.net

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
"If there's one thing I know, it's men. I ought to: it's
been my life work." -- Marie Dressler, in /Dinner at Eight/

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:19:49 -0400, Stan Brown <>
wrote:

>What, you think the answer has changed in the last few days?

Since I never read the previous discussion, I guess I didn't know, eh?

"Mr. Mike" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:19:49 -0400, Stan Brown
<>
> wrote:
>
> >What, you think the answer has changed in the last few days?
>
> Since I never read the previous discussion, I guess I didn't know, eh?
>

Since you cant be bothered to read back a few days or even just a few
hundred posts to see if the question had already been asked and answered,
why should anyone bother to answer again?

> Since you cant be bothered to read back a few days or even just a few
> hundred posts to see if the question had already been asked and answered,
> why should anyone bother to answer again?
>
>

So file a bloody lawsuit if it ticks you off so much...or lay off of the
caffeine for awhile.

"Biz" <> wrote in alt.video.dvd:
>"Mr. Mike" <> wrote in message
>news:.. .
>> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:19:49 -0400, Stan Brown
><>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >What, you think the answer has changed in the last few days?
>>
>> Since I never read the previous discussion, I guess I didn't know, eh?
>>
>
>Since you cant be bothered to read back a few days or even just a few
>hundred posts to see if the question had already been asked and answered,
>why should anyone bother to answer again?

The problem is, there are plenty of people around who reward that
kind of behavior by posting again.

"Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, you
feed him for a lifetime." -- old saying

"Give me what I want, on a silver platter, and give it to me now,
because I can't be bothered to lift a finger for myself." -- current
practice

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
"If there's one thing I know, it's men. I ought to: it's
been my life work." -- Marie Dressler, in /Dinner at Eight/

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Stan Brown wrote:

> "Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, you
> feed him for a lifetime." -- old saying

"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire, and
he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

swac

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:07:20 GMT, "Biz" <> wrote:

>Since you cant be bothered to read back a few days or even just a few
>hundred posts to see if the question had already been asked and answered,
>why should anyone bother to answer again?

Since my original question was answered, as far as I am concerned, this
discussion is closed.