Report BI violations by DVD Verdict and Genre Online

I have now reported these two spammers for exceeding the
BI and I encourage others to do the same.

Both Mike Jackson aka DVD Verdict aka AM
and Mark A. Rivera aka GENRE ONLINE.NET aka ospam
are guilty of exceeding the limits imposed by the Breidbart Index (BI).

This is NOT a commercial group, and yet these spammers post
messages several times a week that have no purpose other than
to drive traffic to their web sites. I've reported them for that and
asked
that others do the same. They should have been stopped by now, if for
no other reason than the fact that they have violated the terms of
the Amazon Associate agreement.

However they are still posting. Perhaps their service providers are
just slow or they have been misled by the few vocal supporters that
the spammers have in this group. Whatever the reasons for the
inaction so far, complaints about BI violations will get some action.
And the more people who file complaints the better.

A BI of 20 or greater over a 45 day period qualifies
as spam. When calculating the BI, posts consisting of little more
than links to a DVD review site are an example of
"substantively identical articles" that are
"advertising the same service" i.e. a DVD review web site.

See:
http://www.stopspam.org/usenet/mmf/breidbart.html
"These are examples of substantively identical articles:
....advertising the same service"

Here are the abuse addresses:

Mike Jackson aka DVD Verdict aka AM



Amazon ID: dvdverdict

Mark A. Rivera aka GENRE ONLINE.NET aka ospam




Amazon ID: genreonlinene

Here is a list of their message ID's and the dates they were posted
that prove both individuals have exceeded the BI:

-----------------------------
Mark A. Rivera aka
ospam aka Genreonline
posted a total of 36 substantially identical
messages within a 45 day period

He posted 17 substantially identical messages
to alt.video.dvd:
<> 6/15
<> 6/13
<> 6/11
<> 6/8
<> 6/8
<> 6/7
<> 6/7
<> 6/5
<> 6/3
<> 5/29
<> 5/29
<> 5/28
<> 5/27
<> 5/24
<> 5/22
<> 5/11
<> 5/10
<> 5/7
<> 5/6
<> 5/4

And ospam aka Genreonline posted
19 substantially identical messages to rec.video.dvd.titles:
<> 6/14
<> 6/11
<> 6/9
<> 6/7
<> 6/7
<> 6/5
<> 6/4
<> 6/3
<> 5/29
<> 5/28
<> 5/28
<> 5/25
<> 5/22
<> 5/11
<> 5/10
<> 5/8
<> 5/7
<> 5/6
<> 5/4

--------------------------------
Mike Jackson aka
AM aka DVD Verdict posted
to alt.video.dvd 33 substantially identical messages
within a 45 day period:
<> 6/16
<> 6/15
<> 6/14
<> 6/11
<> 6/10
<> 6/9
<> 6/8
<> 6/7
<> 6/4
<> 6/2
<> 6/1
<> 5/31
<> 5/28
<> 5/27
<> 5/26
<> 5/25
<> 5/24
<> 5/21
<> 5/20
<> 5/19
<> 5/18
<> 5/17
<> 5/15
<> 5/14
<> 5/13
<> 5/12
<> 5/11
<> 5/10
<> 5/7
<> 5/6
<> 5/5
<> 5/4
<> 5/3

--
Buford T. Justice
The alt.video.dvd faq is located at:
http://www.geocities.com/altvideodvd/

FAQmeister

FAQmeister wrote:
> I have now reported these two spammers for exceeding the
> BI and I encourage others to do the same.

I guess that for some people, the prospect of gaining a life is simply to
frightening to contemplate. They might actually be presented with the
opportunity to do something that actually makes a difference.

Mike

Mike Kohary

"FAQmeister" <> wrote in message
news:caqatf$ssb$...
> I have now reported these two spammers for exceeding the
> BI and I encourage others to do the same.
>
> Both Mike Jackson aka DVD Verdict aka AM
> and Mark A. Rivera aka GENRE ONLINE.NET aka ospam
> are guilty of exceeding the limits imposed by the Breidbart Index (BI).
>


You have like way too much time on your hands....might I suggest a hobby of
sorts?

TSKO

FAQmeister wrote:
>
> I have now reported these two spammers for exceeding the
> BI and I encourage others to do the same.
>
> Both Mike Jackson aka DVD Verdict aka AM
> and Mark A. Rivera aka GENRE ONLINE.NET aka ospam
> are guilty of exceeding the limits imposed by the Breidbart Index (BI).
> <snip...>

For a while I thought this was a spoof by Waterperson77, but looks like
this is the real thing .

> However they are still posting. Perhaps their service providers are
> just slow or they have been misled by the few vocal supporters that
> the spammers have in this group.

Or perhaps nobody cares as much as you do about this crusade. If you're
going to put all this effort into something, why not try something more
productive? Motivation seems to be one of your good traits; a more
meaningful cause might gain something from your support...

JF

JFR

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 21:45:59 GMT, "TSKO" <> wrote:

>
>"FAQmeister" <> wrote in message
>news:caqatf$ssb$...
>> I have now reported these two spammers for exceeding the
>> BI and I encourage others to do the same.
>>
>> Both Mike Jackson aka DVD Verdict aka AM
>> and Mark A. Rivera aka GENRE ONLINE.NET aka ospam
>> are guilty of exceeding the limits imposed by the Breidbart Index (BI).
>>
>
>
>You have like way too much time on your hands....might I suggest a hobby of
>sorts?
>
If he is going to gripe about people spamming, I wish he would stop
doing it himself. Report the heck out of them if you wish, but don't
tell us about it.

Ken

Ken Cobb

"FAQmeister" <> wrote in message
news:caqatf$ssb$...
> I have now reported these two spammers for exceeding the
> BI and I encourage others to do the same.

I guess you must not have accomplished all that much if you have to keep
hammering away eh FalseFAQ?

> Both Mike Jackson aka DVD Verdict aka AM
> and Mark A. Rivera aka GENRE ONLINE.NET aka ospam
> are guilty of exceeding the limits imposed by the Breidbart Index (BI).

Just as you're guilty of attempting to assume that you have any right to
author a FAQ and then pass that FAQ off as official in your complaints.
This is the true indication of your character, or lack thereof. You use
fraud to get your way.

> This is NOT a commercial group, and yet these spammers post
> messages several times a week that have no purpose other than
> to drive traffic to their web sites. I've reported them for that and
> asked
> that others do the same. They should have been stopped by now, if for
> no other reason than the fact that they have violated the terms of
> the Amazon Associate agreement.

FalseFAQ, you're noise not signal.

> However they are still posting. Perhaps their service providers are
> just slow or they have been misled by the few vocal supporters that
> the spammers have in this group.

Pity that you care so little for your crusade that you're not able to step
up. But that would require true conviction, something cowards simply do not
have. You have emails and a Google history, I have phone calls and YOUR
Google history.

> Whatever the reasons for the
> inaction so far, complaints about BI violations will get some action.
> And the more people who file complaints the better.

You'll also find that people that have already been pointed out to be kooks
will find their emails bitbinned. Ask someone that has worked many years in
hosting what they do with emails from known kooks.

> A BI of 20 or greater over a 45 day period qualifies
> as spam. When calculating the BI, posts consisting of little more
> than links to a DVD review site are an example of
> "substantively identical articles" that are
> "advertising the same service" i.e. a DVD review web site.
>
> See:
> http://www.stopspam.org/usenet/mmf/breidbart.html
> "These are examples of substantively identical articles:
> ...advertising the same service"
>
> Here are the abuse addresses:
>
> Mike Jackson aka DVD Verdict aka AM


>
>
>

Thanks, sent them more emails referencing my previous phone calls.

> Amazon ID: dvdverdict
>
> Mark A. Rivera aka GENRE ONLINE.NET aka ospam


>
>
>
>
> Amazon ID: genreonlinene

Thanks again!

> Here is a list of their message ID's and the dates they were posted
> that prove both individuals have exceeded the BI:

Here is a list of positive contributions that FalseFAQ has made prior to his
crusade taking wing...

....crickets...

Well, there ya go.

> --
> Buford T. Justice
> The alt.video.dvd faq is located at:
> http://www.geocities.com/altvideodvd/

No it's not. Pushing this false FAQ is one of the reasons your complaints
on NOT BEING TAKEN SERIOUSLY by those that matter, and to further your
education, those that matter are the ones that can turn accounts off.
You're a fraud FalseFAQ and as long as you continue IN THIS MANNER I will
take much pleasure in making sure that you're never taken seriously by
anyone that matters.

I don't care for spam. I don't care for link spammers, on topic or not. I
spend much of my day dealing with idiots that think the net exists for them,
FalseFAQ being a prime example of that type. The one thing I care for less
is some moron coming into a group, slapping on a 25 cent sheriff's badge and
whistling the theme to Gunsmoke as they patrol "their" streets, corrupting
the very streets they claim to protect.

Your methods are why I will continue to fight you and by no strange
coincidence, why you will lose.

JD

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:28:24 -0500, "JD" <> wrote:

>snip

This used to be such a good, helpful group. I don't see the spam.
Why troll and create problems?

--
The Day PP was speechless, April 20, 2004.

"This may actually be the strangest idea ever in abp. I think you got
me, WC--I'm speechless. A guy in a female road runner suit... that's
just not right."

Wild Coyote
wild_coyote<AT>whoppermail.com

Wild Coyote

"Wild Coyote" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:28:24 -0500, "JD" <> wrote:
>
> >snip
>
> This used to be such a good, helpful group. I don't see the spam.
> Why troll and create problems?

If this comment was aimed at me then I would suggest that you take a reading
comprehension course.


> --
> The Day PP was speechless, April 20, 2004.
>
> "This may actually be the strangest idea ever in abp. I think you got
> me, WC--I'm speechless. A guy in a female road runner suit... that's
> just not right."
>
> Wild Coyote
> wild_coyote<AT>whoppermail.com

JD

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 18:00:20 -0500, "JD" <> wrote:

>
>"Wild Coyote" <> wrote in message
>news:.. .
>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:28:24 -0500, "JD" <> wrote:
>>
>> >snip
>>
>> This used to be such a good, helpful group. I don't see the spam.
>> Why troll and create problems?
>
>If this comment was aimed at me then I would suggest that you take a reading
>comprehension course.
>
>
>> --
>> The Day PP was speechless, April 20, 2004.
>>
>> "This may actually be the strangest idea ever in abp. I think you got
>> me, WC--I'm speechless. A guy in a female road runner suit... that's
>> just not right."
>>
>> Wild Coyote
>> wild_coyote<AT>whoppermail.com
>

No, not at all. Sorry, when I reread what I wrote it sounded like
that. It was meant for the original poster. That is what trolls do
to a good group.

--
The Day PP was speechless, April 20, 2004.

"This may actually be the strangest idea ever in abp. I think you got
me, WC--I'm speechless. A guy in a female road runner suit... that's
just not right."

Wild Coyote
wild_coyote<AT>whoppermail.com

Wild Coyote

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:33:14 -0700, "FAQmeister"
<> wrote:

>I have now reported these two spammers for exceeding the
>BI and I encourage others to do the same.
>
>Both Mike Jackson aka DVD Verdict aka AM
>and Mark A. Rivera aka GENRE ONLINE.NET aka ospam
>are guilty of exceeding the limits imposed by the Breidbart Index (BI).
>

Your Mother and your Sister are exceeding the Blowjob Index. And I am
starting to suspect you are also. Get a hobby ya ****ing goof.

john33907@comcast.net