![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
DVD Video - Newbie: Cabling Problems & Progessive (Interlace Or Progressive) Scan Questions, Please |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hi,
First, thanks to everyone for all the previous help in setting up my first DVD player. Really appreciate it. Just bought a Panasonic DVD-S47, which I'm feeding into a Panasonic TV. Don't know how they expect mere mortals to figure out all the interconnections, and bells and whistles. I'm a retired engineer, and pretty good with differential equations and celestial mchanics, but this stuff is beyond me. Really a poor manual, IMHO. Anyway: I first got it working with the 3 cable video composite input. Pix looked pretty good to me. Then it was suggested that it would look much, much, better, with the 5 cable video component hookup. I did it, and yes, it does look better, but not "incredibly better". So I looked thru the book, and found where it described, somewhat, the "Video Output Mode: 4801, interlaced, or 480P, progressive. It was set to 4801, so I re-set it to 480P, the progressive mode. Then my problems started: First, the TV picture became totally distorted (with or without a CD playing), as if it lost sync. Couldn't get back to any DVD player menus to change to the original setting, as the pix on the TV was too distorted to read. Tried turning DVD player on and off, re-plugging the power cord, etc.; nothing worked. Finally was able to get two semi-distorted displays (sort of split in the middle) to show up with the menus, and was able to get it back to the original 4801. So, let me please ask: a. In a very subjective sense, how "much" better should I really expect the component setup to be ? b. What is the difference between 4801 and 480P ? Truly don't understand this at all. Does it effect the pix quality ? Are some CD's one, and others the other ? If so, how do I know (and switch the DVDplayer) ? **What setting should it (typically) be on for me ? c. Why did my picture go crazy when I put it on the progressive setting ? d. Why couldn't I get any kind of menu back ? How do I do get back to a menu in the future, if it happens again? Is there a default switch, or something similar, somewhere, to revert back to all the default settings ? Much thanks, Bob Robert11 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Robert11 wrote:
> Anyway: I first got it working with the 3 cable video composite input. > Pix looked pretty good to me. > Then it was suggested that it would look much, much, better, with the 5 > cable video component hookup. > I did it, and yes, it does look better, but not "incredibly better". > Your tv needs calibrating then. > So I looked thru the book, and found where it described, somewhat, the > "Video Output Mode: 4801, interlaced, or 480P, progressive. > > It was set to 4801, so I re-set it to 480P, the progressive mode. > > Then my problems started: > > First, the TV picture became totally distorted (with or without a CD > playing), as if it lost sync. > Couldn't get back to any DVD player menus to change to the original setting, > as the pix on the > TV was too distorted to read. > Tsk, tsk, tsk. Did you check to make sure your tv *had* progressive capability? This is a feature of digital tv (no, I don't mean digital cable, I mean the ATSC high-definition compatible tvs). > a. In a very subjective sense, how "much" better should I really expect the > component setup to be ? > Head and shoulders above composite. Buy a copy of Digital Video Essentials, it's about 17 bucks on www.deepdiscountdvd.com This is a DVD full of specially designed test patterns and even a tri-color gel insert that will help you properly calibrate your tv, because out of the box the picture settings are all out of whack. It even talks you through everything. If you listen to nothing else I say, buy this tool. It's not some stupid gadget for people with too much money. I use it at least twice a year, as tv settings will slowly drift. > b. What is the difference between 4801 and 480P ? Truly don't understand > this at all. Does it effect the pix > quality ? > Sure does. An interlaced picture is what all NTSC analog tvs have been providing since the very beginning, and it is a picture in which every other scanline is drawn in one pass (or "field"), and then then....you know what? Let me direct you to a page that can spell all this out with some nifty graphics: > http://www.cs.tut.fi/~leopold/Ld/FilmToVideo/ Read that, and it will answer 90% of the questions you will ever have about this. > Are some CD's one, and others the other ? If so, how do I know (and > switch the DVDplayer) ? > Whoa, slow down. A CD is a compact disk that holds a fraction of what a DVD can hold. My DVD player has a switch on the back to change from interlaced to progressive, thus if you cause any screw-ups you can get the setting back to normal without a picture. > Is there a default switch, or something similar, somewhere, to revert > back to all the default settings ? > See if there is a switch on the back. -- "Hey, I bet people will buy my ugly shirts if I put my name on them." --Tommy Hilfiger Grand Inquisitor http://www.dvdprofiler.com/mycollection.asp?alias=Oost Grand Inquisitor |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| interlaced vs progressive scan question | wdoe999@yahoo.com | DVD Video | 9 | 11-18-2006 10:59 PM |
| Progressive Scan issue | polecat | General Help Related Topics | 1 | 08-28-2006 02:11 PM |
| DVD Player Progressive Scan Quest's | Robert11 | DVD Video | 3 | 05-30-2004 09:43 PM |
| Progressive Scan | Tim Hopkins | DVD Video | 2 | 04-30-2004 04:20 AM |
| Progressive scan dvd's on a non-progressive scan tv | jack lift | DVD Video | 7 | 12-09-2003 06:01 PM |