More Star Wars

I dont know if anyone read digitalbits today....but the "Well...Here we Go
again: Star Wars on DVD" article states that even though we are getting the
SE movies.....they may be still a bit different from what we saw back in
'97....George still might of tweaked them a bit. I know, I know, they are
not the movies we all grew up with...but if that is what we are going to
get...hopefully certain things were fixed (Who shoots first?)

Any thoughts?

TSKO

TSKO wrote on [Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:53:46 GMT]:
> I dont know if anyone read digitalbits today....but the "Well...Here we Go
> again: Star Wars on DVD" article states that even though we are getting the
> SE movies.....they may be still a bit different from what we saw back in
> '97....George still might of tweaked them a bit. I know, I know, they are
> not the movies we all grew up with...but if that is what we are going to
> get...hopefully certain things were fixed (Who shoots first?)
>
> Any thoughts?
>

I'm hoping the rumours of adding Padme and young Obi Wan are unfounded.
Oh, and younger Anakin

Justin

On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:53:46 GMT, "TSKO" <> wrote:

>I dont know if anyone read digitalbits today....but the "Well...Here we Go
>again: Star Wars on DVD" article states that even though we are getting the
>SE movies.....they may be still a bit different from what we saw back in
>'97....George still might of tweaked them a bit. I know, I know, they are
>not the movies we all grew up with...but if that is what we are going to
>get...hopefully certain things were fixed (Who shoots first?)
>
>Any thoughts?
>


<excerpt from thedigitalbits.com>
"This is just my own personal preference, but if Lucas would just let
Han shoot first again, fix that awful Jabba CGI, and put glowing
blades on the sabers in the Ben/Vader duel, I'm fine with everything
else in the SEs. I don't know specifically that any of that is
actually going to happen, but I'm hopeful."

Whether you're a casual or intense SW fan, I think that sums up what
most of us would like out of these releases. All we can do is wait
and see, although I will say that I do plan to get a set regardless.
regards,


=====================

=====================

fredman

At the risk of getting flamed, I must admit that Greedo shooting first doesn't
bother me too much -- first time I saw it, it was over so fast I wasn't sure
what had even happened -- but that stupid robot that plonks the other one over
the head in Mos Eisley has GOT to go.

JONA99

On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:53:46 GMT, "TSKO" <> wrote:

>I dont know if anyone read digitalbits today....but the "Well...Here we Go
>again: Star Wars on DVD" article states that even though we are getting the
>SE movies.....they may be still a bit different from what we saw back in
>'97....George still might of tweaked them a bit. I know, I know, they are
>not the movies we all grew up with...but if that is what we are going to
>get...hopefully certain things were fixed (Who shoots first?)
>
>Any thoughts?
>

It's just a movie. I'll pick them up, they will round out my
collection nicely. To be fair, my copy of Return of the Jedi will
likely never see the inside of a DVD player by my hand, anyway.

Hitman of Las Vegas

Hitman of Las Vegas wrote on [Fri, 13 Feb 2004 04:45:06 GMT]:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:53:46 GMT, "TSKO" <> wrote:
>
>>I dont know if anyone read digitalbits today....but the "Well...Here we Go
>>again: Star Wars on DVD" article states that even though we are getting the
>>SE movies.....they may be still a bit different from what we saw back in
>>'97....George still might of tweaked them a bit. I know, I know, they are
>>not the movies we all grew up with...but if that is what we are going to
>>get...hopefully certain things were fixed (Who shoots first?)
>>
>>Any thoughts?
>>
>
> It's just a movie. I'll pick them up, they will round out my
> collection nicely. To be fair, my copy of Return of the Jedi will
> likely never see the inside of a DVD player by my hand, anyway.

Wow. Someone who takes the time to come to a group to discuss dvds and
he calls Star Wars just a movie.

Justin

"fredman" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:53:46 GMT, "TSKO" <> wrote:
>
> >I dont know if anyone read digitalbits today....but the "Well...Here we
Go
> >again: Star Wars on DVD" article states that even though we are getting
the
> >SE movies.....they may be still a bit different from what we saw back in
> >'97....George still might of tweaked them a bit. I know, I know, they
are
> >not the movies we all grew up with...but if that is what we are going to
> >get...hopefully certain things were fixed (Who shoots first?)
> >
> >Any thoughts?
> >
>
>
> <excerpt from thedigitalbits.com>
> "This is just my own personal preference, but if Lucas would just let
> Han shoot first again, fix that awful Jabba CGI, and put glowing
> blades on the sabers in the Ben/Vader duel, I'm fine with everything
> else in the SEs. I don't know specifically that any of that is
> actually going to happen, but I'm hopeful."
>
> Whether you're a casual or intense SW fan, I think that sums up what
> most of us would like out of these releases. All we can do is wait
> and see, although I will say that I do plan to get a set regardless.
> regards,
>
>
> =====================
>
> =====================

Greedo shooting first has to go, I mean he must of been a crap bounty hunter
if he aims his gun for ages and still miss's by 2 foot.
If hes touching the films up again why not clean up the small things like
Ben opening his sader on the Death Star (crap transition)

Karl

"Justin" <> wrote in message
news:...
> TSKO wrote on [Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:53:46 GMT]:
> > I dont know if anyone read digitalbits today....but the "Well...Here we
Go
> > again: Star Wars on DVD" article states that even though we are getting
the
> > SE movies.....they may be still a bit different from what we saw back in
> > '97....George still might of tweaked them a bit. I know, I know, they
are
> > not the movies we all grew up with...but if that is what we are going to
> > get...hopefully certain things were fixed (Who shoots first?)
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
>
> I'm hoping the rumours of adding Padme and young Obi Wan are unfounded.
> Oh, and younger Anakin


But you don't mind the baby Jar-Jar?

Mark W

Mark W wrote on [Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:49:54 -0000]:
>
> "Justin" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> TSKO wrote on [Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:53:46 GMT]:
>> > I dont know if anyone read digitalbits today....but the "Well...Here we
> Go
>> > again: Star Wars on DVD" article states that even though we are getting
> the
>> > SE movies.....they may be still a bit different from what we saw back in
>> > '97....George still might of tweaked them a bit. I know, I know, they
> are
>> > not the movies we all grew up with...but if that is what we are going to
>> > get...hopefully certain things were fixed (Who shoots first?)
>> >
>> > Any thoughts?
>> >
>>
>> I'm hoping the rumours of adding Padme and young Obi Wan are unfounded.
>> Oh, and younger Anakin
>
>
> But you don't mind the baby Jar-Jar?
>
>

Please tell me you're kidding.

Wait.... Why would a baby Jar Jar be in a movie set in a later time?

Justin

"TSKO" <> wrote:

> ....George still might of tweaked them a bit.

I'm sorry for this breach of netiquette, but I see this far
too often to ignore any longer...

It's not "might of". It's "might've", as in "might have".

We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread...

-- jayembee

jayembee