«

On 30 Dec 2003 21:02:24 -0800, (Bur) Gave us:

>"Richard C." <post-> wrote in message news:<3ff14d89$0$31843$ om>...
>> "Huck" <> wrote in message news:...
>> :
>>
>> Several INTENTIONALLY frame is such that it will look like crap on the FS
>> version........and have said so.
>> =====================
>Which directors said that and where did they say it (links please)?
>Deliberately doing bad work is not a good thing even for a
>temperamental "artiste".


Leave to n AOL retard to misinterpret things.

Composing for wide form factors rules out calling it "bad work"

It is actually "bad work" to **** up one's intention of wide form
art to cater to retards LIKE YOU.

"Bur" <> wrote in message
news: m...
: "Richard C." <post-> wrote in message
news:<3ff14d89$0$31843$ om>...
: > "Huck" <> wrote in message news:...
: > :
: >
: > Several INTENTIONALLY frame is such that it will look like crap on the FS
: > version........and have said so.
: > =====================
: Which directors said that and where did they say it (links please)?
: Deliberately doing bad work is not a good thing even for a
: temperamental "artiste".

=================
The intended ratio was the OAR shown in the theatre.
THAT was the artwork they intended.

"Deliberately doing bad work is not a good thing even for a temperamental "artiste""
On this we agree............ANY alteration of the OAR is "bad work".

[userme]

I need a tall screen to see as much code as possible. Widescreen is for gamers.