"Jens Thomsen" <> wrote in message
news:bonnv4$1gknek$...
> It seems to me that the idea of bundling DVDs has to do with
> unloading a bad movie or two with a good movie. _The Godfather_ set
> seems to be an exception in that it has two good movies (Parts 1 and
> 2) plus a very good extras disk. The only bad part of the set is Part
> 3.
<<Absolutely. I am quite curious about how they will sell Part 3, when
the films get released separately.>>
<<Btw. are they actually doing new transfers for The Godfather Trilogy,
or did I read this wrong? /Jens>>
According to a "New York Times" article, the old $105.99, 5-disk
_Godfather_ DVD set, released 10/9/01, will soon be totally antiquated.
DVDs made from new digital masters of all three movies will make the old
DVDs look pathetic by comparison. Paramount will be doing things right
this time.
So, it's out with the old and in with the new. Fortunately, the new and
improved _Godfather_ movies will be available separately, so there will
be no need to re-purchase _Godfather 3_. Maybe the "Extras" disk will
remain exclusive to the original, obsolete DVD bundle, so those who paid
big bucks for the original set won't feel too bad.
Or, maybe Part 3 will be bundled with the Extras disk. That's how the
disks are currently being rented: Parts 1 and 2 are rented separately
and Part 3 is rented with the Extras disk.
*** *** ***
Francis Ford Coppola's "Godfather" and "Godfather, Part II," which take
up three DVD's in a five-disc boxed set, don't look quite that bad,
but - given that they're among the greatest, most beautifully
photographed films of all time - the results are dismaying. Images are
faded in some scenes, way too dark in others and often speckled with
weird distortions. For instance, in the opening shot of "Part II," the
close-up of Al Pacino against a dark backdrop, it looks as if mosquitoes
are swarming down his face. The movie looks better when it's televised
on HBO.
Paramount is making new digital masters of the "Godfather" films for
reissue, as single-film discs, late next year.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/09/movies/09KAPL.html