«

DVD SCREENERS (Available Now)
01. Bruce Almighty (Jim Carrey) (10/10 quality)
02. Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle Of Life (Angelina Jolie)
03. Once Upon A Time In Mexico (Anthony Banderas)
04. Bad Boys II (Martin Lawrence)
05. The Medallion (Jackie Chan)
06. Hope Springs (Colin Firth)
07. The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen (Sean Connery) (10/10
quality)
08. American Wedding (Jason Biggs)
09. Dumb And Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd (10/10 quality)
10. Jeepers Creepers 2
11. The Hulk (Eric Bana) (10/10 quality)
12. Open Range (Kevin Costner)
13. Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machines (Arnold Schwarzenegger) (10/10
quality)
14. Seabiscuit (Tobey Maguire)
15. Charlie's Angels 2: Full Throttle (Cameron Diaz)
16. Pirates Of The Caribbean: The Curse Of Black Pearl (Johnny Depp)
(10/10 quality)
17. All I Want (Elijah Wood)
18. Gerry (Casey Affleck)
19. Alex & Emma (10/10 quality)

Email me @
Paypal Veified

$15.00 per DVD

Only one "R" in Jim Carey
<> wrote in message
news...
> DVD SCREENERS (Available Now)
> 01. Bruce Almighty (Jim Carrey) (10/10 quality)
> 02. Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle Of Life (Angelina Jolie)
> 03. Once Upon A Time In Mexico (Anthony Banderas)
> 04. Bad Boys II (Martin Lawrence)
> 05. The Medallion (Jackie Chan)
> 06. Hope Springs (Colin Firth)
> 07. The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen (Sean Connery) (10/10
> quality)
> 08. American Wedding (Jason Biggs)
> 09. Dumb And Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd (10/10 quality)
> 10. Jeepers Creepers 2
> 11. The Hulk (Eric Bana) (10/10 quality)
> 12. Open Range (Kevin Costner)
> 13. Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machines (Arnold Schwarzenegger) (10/10
> quality)
> 14. Seabiscuit (Tobey Maguire)
> 15. Charlie's Angels 2: Full Throttle (Cameron Diaz)
> 16. Pirates Of The Caribbean: The Curse Of Black Pearl (Johnny Depp)
> (10/10 quality)
> 17. All I Want (Elijah Wood)
> 18. Gerry (Casey Affleck)
> 19. Alex & Emma (10/10 quality)
>
> Email me @
> Paypal Veified
>
> $15.00 per DVD

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:17:06 +0100, "-" <> wrote:

>Only one "R" in Jim Carey

Who gives a ****

, says...
> DVD SCREENERS (Available Now)
> $15.00 per DVD

Sadly, this is precisely why the studios have decided not to send
screeners any more.

"Mark Spatny" <> wrote in message
news: k.net...
> , says...
> > DVD SCREENERS (Available Now)
> > $15.00 per DVD
>
> Sadly, this is precisely why the studios have decided not to send
> screeners any more.
Actually, its because of copies showing up on DIVX in newsgroups, screeners
have been sold for years and never was a problem. Ultimately all it will
hurt is the lesser named movies who will not get a fair shot because of low
exposure.

Ratmaster2000 wrote:
> "Mark Spatny" <> wrote in message
> news: k.net...
>
>>, says...
>>
>>>DVD SCREENERS (Available Now)
>>>$15.00 per DVD
>>
>>Sadly, this is precisely why the studios have decided not to send
>>screeners any more.
>
> Actually, its because of copies showing up on DIVX in newsgroups, screeners
> have been sold for years and never was a problem. Ultimately all it will
> hurt is the lesser named movies who will not get a fair shot because of low
> exposure.
>
>
Actually only the big studios have subscribed to the no screeners
policy, so the smaller movies may actually be helped.

dick

Dick Sidbury <> wrote in message

> Actually only the big studios have subscribed to the no screeners
> policy

It's not a studio policy, it's an MPAA one. And anyone who is a member
is obliged to obey to order. No MPAA membership means no ratings on
your movies--which means most theaters won't show them, Blockbuster
won't carry them, etc. And, of course, it means that you'll have one
helluva time getting any kind of serious investment $$ or any serious
actors/directors/producers to be involved with your company.

-Eric

Bitch and moan all you guys want about it, but the reason it is happening
now, is because of all the screeners that were being sold illegally in the
past. Everyone that legitimately gets a screener(or used to) knew damn well
that those were never to be resold or copied etc....Those are the people who
are responsible for the demise of the screener.
"Eric R." <> wrote in message
news: om...
> Dick Sidbury <> wrote in message
>
> > Actually only the big studios have subscribed to the no screeners
> > policy
>
> It's not a studio policy, it's an MPAA one. And anyone who is a member
> is obliged to obey to order. No MPAA membership means no ratings on
> your movies--which means most theaters won't show them, Blockbuster
> won't carry them, etc. And, of course, it means that you'll have one
> helluva time getting any kind of serious investment $$ or any serious
> actors/directors/producers to be involved with your company.
>
> -Eric

"Biz" <> wrote in message
news:2lhjb.2652$...
> Bitch and moan all you guys want about it, but the reason it is happening
> now, is because of all the screeners that were being sold illegally in the
> past. Everyone that legitimately gets a screener(or used to) knew damn
well
> that those were never to be resold or copied etc....Those are the people
who
> are responsible for the demise of the screener.
> "Eric R." <> wrote in message

That's b.s.
How many screeners have you seen for sale before a street date outside of
Asia?
It's a power play by the big five to keep the Indies out of the running for
the Oscars. That's why the ban is only in effect during the Oscar season.