> Just got the remastered extended version today, and I am VERY disappointed
> with it.
>
> Heck, I thought when they remaster a film they are supposed to make a
> film's quality better, not completely change the way it looks?!
> Everything looks cleaner and sharper, sure, but many of the scenes also
> looks lighter, especailly near the beginning of the film, making it look
> very unrealistic IMO.
>
> The film's cut differently too - that, along with the added scenes make
> the film overly long, as well as making it feel a bit disjointed in
> parts...
>
> What a waste of money!
>
> Anyone else thinks so around here? or do you exactly like this version?
On the flip side, you get more of the best thing about the movie: Alan
Rickman.
Mike Jackson
Editor & Webmaster, DVD Verdict
www.dvdverdict.com