Richard C is a Screen-Filler!

After years of belittling those who wanted their screens filled, Richard C
today joined their ranks:


> See...you did miss the point. If it were anamorphic it would<
> appear to fill the screen of a 1.78:1 set - just as 1.85:1 <
> appears to. < Richard C


Priceless.

Simply priceless.


Max Christoffersen

max christoffersen

"Sammy" <> wrote in message
news:...
: In article <bda78l$tpg$>,
: "max christoffersen" <> wrote:
: > <<<<<<blather>>>>>>>>>>
: > Max Christoffersen
:
: It's bad enough that you're a complete idiot. What's even worse is the
: way you blatantly distort what others say to get that infamous maxie
: punch in. You are so low that there isn't even an adjective that could
: begin to describe how low you are. Miserable **** comes close, but even
: worse than that.

=================
You are being too kind to him....................

Richard C.

"max christoffersen" <> wrote in message
news:bdctfg$jhu$...
:
: > : > See...you did miss the point. If it were anamorphic it would<
: > : > appear to fill the screen of a 1.78:1 set - just as 1.85:1 <
: > : > appears to. < Richard C
: > :
: > :
: > : Priceless.
: > :
: > : Simply priceless.
: > :
: > :
: > ======================
: > You just don't get it at all max.
: > The aspect ratio would NOT be altered to fill the screen.
: > Do you even understand what anamorphic DVDs do on a 16:9 screen?
: > It sounds like you are as dumb as a stump.
:
:
: We all understand what you are trying to do Richard.
:
: Simply: It is you want to fill your screen because it looks better.
:
: Deny it.
:
=======================
I deny it.
I want the original aspect ratio - ALWAYS.
But I want it as large as possible on my screen.
QED.

I do NOT want my screen filled by cropping a 2.35:1 movie, because that would NOT
look better.

Denial completed.

You are an ASS

Deny it.

Richard C.

> : Simply: It is you want to fill your screen because it looks better.
> :
> : Deny it.
> :
> =======================
> I deny it.
> I want the original aspect ratio - ALWAYS.
> But I want it as large as possible on my screen.
> QED.

Because it looks better.

Deny it.

> I do NOT want my screen filled by cropping a 2.35:1 movie, because that would
> NOT look better.
>
> Denial completed.


Not even close.

No one is talking about cropping.

We are talking about screen filling.

You want it.

End of story.

Hypocrtite.

Max Christoffersen

max christoffersen

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:40:18 +1200, "max christoffersen"
<> Gave us:

>
>> : Simply: It is you want to fill your screen because it looks better.
>> :
>> : Deny it.
>> :
>> =======================
>> I deny it.
>> I want the original aspect ratio - ALWAYS.
>> But I want it as large as possible on my screen.
>> QED.
>
>Because it looks better.
>
>Deny it.
>
>> I do NOT want my screen filled by cropping a 2.35:1 movie, because that would
>> NOT look better.
>>
>> Denial completed.
>
>
>Not even close.
>
>No one is talking about cropping.
>
>We are talking about screen filling.
>
>You want it.
>
>End of story.
>
>Hypocrtite.
>
>Max Christoffersen


You're retarded. End of story. No denying it.

DarkMatter

"max christoffersen" <> wrote in message
news:bddmqk$ps8$...
:
: > : Simply: It is you want to fill your screen because it looks better.
: > :
: > : Deny it.
: > :
: > =======================
: > I deny it.
: > I want the original aspect ratio - ALWAYS.
: > But I want it as large as possible on my screen.
: > QED.
:
: Because it looks better.
:
: Deny it.
:
: > I do NOT want my screen filled by cropping a 2.35:1 movie, because that would
: > NOT look better.
: >
: > Denial completed.
:
:
: Not even close.
:
: No one is talking about cropping.
:
: We are talking about screen filling.
:
: You want it.

============================
Prove it!
=========================
:
: End of story.
:
: Hypocrtite.
:
: Max Christoffersen

Richard C.

>> Not even close.
>>
>> No one is talking about cropping.
>>
>> We are talking about screen filling.
>>
>> You want it.
>>
>> End of story.
>>
>> Hypocrtite.
>>
>> Max Christoffersen
>
> Well lets see...there is a big difference...huge...between a 16:9 film
> filling the screen of a 16:9 set (regardless of size) as it was
> intended to, and a 16:9 film being cropped and chopped and panned and
> scanned to fill the screen of 4:3 set...as it was NOT intended

What has this got to do with anything?

This isn't what's being discussed.

> Also a 2:35 or 1:85 still does not "Fill" a 16:9 TV's screen, unless
> the disc was anamorphically enhanced (Ill have to check with that -
> I'm still a little fuzzy on the whole anamorphic thing myself) There
> are still bars only far less pronounced, and aspect ratio is still (as
> it almust must be) maintained.

Read what Richard has said.

He has the original aspect ratio - he's bitching that it doesn't fill his
screen because it is not anamorphic.

Richard is a screen filler.


Max Christoffersen

max christoffersen

Roget said:

> "No,(Richard), YOU don't get it!! SIZE *AND* ASPECT RATIO are
> **absolutely** related -- to YOUR ENJOYMENT of a THEATRICAL
> PRESENTATION IN your HOME on a TV..." <


Richard said:

>>> You are 100% WRONG when you make such a statement. <<<
>>> Richard C october 2001 <<<


Today Richard agrees.

Size and aspect ratio are related (see his whines about the non-anamorphic
Giant DVD being too small on his screen).

It only took Dick-wit two years to catch up.

Flip-flop.

Priceless about face.


Max Christoffersen

max christoffersen

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:56:02 +1200, "max christoffersen"
<> Gave us:

>Roget said:
>
> > "No,(Richard), YOU don't get it!! SIZE *AND* ASPECT RATIO are
> > **absolutely** related -- to YOUR ENJOYMENT of a THEATRICAL
> > PRESENTATION IN your HOME on a TV..." <
>
>
>Richard said:
>
> >>> You are 100% WRONG when you make such a statement. <<<
> >>> Richard C october 2001 <<<
>
>
>Today Richard agrees.
>
>Size and aspect ratio are related (see his whines about the non-anamorphic
>Giant DVD being too small on his screen).
>
>It only took Dick-wit two years to catch up.
>
>Flip-flop.
>
>Priceless about face.
>
>
>Max Christoffersen
>


You're a goddamned idiot, Max.

DarkMatter

"max christoffersen" <> wrote in message
news:bdfjgm$9a4$...
: Roget said:
:
: > "No,(Richard), YOU don't get it!! SIZE *AND* ASPECT RATIO are
: > **absolutely** related -- to YOUR ENJOYMENT of a THEATRICAL
: > PRESENTATION IN your HOME on a TV..." <
:
:
: Richard said:
:
: >>> You are 100% WRONG when you make such a statement. <<<
: >>> Richard C october 2001 <<<
:
:
: Today Richard agrees.
:
: Size and aspect ratio are related (see his whines about the non-anamorphic
: Giant DVD being too small on his screen).
:
: It only took Dick-wit two years to catch up.
:
: Flip-flop.
:
: Priceless about face.
:
:
: Max Christoffersen
:
================================
Context is everything.
You do not understand that.

You are simply a putz.

Richard C.