«

http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2...27/date002.htm

Sigma10D review in a Japan web site.
Quite interesting.

title corrected.
"Bunny" <> ¦b¶l¥ó
news:cak8v3$217o$ ¤¤¼¶¼g...
> http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2...27/date002.htm
>
> Sigma10D review in a Japan web site.
> Quite interesting.
>
>

"Bunny" <> wrote in message
news:cak8v3$217o$...
> http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2...27/date002.htm
>
> Sigma10D review in a Japan web site.
> Quite interesting.
>
I'm sure it is - to those who can read read Japanese.

Mick Sterbs wrote:

> "Bunny" <> wrote in message
> news:cak8v3$217o$...
>
>>http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2...27/date002.htm
>>
>>Sigma10D review in a Japan web site.
>>Quite interesting.
>>
>
> I'm sure it is - to those who can read read Japanese.
>
>
You don't have to reas Japanese to read the picture captions, and the
difference in colour on the windmill shot comparisons doesn't need any
downloading tedium either - though viewing the full size files does.

David

"Mick Sterbs" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> "Bunny" <> wrote in message

> > http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2...27/date002.htm
> >
> > Sigma10D review in a Japan web site.
> > Quite interesting.
> >
> I'm sure it is - to those who can read read Japanese.

No. It repeats the lie that the Foveon doesn't need a low-pass filter. In
big print, no less.

David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan

On 2004-06-14, David Kilpatrick <> wrote:
> You don't have to reas Japanese to read the picture captions, and the
> difference in colour on the windmill shot comparisons doesn't need any
> downloading tedium either - though viewing the full size files does.

Yes, that shows the common "too blue" skies of the Sigma. Interesting
that he used manual white balance of Sunlight for the Sigma when all
of the other cameras are on auto.

--
Erik

"Bunny" <> wrote in message
news:cak94j$21d0$...
> title corrected.
> "Bunny" <> ¦b¶l¥ó
> news:cak8v3$217o$ ¤¤¼¶¼g...
> > http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2...27/date002.htm
> >
> > Sigma10D review in a Japan web site.
> > Quite interesting.

Just enter the URL in a translating service like:
http://babelfish.altavista.digital.com/babelfish/tr , select translation
from Japanese to English and, although not perfect, you'll get the idea.

Bart

Bart van der Wolf wrote:
>
> "Bunny" <> wrote in message
> news:cak94j$21d0$...
> > title corrected.
> > "Bunny" <> ¦b¶l¥ó
> > news:cak8v3$217o$ ¤¤¼¶¼g...
> > > http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2...27/date002.htm
> > >
> > > Sigma10D review in a Japan web site.
> > > Quite interesting.
>
> Just enter the URL in a translating service like:
> http://babelfish.altavista.digital.com/babelfish/tr , select translation
> from Japanese to English and, although not perfect, you'll get the idea.

absolutely amazing!!

the sigma camera it is like reading talking about the clarity preddiot
himself.

if that does not seem clear, look at the site using babblefish.


>
> Bart

E. Magnuson wrote:

> On 2004-06-14, David Kilpatrick <> wrote:
>
>>You don't have to reas Japanese to read the picture captions, and the
>>difference in colour on the windmill shot comparisons doesn't need any
>>downloading tedium either - though viewing the full size files does.
>
>
> Yes, that shows the common "too blue" skies of the Sigma. Interesting
> that he used manual white balance of Sunlight for the Sigma when all
> of the other cameras are on auto.
>


Again, I have to differ - all the images looked to have weak, washed out
skies except the Sigma. For anyone selling library pix, the Sigma
results were very much what is needed in the thumbnails to even get a
client to click the shot. The others generally had very low impact. I
would have treated them to 20 per cent saturation boost and a contrast
increase too.

David

David Kilpatrick wrote:

> E. Magnuson wrote:
>
>> On 2004-06-14, David Kilpatrick <> wrote:
>>
>>> You don't have to reas Japanese to read the picture captions, and the
>>> difference in colour on the windmill shot comparisons doesn't need
>>> any downloading tedium either - though viewing the full size files does.
>>
>> Yes, that shows the common "too blue" skies of the Sigma. Interesting
>> that he used manual white balance of Sunlight for the Sigma when all
>> of the other cameras are on auto.
>
> Again, I have to differ - all the images looked to have weak, washed out
> skies except the Sigma. For anyone selling library pix, the Sigma
> results were very much what is needed in the thumbnails to even get a
> client to click the shot. The others generally had very low impact. I
> would have treated them to 20 per cent saturation boost and a contrast
> increase too.

How can one know how much or little any of those images were adjusted?

--
John Mcwilliams