Ron, thanks for the clarification of the technology; it sure
gives nice results! Had I not received the coupon for a
free trial of the Kodak equipment, I might not ever given it
a try!
I have a question for you. Are there controls to adjust
saturation, contrast, brightness, or tint? When I selected
the images to print, I didn't notice any options, but I
wasn't LOOKING particularly for any, either. I could adjust
my photo files before taking them into the store if those
parameters need to be tweaked if the Kodak unit doesn't have
those features.
I see from the URL you provided that the printerdock uses
thermal dye as well; does it provide identical results to
the unit I used in Walmart, or would there be some subtle or
not-so-subtle differences in print quality?
I'm gonna have to start throwing rocks at my HP970cse...
dave
Ron Baird wrote:
> Greetings Dave,
>
> Glad to hear you are pleased, Dave, and I am sure you are referring to the
> Kodak Picture Maker.
>
> Actually, the printer is really a Dye Thermal printer, not a laser printer.
> The quality is extremely good. Of course, it is based on the quality of the
> original image being used. Kodak announced a small version of that
> technology in the Kodak Printer Dock for its EasyShare Cameras. It prints
> in the 4x6 format. You can attach one directly to your computer to make as
> many prints as you like. Excellent.
>
> For a review of that printer, try visiting the following site.
>
> http://www.kodak.com/go/printerdock
>
> Should you ever have any questions on this printer, or any other Kodak
> product, let me know. I am glad to help you.
>
> Ron Baird
> Eastman Kodak Company
>
>
> "Bay Area Dave" <> wrote in message
> news
Qrtc.4853$ m...
>
>>I received a coupon in the mail, good for 10 free pictures
>>at a Kodak Print Station so I decided to give it a try. My
>>wife and I were amazed at the great quality of the pictures
>>compared with printing at home on an HP Inkjet. The gal
>>behind the counter said it uses a Laser printer. Whatever
>>it is, it looks very, very close to a picture made in a
>>photolab from a negative. I doubt I'll ever bother to spend
>>hours printing inferior pictures at home on my inkjet. It
>>takes too long, and between the ink and the paper costs, I
>>don't save a thing. the 4 x 6's were 36 cents at the
>>Walmart Kodak kiosk. You can scan prints on a flatbed
>>scanner, insert all the popular camera memory cards, use
>>bluetooth (PDA's and camera phones) and CD's. While I
>>didn't avail myself of the options, you can enlarge,
>>"enhance" (don't know the extent of that feature), zoom,
>>crop, reduce red-eye, add text and borders. The whole
>>process takes just a couple of minutes for 4 x6's and 8 x
>>10's. The pictures are semi-glossy. They are MORE shiny
>>than the 1 Hour photo pictures that Walmart makes, but not
>>super shiny like the Costco prints.
>>
>>For the price and convenience, I HIGHLY recommend giving
>>this a try.
>>
>>dave
>>
>
>
>