«

> > Bill Mcdonald wrote:
> > Douglas,
> > Don't leave. The photo's were great. I know there are people with
> > the technological savvy to track down whoever's behind the barrage of
> > filth which has swamped this group. Maybe the netgods will smile on
> > us and we can be rid of this psycho.

> "Jukka-Pekka Suominen" <> wrote
> The easiest way to get rid of him/her/it is to filter for "Organization:
> ", which will catch all of his/her/its, erm...
> posts.

you would prolly need a filter like Nfilter, or eNfilter

>It would seem that his/her/its ISP is craftech.com, so if someone
> feels the need to try to shut him/her/it up for real, that might be a
> good place to start, but I cannot say for sure.

OK, any other opinions?

> At any rate, just ignoring him/her/it will propably put an end to the
> drivel..

i haven't seen this strategy work yet
--
A newbie's Usenet first encounter occurs without a prophylactic

Steve Young wrote:
>>>Bill Mcdonald wrote:
>>>Douglas,
>>>Don't leave. The photo's were great. I know there are people with
>>>the technological savvy to track down whoever's behind the barrage of
>>>filth which has swamped this group. Maybe the netgods will smile on
>>>us and we can be rid of this psycho.
>
>
>>"Jukka-Pekka Suominen" <> wrote
>>The easiest way to get rid of him/her/it is to filter for "Organization:
>>", which will catch all of his/her/its, erm...
>>posts.
>
>
> you would prolly need a filter like Nfilter, or eNfilter

Propably, since most newsreaders won't let you write custom filters.

>>It would seem that his/her/its ISP is craftech.com, so if someone
>>feels the need to try to shut him/her/it up for real, that might be a
>>good place to start, but I cannot say for sure.
>
> OK, any other opinions?

I'm still not sure about this one, since I really don't know how exactly
the nym.alias.net anonymizer works, but all the troll posts have a
Message-ID like [something.something]@ccs1.craftech.com, which IMHO
would indicate that he/she/it is using craftech.com as his/her/its ISP.

>>At any rate, just ignoring him/her/it will propably put an end to the
>>drivel..
>
>
> i haven't seen this strategy work yet

Gotta give it some time..

-JP

Steve Young wrote:

> you would prolly need a filter like Nfilter, or eNfilter

"Prolly"?

Gary Eickmeier

Jukka-Pekka Suominen wrote:

> Steve Young wrote:

>> you would prolly need a filter like Nfilter, or eNfilter
>
>
> Propably, since most newsreaders won't let you write custom filters.

"Propably"?

Gary Eickmeier (A-a-a-a-a-a-a-h!)

"Gary Eickmeier" <> wrote in message
newsodYb.45226$ ...
>
>
> Steve Young wrote:
>
> > you would prolly need a filter like Nfilter, or eNfilter
>
> "Prolly"?
>
> Gary Eickmeier


Probbly

Doug

Doug wrote:
> "Gary Eickmeier" <> wrote in message
> newsodYb.45226$ ...
>>
>>
>> Steve Young wrote:
>>
>>> you would prolly need a filter like Nfilter, or eNfilter
>>
>> "Prolly"?
>>
>> Gary Eickmeier
>
>
> Probbly
>
> Doug

Probably...

"Doug" <> wrote in message
news:tOeYb.6551$ .rogers.com...
>
> "Gary Eickmeier" <> wrote in message
> newsodYb.45226$ ...
> >
> >
> > Steve Young wrote:
> >
> > > you would prolly need a filter like Nfilter, or eNfilter
> >
> > "Prolly"?
> >
> > Gary Eickmeier
>
>
> Probbly
>
> Doug

Prob-o-lib-o-ly

Paul

[POSTED TO rec.photo.digital - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <4cbYb.33047$> on Mon, 16 Feb
2004 22:09:04 GMT, "Steve Young" <> wrote:

>> "Jukka-Pekka Suominen" <> wrote

>> The easiest way to get rid of him/her/it is to filter for "Organization:
>> ", which will catch all of his/her/its, erm...
>> posts.
>
>you would prolly need a filter like Nfilter, or eNfilter

Another option that is probably more effective in general is to use a naive
Bayesian classifier. The one I use on my email, POPFile, is over 99.7%
accrate, and there's an NNTP (Usenet news) proxy module for POPFile -- see
<http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=195560>.

--
Best regards,
John Navas
[PLEASE NOTE: Ads belong *only* in rec.photo.marketplace.digital, as per
<http://bobatkins.photo.net/info/charter.htm> <http://rpdfaq.50megs.com/>]

Kibo informs me that John Navas <> stated
that:

>Another option that is probably more effective in general is to use a naive
>Bayesian classifier. The one I use on my email, POPFile, is over 99.7%
>accrate, and there's an NNTP (Usenet news) proxy module for POPFile -- see
><http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=195560>.

I'm already using Popfilter for my email, & as you say, it's pretty
good. Are you actually using the Usenet module yourself? At the time I
looked at it, it was still very experimental, & very undocumented. If
it's working for you, I'd like to give it another try.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

[POSTED TO rec.photo.digital - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <> on Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:06:08
+1100, Lionel <> wrote:

>Kibo informs me that John Navas <> stated
>that:
>
>>Another option that is probably more effective in general is to use a naive
>>Bayesian classifier. The one I use on my email, POPFile, is over 99.7%
>>accrate, and there's an NNTP (Usenet news) proxy module for POPFile -- see
>><http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=195560>.
>
>I'm already using Popfilter for my email, & as you say, it's pretty
>good. Are you actually using the Usenet module yourself? At the time I
>looked at it, it was still very experimental, & very undocumented. If
>it's working for you, I'd like to give it another try.

My understanding is that it just embeds standard POPFile headers. Since my
newsreader of choice (Forte Agent) won't filter on arbitrary headers, there's
no reason for me to even try it.

--
Best regards,
John Navas
[PLEASE NOTE: Ads belong *only* in rec.photo.marketplace.digital, as per
<http://bobatkins.photo.net/info/charter.htm> <http://rpdfaq.50megs.com/>]